对社会负责的电子商务供应链:销售模式偏好和商店品牌介绍

IF 8.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Xinxin Zhang , Xiuyi Zhang , Junran Huang
{"title":"对社会负责的电子商务供应链:销售模式偏好和商店品牌介绍","authors":"Xinxin Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiuyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Junran Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Motivated by the widespread adoption of corporate social responsibility (CSR), we investigate a socially responsible e-commerce supply chain where the E-platform owns a store brand product and supports online sales of the manufacturer’s product under agency selling or reselling. The socially responsible firm has a mixed objective of its profit and consumer surplus. We explore how the firms’ CSR concern affects their decisions and economic performance. Our results contradict conventional wisdom which suggests that a firm has to sacrifice profitability to achieve social responsibility and that a firm’s CSR concern benefits its supply chain partner. Instead, we show that under agency selling, the E-platform’s concern on consumers can improve its own profit while harming the manufacturer’s profit. Furthermore, when both firms are socially responsible, their consumer concern can improve their profits simultaneously under reselling, leading to a “doing well by doing good” effect. As horizontal or vertical differentiation between the two products increases, this effect is more likely to be realized. Regarding firms’ sales mode preferences, in a traditional for-profit supply chain, agency selling is the only mode preferred by both parties. However, in a socially responsible supply chain, they can achieve preference alignment under either agency selling or reselling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 103829"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socially responsible e-commerce supply chains: Sales mode preference and store brand introduction\",\"authors\":\"Xinxin Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiuyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Junran Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Motivated by the widespread adoption of corporate social responsibility (CSR), we investigate a socially responsible e-commerce supply chain where the E-platform owns a store brand product and supports online sales of the manufacturer’s product under agency selling or reselling. The socially responsible firm has a mixed objective of its profit and consumer surplus. We explore how the firms’ CSR concern affects their decisions and economic performance. Our results contradict conventional wisdom which suggests that a firm has to sacrifice profitability to achieve social responsibility and that a firm’s CSR concern benefits its supply chain partner. Instead, we show that under agency selling, the E-platform’s concern on consumers can improve its own profit while harming the manufacturer’s profit. Furthermore, when both firms are socially responsible, their consumer concern can improve their profits simultaneously under reselling, leading to a “doing well by doing good” effect. As horizontal or vertical differentiation between the two products increases, this effect is more likely to be realized. Regarding firms’ sales mode preferences, in a traditional for-profit supply chain, agency selling is the only mode preferred by both parties. However, in a socially responsible supply chain, they can achieve preference alignment under either agency selling or reselling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review\",\"volume\":\"193 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103829\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524004204\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524004204","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在企业社会责任(CSR)被广泛采用的推动下,我们研究了一个具有社会责任感的电子商务供应链,在该供应链中,电子平台拥有商店品牌产品,并以代理销售或转售的方式支持制造商产品的在线销售。具有社会责任感的企业具有利润和消费者剩余的混合目标。我们探讨了企业社会责任如何影响其决策和经济表现。我们的研究结果与传统观点相悖,传统观点认为企业必须牺牲利润率才能实现社会责任,而且企业的社会责任关注会使其供应链伙伴受益。相反,我们的研究表明,在代理销售的情况下,电子平台对消费者的关注可以提高自身的利润,同时损害制造商的利润。此外,当两家公司都具有社会责任感时,它们对消费者的关注可以在转售过程中同时提高利润,从而产生 "行善积德 "效应。随着两种产品之间的横向或纵向差异的增加,这种效应更有可能实现。关于企业的销售模式偏好,在传统的营利性供应链中,代理销售是双方都偏好的唯一模式。然而,在社会责任供应链中,无论是代理销售还是转售,双方都可以实现偏好一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socially responsible e-commerce supply chains: Sales mode preference and store brand introduction
Motivated by the widespread adoption of corporate social responsibility (CSR), we investigate a socially responsible e-commerce supply chain where the E-platform owns a store brand product and supports online sales of the manufacturer’s product under agency selling or reselling. The socially responsible firm has a mixed objective of its profit and consumer surplus. We explore how the firms’ CSR concern affects their decisions and economic performance. Our results contradict conventional wisdom which suggests that a firm has to sacrifice profitability to achieve social responsibility and that a firm’s CSR concern benefits its supply chain partner. Instead, we show that under agency selling, the E-platform’s concern on consumers can improve its own profit while harming the manufacturer’s profit. Furthermore, when both firms are socially responsible, their consumer concern can improve their profits simultaneously under reselling, leading to a “doing well by doing good” effect. As horizontal or vertical differentiation between the two products increases, this effect is more likely to be realized. Regarding firms’ sales mode preferences, in a traditional for-profit supply chain, agency selling is the only mode preferred by both parties. However, in a socially responsible supply chain, they can achieve preference alignment under either agency selling or reselling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信