韦尔型 f(Q,T)模型与ΛCDM 范式的统计与观测比较

IF 2.5 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS
Gaurav N. Gadbail , Himanshu Chaudhary , Amine Bouali , P.K. Sahoo
{"title":"韦尔型 f(Q,T)模型与ΛCDM 范式的统计与观测比较","authors":"Gaurav N. Gadbail ,&nbsp;Himanshu Chaudhary ,&nbsp;Amine Bouali ,&nbsp;P.K. Sahoo","doi":"10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study the <span><math><mi>f</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>Q</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>T</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> gravity in the framework of Weyl geometry (known as Weyl-type <span><math><mi>f</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>Q</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>T</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> gravity), where <em>Q</em> denotes the non-metricity scalar, and <em>T</em> denotes the energy-momentum tensor trace. In this work, we consider the <span><math><mi>f</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>Q</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>T</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> model, which is defined as <span><math><mi>f</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>Q</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>T</mi><mo>)</mo><mo>=</mo><mi>α</mi><msup><mrow><mi>Q</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>m</mi><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup><mo>+</mo><mfrac><mrow><mi>β</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>6</mn><msup><mrow><mi>κ</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></mfrac><mi>T</mi></math></span> and investigating two scenarios: (<em>I</em>) <span><math><mi>m</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn></math></span> (linear model) and <span><math><mo>(</mo><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> <span><math><mi>m</mi><mo>≠</mo><mn>0</mn></math></span> (nonlinear model). For both scenarios, we find the explicit solution for the field equations by using the barotropic equation of state as <span><math><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>w</mi><mi>ρ</mi></math></span>, where <em>w</em> is the equation-of-state (EoS) parameter. Further, we study the obtained solutions statistically using the <span><math><mi>P</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>t</mi><mi>h</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>o</mi><msup><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math></span> (Without SHOES Calibrated) dataset with 1701 data points. For both models, the best-fit values of model parameters for <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>−</mo><mi>σ</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mn>2</mn><mo>−</mo><mi>σ</mi></math></span> confidence level. The higher Hubble constant values in both models emphasize the presence of Tension. We statistically compare our models to the ΛCDM model using <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>χ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>m</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>n</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span>, <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>χ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span>, <em>AIC</em>, <span><math><mi>Δ</mi><mi>A</mi><mi>I</mi><mi>C</mi></math></span>, <em>BIC</em> and <span><math><mi>Δ</mi><mi>B</mi><mi>I</mi><mi>C</mi></math></span>. We also examine cosmological parameters such as deceleration and EoS parameters to determine the current acceleration expansion of the Universe. Furthermore, we test our model using <em>Om</em> diagnostic and compare it to the ΛCDM model to determine its dark energy profile. Finally, we draw the conclusion that statistically speaking, both linear and nonlinear models show good compatibility with the ΛCDM model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54712,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Physics B","volume":"1009 ","pages":"Article 116727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical and observation comparison of Weyl-type f(Q,T) models with the ΛCDM paradigm\",\"authors\":\"Gaurav N. Gadbail ,&nbsp;Himanshu Chaudhary ,&nbsp;Amine Bouali ,&nbsp;P.K. Sahoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We study the <span><math><mi>f</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>Q</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>T</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> gravity in the framework of Weyl geometry (known as Weyl-type <span><math><mi>f</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>Q</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>T</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> gravity), where <em>Q</em> denotes the non-metricity scalar, and <em>T</em> denotes the energy-momentum tensor trace. In this work, we consider the <span><math><mi>f</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>Q</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>T</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> model, which is defined as <span><math><mi>f</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>Q</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>T</mi><mo>)</mo><mo>=</mo><mi>α</mi><msup><mrow><mi>Q</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>m</mi><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup><mo>+</mo><mfrac><mrow><mi>β</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>6</mn><msup><mrow><mi>κ</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></mfrac><mi>T</mi></math></span> and