{"title":"教师自我效能感与教师复原力之间相关性的元分析:协同成长与环境差异","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The relationship between teacher self-efficacy (TSE) and teacher resilience (TR) is a bourgeoning area of study in teacher education research. This meta-analysis is the first of its kind to synthesise ‘fragmented’ quantitative evidence on the correlation between the two constructs. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a total of 21 studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing a sample of 6022 pre-service and in-service teachers across different national settings. The random-effects model yielded a statistically significant, positive, moderate correlation between TSE and TR (<em>r</em> = .49). Follow-up subgroup meta-analysis revealed the variability in the effect sizes between studies conducted in Asia, Europe, the Caribbean, and North America. No statistically significant variability in the effect sizes was found between pre-service and in-service teacher samples or between studies using different measures of resilience and self-efficacy. This meta-analysis provides insights into fostering the ‘concerted growth’ in TSE and TR through initial teacher education and ongoing professional development. These insights offer a productive response to the challenging teaching profession.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis of the correlation between teacher self-efficacy and teacher resilience: Concerted growth and contextual variance\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The relationship between teacher self-efficacy (TSE) and teacher resilience (TR) is a bourgeoning area of study in teacher education research. This meta-analysis is the first of its kind to synthesise ‘fragmented’ quantitative evidence on the correlation between the two constructs. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a total of 21 studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing a sample of 6022 pre-service and in-service teachers across different national settings. The random-effects model yielded a statistically significant, positive, moderate correlation between TSE and TR (<em>r</em> = .49). Follow-up subgroup meta-analysis revealed the variability in the effect sizes between studies conducted in Asia, Europe, the Caribbean, and North America. No statistically significant variability in the effect sizes was found between pre-service and in-service teacher samples or between studies using different measures of resilience and self-efficacy. This meta-analysis provides insights into fostering the ‘concerted growth’ in TSE and TR through initial teacher education and ongoing professional development. These insights offer a productive response to the challenging teaching profession.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X2400054X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X2400054X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A meta-analysis of the correlation between teacher self-efficacy and teacher resilience: Concerted growth and contextual variance
The relationship between teacher self-efficacy (TSE) and teacher resilience (TR) is a bourgeoning area of study in teacher education research. This meta-analysis is the first of its kind to synthesise ‘fragmented’ quantitative evidence on the correlation between the two constructs. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a total of 21 studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing a sample of 6022 pre-service and in-service teachers across different national settings. The random-effects model yielded a statistically significant, positive, moderate correlation between TSE and TR (r = .49). Follow-up subgroup meta-analysis revealed the variability in the effect sizes between studies conducted in Asia, Europe, the Caribbean, and North America. No statistically significant variability in the effect sizes was found between pre-service and in-service teacher samples or between studies using different measures of resilience and self-efficacy. This meta-analysis provides insights into fostering the ‘concerted growth’ in TSE and TR through initial teacher education and ongoing professional development. These insights offer a productive response to the challenging teaching profession.
期刊介绍:
Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.