Simon Grison, Lydia Johnson-Ferguson, Matthias Vonmoos, Markus R Baumgartner, Boris B Quednow
{"title":"自我报告的可卡因使用模式与头发中的可卡因及其代谢物之间的关联:对临床和法医实践的启示。","authors":"Simon Grison, Lydia Johnson-Ferguson, Matthias Vonmoos, Markus R Baumgartner, Boris B Quednow","doi":"10.1002/dta.3825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In forensic toxicology, it has been debated if hair testing allows an estimation of the intensity of cocaine use-an assumption that may have risen because self-reports in a forensic setting are of uncertain validity per se. We therefore investigated the relationship between self-reported cocaine use and cocaine hair concentrations (including its main metabolites benzoylecgonine and norcocaine) in chronic cocaine users voluntary participating in psychiatric study settings. Additionally, we tested whether hair testing can distinguish between individuals with and without a diagnosis of cocaine dependency. Cocaine users (N = 195) from three independent experimental studies reported their average powder cocaine consumption in g/week over the last 3-4 months in an interview and provided a 3- to 4-cm hair sample assayed with liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry. Moreover, study participants were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-IV) for psychiatric diagnoses. Using linear regression models, we found a robust correlation between cocaine<sub>total</sub> (sum of cocaine and metabolites) hair concentration and self-reported cocaine use in g/week (r<sub>cocainetotal</sub> = 0.47, p < 0.001), indicating that 1000 pg/mg cocaine<sub>total</sub> corresponded to a use of 0.80 g/week (confidence interval [95%]: 0.56-1.07 g/week). In logistic regression models, cocaine<sub>total</sub> hair concentration predicted cocaine dependency with a sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.65 (threshold 0.5), suggesting its acceptable capacity to distinguish dependent from non-dependent cocaine users. The findings may have significant implications for forensic and clinical practices, encouraging the use of hair analysis as a potential tool for monitoring cocaine use and dependence.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations Between Self-Reported Cocaine Use Patterns and Cocaine and Its Metabolites in Hair: Implications for Clinical and Forensic Practices.\",\"authors\":\"Simon Grison, Lydia Johnson-Ferguson, Matthias Vonmoos, Markus R Baumgartner, Boris B Quednow\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dta.3825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In forensic toxicology, it has been debated if hair testing allows an estimation of the intensity of cocaine use-an assumption that may have risen because self-reports in a forensic setting are of uncertain validity per se. We therefore investigated the relationship between self-reported cocaine use and cocaine hair concentrations (including its main metabolites benzoylecgonine and norcocaine) in chronic cocaine users voluntary participating in psychiatric study settings. Additionally, we tested whether hair testing can distinguish between individuals with and without a diagnosis of cocaine dependency. Cocaine users (N = 195) from three independent experimental studies reported their average powder cocaine consumption in g/week over the last 3-4 months in an interview and provided a 3- to 4-cm hair sample assayed with liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry. Moreover, study participants were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-IV) for psychiatric diagnoses. Using linear regression models, we found a robust correlation between cocaine<sub>total</sub> (sum of cocaine and metabolites) hair concentration and self-reported cocaine use in g/week (r<sub>cocainetotal</sub> = 0.47, p < 0.001), indicating that 1000 pg/mg cocaine<sub>total</sub> corresponded to a use of 0.80 g/week (confidence interval [95%]: 0.56-1.07 g/week). In logistic regression models, cocaine<sub>total</sub> hair concentration predicted cocaine dependency with a sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.65 (threshold 0.5), suggesting its acceptable capacity to distinguish dependent from non-dependent cocaine users. The findings may have significant implications for forensic and clinical practices, encouraging the use of hair analysis as a potential tool for monitoring cocaine use and dependence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3825\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Associations Between Self-Reported Cocaine Use Patterns and Cocaine and Its Metabolites in Hair: Implications for Clinical and Forensic Practices.
In forensic toxicology, it has been debated if hair testing allows an estimation of the intensity of cocaine use-an assumption that may have risen because self-reports in a forensic setting are of uncertain validity per se. We therefore investigated the relationship between self-reported cocaine use and cocaine hair concentrations (including its main metabolites benzoylecgonine and norcocaine) in chronic cocaine users voluntary participating in psychiatric study settings. Additionally, we tested whether hair testing can distinguish between individuals with and without a diagnosis of cocaine dependency. Cocaine users (N = 195) from three independent experimental studies reported their average powder cocaine consumption in g/week over the last 3-4 months in an interview and provided a 3- to 4-cm hair sample assayed with liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry. Moreover, study participants were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-IV) for psychiatric diagnoses. Using linear regression models, we found a robust correlation between cocainetotal (sum of cocaine and metabolites) hair concentration and self-reported cocaine use in g/week (rcocainetotal = 0.47, p < 0.001), indicating that 1000 pg/mg cocainetotal corresponded to a use of 0.80 g/week (confidence interval [95%]: 0.56-1.07 g/week). In logistic regression models, cocainetotal hair concentration predicted cocaine dependency with a sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.65 (threshold 0.5), suggesting its acceptable capacity to distinguish dependent from non-dependent cocaine users. The findings may have significant implications for forensic and clinical practices, encouraging the use of hair analysis as a potential tool for monitoring cocaine use and dependence.
期刊介绍:
As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances.
In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds).
Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.