investigating two scenarios: (<em>I</em>) <span><math><mi>m</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn></math></span> (linear model) and <span><math><mo>(</mo><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> <span><math><mi>m</mi><mo>≠</mo><mn>0</mn></math></span> (nonlinear model). For both scenarios, we find the explicit solution for the field equations by using the barotropic equation of state as <span><math><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>w</mi><mi>ρ</mi></math></span>, where <em>w</em> is the equation-of-state (EoS) parameter. Further, we study the obtained solutions statistically using the <span><math><mi>P</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>t</mi><mi>h</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>o</mi><msup><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math></span> (Without SHOES Calibrated) dataset with 1701 data points. For both models, the best-fit values of model parameters for <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>−</mo><mi>σ</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mn>2</mn><mo>−</mo><mi>σ</mi></math></span> confidence level. The higher Hubble constant values in both models emphasize the presence of Tension. We statistically compare our models to the ΛCDM model using <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>χ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>m</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>n</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span>, <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>χ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span>, <em>AIC</em>, <span><math><mi>Δ</mi><mi>A</mi><mi>I</mi><mi>C</mi></math></span>, <em>BIC</em> and <span><math><mi>Δ</mi><mi>B</mi><mi>I</mi><mi>C</mi></math></span>. We also examine cosmological parameters such as deceleration and EoS parameters to determine the current acceleration expansion of the Universe. Furthermore, we test our model using <em>Om</em> diagnostic and compare it to the ΛCDM model to determine its dark energy profile. Finally, we draw the conclusion that statistically speaking, both linear and nonlinear models show good compatibility with the ΛCDM model.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Physics B\",\"volume\":\"1009 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116727\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Physics B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321324002931\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Physics B","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321324002931","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究韦尔几何框架下的 f(Q,T) 引力(称为韦尔型 f(Q,T) 引力),其中 Q 表示非度量标量,T 表示能动张量迹。在这项工作中,我们考虑了 f(Q,T) 模型,其定义为 f(Q,T)=αQm+1+β6κ2T 并研究了两种情况:(I) m=0(线性模型)和 (II) m≠0 (非线性模型)。对于这两种情况,我们通过使用气压状态方程 p=wρ(其中 w 为状态方程参数)找到场方程的显式解。此外,我们还利用 Pantheon+(无 SHOES 校准)数据集的 1701 个数据点对所获得的解进行了统计研究。对于这两个模型,模型参数的最佳拟合值分别为 1-σ 和 2-σ 置信度。两个模型中较高的哈勃常数值都强调了 "张力 "的存在。我们用χmin2、χred2、AIC、ΔAIC、BIC 和 ΔBIC 统计比较了我们的模型和ΛCDM 模型。我们还研究了宇宙学参数,如减速和 EoS 参数,以确定当前宇宙的加速膨胀。此外,我们还利用 Om 诊断测试了我们的模型,并将其与ΛCDM 模型进行比较,以确定其暗能量曲线。最后,我们得出结论:从统计学角度看,线性和非线性模型都与 ΛCDM 模型显示出良好的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistical and observation comparison of Weyl-type f(Q,T) models with the ΛCDM paradigm
We study the f(Q,T) gravity in the framework of Weyl geometry (known as Weyl-type f(Q,T) gravity), where Q denotes the non-metricity scalar, and T denotes the energy-momentum tensor trace. In this work, we consider the f(Q,T) model, which is defined as f(Q,T)=αQm+1+β6κ2T and investigating two scenarios: (I) m=0 (linear model) and (II) m0 (nonlinear model). For both scenarios, we find the explicit solution for the field equations by using the barotropic equation of state as p=wρ, where w is the equation-of-state (EoS) parameter. Further, we study the obtained solutions statistically using the Pantheon+ (Without SHOES Calibrated) dataset with 1701 data points. For both models, the best-fit values of model parameters for 1σ and 2σ confidence level. The higher Hubble constant values in both models emphasize the presence of Tension. We statistically compare our models to the ΛCDM model using χmin2, χred2, AIC, ΔAIC, BIC and ΔBIC. We also examine cosmological parameters such as deceleration and EoS parameters to determine the current acceleration expansion of the Universe. Furthermore, we test our model using Om diagnostic and compare it to the ΛCDM model to determine its dark energy profile. Finally, we draw the conclusion that statistically speaking, both linear and nonlinear models show good compatibility with the ΛCDM model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Physics B
Nuclear Physics B 物理-物理:粒子与场物理
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
302
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Physics B focuses on the domain of high energy physics, quantum field theory, statistical systems, and mathematical physics, and includes four main sections: high energy physics - phenomenology, high energy physics - theory, high energy physics - experiment, and quantum field theory, statistical systems, and mathematical physics. The emphasis is on original research papers (Frontiers Articles or Full Length Articles), but Review Articles are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信