作为绿色创新指标的绿色专利和绿色商标

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Jörn Block , Darius Lambrecht , Tom Willeke , Marco Cucculelli , Damiano Meloni
{"title":"作为绿色创新指标的绿色专利和绿色商标","authors":"Jörn Block ,&nbsp;Darius Lambrecht ,&nbsp;Tom Willeke ,&nbsp;Marco Cucculelli ,&nbsp;Damiano Meloni","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Identifying green innovations and the firms that generate them is crucial for understanding the role of technology and innovation in the transition to a green economy. Information from intellectual property rights, particularly patent and trademark data, offer an objective, transparent, fast and cost-effective way to identify green innovations, especially when compared to traditional survey-based methods. However, the validity of this identification method is not yet fully established. Not all innovations can be protected through intellectual property rights and some firms may deliberately choose not to pursue formal protection. This study uses patent, trademark and survey data from two distinct samples of SMEs and mid-cap firms from Germany and Italy to investigate whether green patents and green trademarks can effectively identify green innovative firms. The findings reveal that relying solely on patent- and trademark-based measures of green innovation leads to the exclusion of many green innovative firms. In the larger and more representative Italian sample, we observe that only about 1 % of firms have filed a green patent, and 1.65 % have registered a green trademark in the five years prior to the survey. While green trademarks remain a valuable indicator of various types of green innovation, green patents do not prove to be a strong measure of green innovation—at least in a broad industry sample. The predictive power of green trademarks is strongest for identifying green product innovation, particularly within samples of small yet established firms. In contrast, the predictive value of green patents diminishes when considering a firm's total patent portfolio. The findings of our study are relevant for policymakers and investors seeking to identify green innovative firms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 105138"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green patents and green trademarks as indicators of green innovation\",\"authors\":\"Jörn Block ,&nbsp;Darius Lambrecht ,&nbsp;Tom Willeke ,&nbsp;Marco Cucculelli ,&nbsp;Damiano Meloni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Identifying green innovations and the firms that generate them is crucial for understanding the role of technology and innovation in the transition to a green economy. Information from intellectual property rights, particularly patent and trademark data, offer an objective, transparent, fast and cost-effective way to identify green innovations, especially when compared to traditional survey-based methods. However, the validity of this identification method is not yet fully established. Not all innovations can be protected through intellectual property rights and some firms may deliberately choose not to pursue formal protection. This study uses patent, trademark and survey data from two distinct samples of SMEs and mid-cap firms from Germany and Italy to investigate whether green patents and green trademarks can effectively identify green innovative firms. The findings reveal that relying solely on patent- and trademark-based measures of green innovation leads to the exclusion of many green innovative firms. In the larger and more representative Italian sample, we observe that only about 1 % of firms have filed a green patent, and 1.65 % have registered a green trademark in the five years prior to the survey. While green trademarks remain a valuable indicator of various types of green innovation, green patents do not prove to be a strong measure of green innovation—at least in a broad industry sample. The predictive power of green trademarks is strongest for identifying green product innovation, particularly within samples of small yet established firms. In contrast, the predictive value of green patents diminishes when considering a firm's total patent portfolio. The findings of our study are relevant for policymakers and investors seeking to identify green innovative firms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Policy\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 105138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001872\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001872","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要了解技术和创新在向绿色经济转型中的作用,识别绿色创新及其产生企业至关重要。来自知识产权的信息,尤其是专利和商标数据,为识别绿色创新提供了一种客观、透明、快速和具有成本效益的方法,尤其是与传统的调查方法相比。然而,这种识别方法的有效性尚未完全确定。并不是所有的创新都能通过知识产权得到保护,有些企业可能故意选择不寻求正式保护。本研究利用来自德国和意大利两个不同样本的中小企业和中型企业的专利、商标和调查数据,研究绿色专利和绿色商标是否能有效识别绿色创新企业。研究结果表明,仅仅依靠基于专利和商标的绿色创新衡量标准,会导致许多绿色创新企业被排除在外。在规模更大、更具代表性的意大利样本中,我们发现在调查之前的五年中,只有约 1% 的企业申请了绿色专利,1.65% 的企业注册了绿色商标。虽然绿色商标仍然是各类绿色创新的重要指标,但绿色专利并不能有力地衡量绿色创新--至少在广泛的行业样本中是如此。绿色商标对识别绿色产品创新的预测能力最强,尤其是在小型但已建立的企业样本中。相比之下,如果考虑到企业的全部专利组合,绿色专利的预测价值就会降低。我们的研究结果对决策者和投资者识别绿色创新企业具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green patents and green trademarks as indicators of green innovation
Identifying green innovations and the firms that generate them is crucial for understanding the role of technology and innovation in the transition to a green economy. Information from intellectual property rights, particularly patent and trademark data, offer an objective, transparent, fast and cost-effective way to identify green innovations, especially when compared to traditional survey-based methods. However, the validity of this identification method is not yet fully established. Not all innovations can be protected through intellectual property rights and some firms may deliberately choose not to pursue formal protection. This study uses patent, trademark and survey data from two distinct samples of SMEs and mid-cap firms from Germany and Italy to investigate whether green patents and green trademarks can effectively identify green innovative firms. The findings reveal that relying solely on patent- and trademark-based measures of green innovation leads to the exclusion of many green innovative firms. In the larger and more representative Italian sample, we observe that only about 1 % of firms have filed a green patent, and 1.65 % have registered a green trademark in the five years prior to the survey. While green trademarks remain a valuable indicator of various types of green innovation, green patents do not prove to be a strong measure of green innovation—at least in a broad industry sample. The predictive power of green trademarks is strongest for identifying green product innovation, particularly within samples of small yet established firms. In contrast, the predictive value of green patents diminishes when considering a firm's total patent portfolio. The findings of our study are relevant for policymakers and investors seeking to identify green innovative firms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信