Experimental investigation on the vented flame and pressure behaviour of hydrogen-air mixtures

To explore the changes in pressure and flame propagation inside and outside the vessel when the pipe diameter does not match the vent diameter, and to check the conservatism of standards NFPA 68 and EN 14491 for this case, an experimental apparatus was utilized to investigate the influences of static activation pressure (0.7–1.75 bar) and vent diameter (30–70 mm) on the deflagration behavior of hydrogen–air mixtures (Φ: 0.6–1.4). The vented pressure, flame propagation, and pressure–flame interaction characteristics of hydrogen–air mixtures were observed and analyzed. Additionally, the conservatism of the calculated venting area under the experimental conditions of NPFA 68 and EN 14491 was verified. The results indicated that under an equivalence ratio of 0.6, the pressure-time curve inside the container exhibited only one peak (P_max11). In the stoichiometric and fuel-rich states, the pressure-time curve inside the container exhibited two peaks attributed to the decrease in venting efficiency due to the secondary explosion inside the pipe, increasing the turbulence intensity within the container. When the static activation pressure is 0.7 bar, the pressures of the three vent diameters of 30, 50 and 70 dropped by 11.34%, 24.38% and 26.86% respectively. And the P_max11 at Φ = 1.0 and Φ = 1.4 are similar, while this phenomenon is not observed for other vent diameters. When the vent diameter was inconsistent with the duct diameter. the calculations of both standards were conservative. However, under these testing conditions (vent diameter: 30–70 mm, static activation pressure: 0.7–1.75 bar), the NPFA 68 calculations yield a conservatism range of 3.3–11, whereas EN14491 ranges from 1.6 to 15.7. The NPFA 68 results were more stable and concentrated, making these conditions more suitable for industry safety design in hydrogen venting.