增强型二维模型可替代双排水系统用于城市洪水模拟

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Michael Oberauer, Boris Lehmann
{"title":"增强型二维模型可替代双排水系统用于城市洪水模拟","authors":"Michael Oberauer,&nbsp;Boris Lehmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As research in the field of analysing urban flood rainfall events progresses, it is evident that dual-drainage models remain the standard for producing the most realistic results of flood extension and water depth. However, the development of these sophisticated models is contingent upon the availability of comprehensive data sets that can be used to simulate runoff behaviour on the surface and account for hydraulic processes within the sewer network. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that comparable outcomes can be achieved through the modification of 2D surface models, which require less data and are more straightforward to set up. In order to test the efficacy of different methodologies for the enhancement of 2D models, two distinct approaches were implemented in two study areas with disparate rainfall loads in a city in south-west Germany. The results were then compared with those of a 1D/2D model. The findings of this study demonstrate that the methodologies tested are effective in improving the accuracy of 2D models, and that they are capable of producing results that closely align with those of dual-drainage models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"645 ","pages":"Article 132198"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced 2D-models as alternative to dual-drainage systems for urban flood simulation\",\"authors\":\"Michael Oberauer,&nbsp;Boris Lehmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As research in the field of analysing urban flood rainfall events progresses, it is evident that dual-drainage models remain the standard for producing the most realistic results of flood extension and water depth. However, the development of these sophisticated models is contingent upon the availability of comprehensive data sets that can be used to simulate runoff behaviour on the surface and account for hydraulic processes within the sewer network. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that comparable outcomes can be achieved through the modification of 2D surface models, which require less data and are more straightforward to set up. In order to test the efficacy of different methodologies for the enhancement of 2D models, two distinct approaches were implemented in two study areas with disparate rainfall loads in a city in south-west Germany. The results were then compared with those of a 1D/2D model. The findings of this study demonstrate that the methodologies tested are effective in improving the accuracy of 2D models, and that they are capable of producing results that closely align with those of dual-drainage models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"645 \",\"pages\":\"Article 132198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424015944\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424015944","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着城市洪水降雨事件分析领域研究的不断深入,双排水模型显然仍是产生最逼真的洪水扩展和水深结果的标准。然而,这些复杂模型的开发取决于是否有全面的数据集,这些数据集可用于模拟地表径流行为并考虑下水道网络内的水力过程。本研究的目的是证明,通过修改二维地表模型可以获得类似的结果,因为二维地表模型所需的数据较少,设置起来也更简单。为了测试不同方法对增强二维模型的效果,我们在德国西南部一个城市的两个降雨负荷不同的研究区域采用了两种不同的方法。然后将结果与一维/二维模型的结果进行了比较。研究结果表明,所测试的方法能有效提高二维模型的准确性,并能得出与双排水模型接近的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced 2D-models as alternative to dual-drainage systems for urban flood simulation
As research in the field of analysing urban flood rainfall events progresses, it is evident that dual-drainage models remain the standard for producing the most realistic results of flood extension and water depth. However, the development of these sophisticated models is contingent upon the availability of comprehensive data sets that can be used to simulate runoff behaviour on the surface and account for hydraulic processes within the sewer network. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that comparable outcomes can be achieved through the modification of 2D surface models, which require less data and are more straightforward to set up. In order to test the efficacy of different methodologies for the enhancement of 2D models, two distinct approaches were implemented in two study areas with disparate rainfall loads in a city in south-west Germany. The results were then compared with those of a 1D/2D model. The findings of this study demonstrate that the methodologies tested are effective in improving the accuracy of 2D models, and that they are capable of producing results that closely align with those of dual-drainage models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信