住院烧伤患者发生 ARDS 的风险因素:国家创伤数据库分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Danielle Sim, Madhu Subramanian, Julie Caffrey
{"title":"住院烧伤患者发生 ARDS 的风险因素:国家创伤数据库分析。","authors":"Danielle Sim, Madhu Subramanian, Julie Caffrey","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a common complication among mechanically ventilated adult burn patients; however, the risk factors associated with its development are not well understood. Conflicting evidence also exists regarding ARDS as an independent predictor of poor hospital outcomes. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for ARDS in mechanically ventilated adult burn patients and characterize the impact of ARDS on hospital course. The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was queried for patients >=18 years with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes corresponding to burn injury from 2007-2016. Hospitalized patients with at least 48 hours of mechanical ventilation were included. Multivariate logistic regression were used to identify risk factors for ARDS. Propensity score-matched analysis at a 1:3 ratio was used to determine the impact of ARDS on hospital course. This sample included 13928 patients, of which 1437 (10.3%) developed ARDS. Hypotension in the Emergency Department, alcohol use disorder, total body surface area (TBSA), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and inhalation injury were independently associated with ARDS. In the propensity score-matched cohort, ARDS patients had a significantly longer median (interquartile range) length of stay (31 [15-54] vs. 22 [9-43], p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was also significantly higher in the ARDS cohort (203 [35%] vs. 325 [24%], p<0.001). These findings highlight the impact of patient and injury characteristics on developing ARDS and support the consideration of ARDS when estimating mortality risk in burn patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for ARDS in Hospitalized Burn Patients: An Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Sim, Madhu Subramanian, Julie Caffrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/irae199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a common complication among mechanically ventilated adult burn patients; however, the risk factors associated with its development are not well understood. Conflicting evidence also exists regarding ARDS as an independent predictor of poor hospital outcomes. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for ARDS in mechanically ventilated adult burn patients and characterize the impact of ARDS on hospital course. The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was queried for patients >=18 years with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes corresponding to burn injury from 2007-2016. Hospitalized patients with at least 48 hours of mechanical ventilation were included. Multivariate logistic regression were used to identify risk factors for ARDS. Propensity score-matched analysis at a 1:3 ratio was used to determine the impact of ARDS on hospital course. This sample included 13928 patients, of which 1437 (10.3%) developed ARDS. Hypotension in the Emergency Department, alcohol use disorder, total body surface area (TBSA), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and inhalation injury were independently associated with ARDS. In the propensity score-matched cohort, ARDS patients had a significantly longer median (interquartile range) length of stay (31 [15-54] vs. 22 [9-43], p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was also significantly higher in the ARDS cohort (203 [35%] vs. 325 [24%], p<0.001). These findings highlight the impact of patient and injury characteristics on developing ARDS and support the consideration of ARDS when estimating mortality risk in burn patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是机械通气的成年烧伤患者中常见的并发症;然而,人们对其发生的相关风险因素并不十分了解。关于 ARDS 是不良住院预后的独立预测因素,也存在相互矛盾的证据。本研究旨在确定机械通气成人烧伤患者发生 ARDS 的风险因素,并描述 ARDS 对住院过程的影响。研究人员在美国国家创伤数据库(NTDB)中查询了 2007-2016 年间年龄大于等于 18 岁、具有与烧伤相对应的国际疾病分类(ICD)代码的患者。研究还纳入了至少接受过 48 小时机械通气的住院患者。采用多变量逻辑回归确定 ARDS 的风险因素。以 1:3 的比例进行倾向评分匹配分析,以确定 ARDS 对住院过程的影响。该样本包括 13928 名患者,其中 1437 人(10.3%)发生了 ARDS。急诊科低血压、酒精使用障碍、总体表面积(TBSA)、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和吸入性损伤与 ARDS 有独立关联。在倾向评分匹配队列中,ARDS 患者的中位(四分位间)住院时间明显更长(31 [15-54] vs. 22 [9-43],P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Factors for ARDS in Hospitalized Burn Patients: An Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a common complication among mechanically ventilated adult burn patients; however, the risk factors associated with its development are not well understood. Conflicting evidence also exists regarding ARDS as an independent predictor of poor hospital outcomes. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for ARDS in mechanically ventilated adult burn patients and characterize the impact of ARDS on hospital course. The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was queried for patients >=18 years with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes corresponding to burn injury from 2007-2016. Hospitalized patients with at least 48 hours of mechanical ventilation were included. Multivariate logistic regression were used to identify risk factors for ARDS. Propensity score-matched analysis at a 1:3 ratio was used to determine the impact of ARDS on hospital course. This sample included 13928 patients, of which 1437 (10.3%) developed ARDS. Hypotension in the Emergency Department, alcohol use disorder, total body surface area (TBSA), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and inhalation injury were independently associated with ARDS. In the propensity score-matched cohort, ARDS patients had a significantly longer median (interquartile range) length of stay (31 [15-54] vs. 22 [9-43], p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was also significantly higher in the ARDS cohort (203 [35%] vs. 325 [24%], p<0.001). These findings highlight the impact of patient and injury characteristics on developing ARDS and support the consideration of ARDS when estimating mortality risk in burn patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信