{"title":"多井场地质碳封存的风险评估与管理策略","authors":"Tianlong Yu , Jingqi Gao , Hao Yang , Xiang Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2024.10.097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many oil and gas production areas may serve as potential geologic carbon storage(GCS) sites, but large-scale CO<sub>2</sub> injection in these sites with multiple legacy wells poses a leakage risk. Therefore, it is crucial to analyze the well leakage risk of these GCS sites and develop effective risk management strategies to minimize CO<sub>2</sub> and brine leakage. In this study, we hypothesized a GCS site based on the Jingbian area in the Ordos Basin, which has 177 legacy wells. We conducted a three-dimensional geological modeling of the site and simulated the injection and migration of CO<sub>2</sub>. Using the National Risk Assessment Partnership’s open-source Integrated Assessment toolkit, we outlined a workflow for assessing the risk of CO<sub>2</sub> and brine leakage in multi-well site. Simulations of CO<sub>2</sub> and brine leakage through 177 existing wells into the USDW or the atmosphere are used as an indicator of potential risk. Finally, we proposed risk management strategies based on well integrity, injection rate, and pollution range, verifying their effectiveness. The results of the 95th percentile (P95) model implementation showed that the leakage risk of GCS sites was low over 150 years, with a CO<sub>2</sub> leakage of 15,996.4 tonnes(0.16 % of the 10<sup>7</sup> t injected). The risk-based strategy outperformed both distance-based strategy and hybrid strategy overall. Reducing injection rates alone proved ineffective as a risk management strategy. Only high-risk wells near the injection zone may cause pollution to USDW. Meanwhile, legacy wells have negligible impact on atmospheric pollution. The management strategy based on pollution range can be used as a supplement to the risk-based strategy in practical engineering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"192 ","pages":"Pages 822-836"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk assessment and management strategy of geologic carbon storage in multi-well site\",\"authors\":\"Tianlong Yu , Jingqi Gao , Hao Yang , Xiang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psep.2024.10.097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Many oil and gas production areas may serve as potential geologic carbon storage(GCS) sites, but large-scale CO<sub>2</sub> injection in these sites with multiple legacy wells poses a leakage risk. Therefore, it is crucial to analyze the well leakage risk of these GCS sites and develop effective risk management strategies to minimize CO<sub>2</sub> and brine leakage. In this study, we hypothesized a GCS site based on the Jingbian area in the Ordos Basin, which has 177 legacy wells. We conducted a three-dimensional geological modeling of the site and simulated the injection and migration of CO<sub>2</sub>. Using the National Risk Assessment Partnership’s open-source Integrated Assessment toolkit, we outlined a workflow for assessing the risk of CO<sub>2</sub> and brine leakage in multi-well site. Simulations of CO<sub>2</sub> and brine leakage through 177 existing wells into the USDW or the atmosphere are used as an indicator of potential risk. Finally, we proposed risk management strategies based on well integrity, injection rate, and pollution range, verifying their effectiveness. The results of the 95th percentile (P95) model implementation showed that the leakage risk of GCS sites was low over 150 years, with a CO<sub>2</sub> leakage of 15,996.4 tonnes(0.16 % of the 10<sup>7</sup> t injected). The risk-based strategy outperformed both distance-based strategy and hybrid strategy overall. Reducing injection rates alone proved ineffective as a risk management strategy. Only high-risk wells near the injection zone may cause pollution to USDW. Meanwhile, legacy wells have negligible impact on atmospheric pollution. The management strategy based on pollution range can be used as a supplement to the risk-based strategy in practical engineering.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 822-836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582024013855\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582024013855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk assessment and management strategy of geologic carbon storage in multi-well site
Many oil and gas production areas may serve as potential geologic carbon storage(GCS) sites, but large-scale CO2 injection in these sites with multiple legacy wells poses a leakage risk. Therefore, it is crucial to analyze the well leakage risk of these GCS sites and develop effective risk management strategies to minimize CO2 and brine leakage. In this study, we hypothesized a GCS site based on the Jingbian area in the Ordos Basin, which has 177 legacy wells. We conducted a three-dimensional geological modeling of the site and simulated the injection and migration of CO2. Using the National Risk Assessment Partnership’s open-source Integrated Assessment toolkit, we outlined a workflow for assessing the risk of CO2 and brine leakage in multi-well site. Simulations of CO2 and brine leakage through 177 existing wells into the USDW or the atmosphere are used as an indicator of potential risk. Finally, we proposed risk management strategies based on well integrity, injection rate, and pollution range, verifying their effectiveness. The results of the 95th percentile (P95) model implementation showed that the leakage risk of GCS sites was low over 150 years, with a CO2 leakage of 15,996.4 tonnes(0.16 % of the 107 t injected). The risk-based strategy outperformed both distance-based strategy and hybrid strategy overall. Reducing injection rates alone proved ineffective as a risk management strategy. Only high-risk wells near the injection zone may cause pollution to USDW. Meanwhile, legacy wells have negligible impact on atmospheric pollution. The management strategy based on pollution range can be used as a supplement to the risk-based strategy in practical engineering.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.