血液酒精分析中盲法质量控制程序九年来的乙醇稳定性。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Erika Phung, Corissa Rodgers, Andrea Gooden, Peter Stout, Dayong Lee
{"title":"血液酒精分析中盲法质量控制程序九年来的乙醇稳定性。","authors":"Erika Phung, Corissa Rodgers, Andrea Gooden, Peter Stout, Dayong Lee","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A blind quality control (BQC) program in blood alcohol analysis was implemented at the Houston Forensic Science Center (HFSC) in September 2015. By mimicking authentic toxicology blood evidence, the laboratory can perform a concurrent evaluation of their technical and administrative casework procedures and test the accuracy and reliability of their volatile analysis method in a format that is blinded to the analyst. From September 2015 to November 2023, HFSC's Quality Division submitted 1228 antemortem whole blood samples: 292 ethanol-negative samples and 936 ethanol-positive samples at sixteen target concentrations (0.051, 0.080, 0.100, 0.110, 0.120, 0.130, 0.150, 0.160, 0.170, 0.180, 0.190, 0.200, 0.230, 0.240, 0.250, and 0.260 g/dL). A second, unopened blood tube in 168 of the 1228 BQCs was also analyzed after 721-1140 days: 24 ethanol-negative samples and 144 ethanol-positive samples at five target concentrations (0.080, 0.100, 0.130, 0.180, and 0.240 g/dL). All 316 ethanol-negative samples remained negative. After 42-758 days, the average (median, range) change in ethanol concentration of the 936 positive samples was -1.4% (-1.3%, -12.0% to +8.4%) with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) observed for the gradual decline in blood alcohol concentration (BAC) over time. The average BAC percentage differences per target concentration, ranged from -6.4% (-0.008 g/dL) to +5.7% (+0.011 g/dL), were within HFSC's current measurement uncertainty (9.4% at k=3), showing no apparent correlation between the change in ethanol and the theoretical target concentration. As the analysis time between the two blood specimens from the same evidence kit extended, the loss in ethanol significantly increased (P < 0.001).</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethanol stability from nine years of a blind quality control program in blood alcohol analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Erika Phung, Corissa Rodgers, Andrea Gooden, Peter Stout, Dayong Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jat/bkae085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A blind quality control (BQC) program in blood alcohol analysis was implemented at the Houston Forensic Science Center (HFSC) in September 2015. By mimicking authentic toxicology blood evidence, the laboratory can perform a concurrent evaluation of their technical and administrative casework procedures and test the accuracy and reliability of their volatile analysis method in a format that is blinded to the analyst. From September 2015 to November 2023, HFSC's Quality Division submitted 1228 antemortem whole blood samples: 292 ethanol-negative samples and 936 ethanol-positive samples at sixteen target concentrations (0.051, 0.080, 0.100, 0.110, 0.120, 0.130, 0.150, 0.160, 0.170, 0.180, 0.190, 0.200, 0.230, 0.240, 0.250, and 0.260 g/dL). A second, unopened blood tube in 168 of the 1228 BQCs was also analyzed after 721-1140 days: 24 ethanol-negative samples and 144 ethanol-positive samples at five target concentrations (0.080, 0.100, 0.130, 0.180, and 0.240 g/dL). All 316 ethanol-negative samples remained negative. After 42-758 days, the average (median, range) change in ethanol concentration of the 936 positive samples was -1.4% (-1.3%, -12.0% to +8.4%) with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) observed for the gradual decline in blood alcohol concentration (BAC) over time. The average BAC percentage differences per target concentration, ranged from -6.4% (-0.008 g/dL) to +5.7% (+0.011 g/dL), were within HFSC's current measurement uncertainty (9.4% at k=3), showing no apparent correlation between the change in ethanol and the theoretical target concentration. As the analysis time between the two blood specimens from the same evidence kit extended, the loss in ethanol significantly increased (P < 0.001).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae085\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

休斯顿法医科学中心(HFSC)于2015年9月实施了血液酒精分析盲法质量控制(BQC)计划。通过模拟真实的毒物学血液证据,实验室可以对其技术和行政办案程序进行同步评估,并以对分析师保密的形式测试其挥发性分析方法的准确性和可靠性。从 2015 年 9 月到 2023 年 11 月,HFSC 质量部提交了 1228 份死前全血样本:在 16 个目标浓度(0.051、0.080、0.100、0.110、0.120、0.130、0.150、0.160、0.170、0.180、0.190、0.200、0.230、0.240、0.250 和 0.260 g/dL)下的 292 份乙醇阴性样本和 936 份乙醇阳性样本。在 721-1140 天后,还对 1228 个 BQCs 中 168 个未开封的第二支血管进行了分析:24 个乙醇阴性样本和 144 个乙醇阳性样本,检测五个目标浓度(0.080、0.100、0.130、0.180 和 0.240 g/dL)。所有 316 份乙醇阴性样本均保持阴性。42-758 天后,936 份阳性样本的乙醇浓度平均变化(中位数,范围)为-1.4%(-1.3%,-12.0% 到 +8.4%),随着时间的推移,血液中酒精浓度(BAC)逐渐下降,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。每个目标浓度的平均 BAC 百分比差异从 -6.4% (-0.008 g/dL) 到 +5.7% (+0.011 g/dL) 不等,均在 HFSC 目前的测量不确定性(k=3 时为 9.4%)范围内,表明乙醇变化与理论目标浓度之间没有明显的相关性。随着来自同一证物试剂盒的两个血液样本之间的分析时间延长,乙醇的损失显著增加(P < 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethanol stability from nine years of a blind quality control program in blood alcohol analysis.

A blind quality control (BQC) program in blood alcohol analysis was implemented at the Houston Forensic Science Center (HFSC) in September 2015. By mimicking authentic toxicology blood evidence, the laboratory can perform a concurrent evaluation of their technical and administrative casework procedures and test the accuracy and reliability of their volatile analysis method in a format that is blinded to the analyst. From September 2015 to November 2023, HFSC's Quality Division submitted 1228 antemortem whole blood samples: 292 ethanol-negative samples and 936 ethanol-positive samples at sixteen target concentrations (0.051, 0.080, 0.100, 0.110, 0.120, 0.130, 0.150, 0.160, 0.170, 0.180, 0.190, 0.200, 0.230, 0.240, 0.250, and 0.260 g/dL). A second, unopened blood tube in 168 of the 1228 BQCs was also analyzed after 721-1140 days: 24 ethanol-negative samples and 144 ethanol-positive samples at five target concentrations (0.080, 0.100, 0.130, 0.180, and 0.240 g/dL). All 316 ethanol-negative samples remained negative. After 42-758 days, the average (median, range) change in ethanol concentration of the 936 positive samples was -1.4% (-1.3%, -12.0% to +8.4%) with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) observed for the gradual decline in blood alcohol concentration (BAC) over time. The average BAC percentage differences per target concentration, ranged from -6.4% (-0.008 g/dL) to +5.7% (+0.011 g/dL), were within HFSC's current measurement uncertainty (9.4% at k=3), showing no apparent correlation between the change in ethanol and the theoretical target concentration. As the analysis time between the two blood specimens from the same evidence kit extended, the loss in ethanol significantly increased (P < 0.001).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信