{"title":"自闭症儿童和青少年感觉处理评估方法的系统回顾","authors":"Sandra Brouche , Fabienne Cazalis , Natalie Rigal","doi":"10.1016/j.neurenf.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sensory processing has been a diagnostic criterion for autism spectrum condition since the fifth version of the DSM. However, there is no consensus regarding assessment methods. This article is a systematic review of methods for assessing sensory processing in children and adolescents with autism aged between 0 and 18 years, with three objectives: (1) to identify and organize, using PRISMA, the different methods used in scientific articles for assessing sensory processing in autism; (2) to discuss their advantages and limitations by using the COSMIN checklist; (3) to suggest possible recommendations. Analysis of the 142 articles selected revealed five types of assessment method: questionnaires, psychophysical measurements, electroencephalography, neuroimaging and observation. Questionnaires were the most frequently cited clinical method, while psychophysical tests were the most represented. Each method has limitations in terms of individual utilization due to non-standardized procedures and varied investigation targets. While this systematic review makes it possible to better identify the methods used in the clinical and research fields for sensory processing specificities in children and adolescents on the spectrum, it also highlights the fact that the lack of consensus on assessments is partly due to a problem of definition of this process. Future research will need to agree on a characterization of sensory processing in order to develop a common assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39666,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatrie de l''Enfance et de l''Adolescence","volume":"72 7","pages":"Pages 305-321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revue systématique des méthodes d’évaluation du traitement sensoriel chez les enfants et adolescents autistes\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Brouche , Fabienne Cazalis , Natalie Rigal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurenf.2024.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sensory processing has been a diagnostic criterion for autism spectrum condition since the fifth version of the DSM. However, there is no consensus regarding assessment methods. This article is a systematic review of methods for assessing sensory processing in children and adolescents with autism aged between 0 and 18 years, with three objectives: (1) to identify and organize, using PRISMA, the different methods used in scientific articles for assessing sensory processing in autism; (2) to discuss their advantages and limitations by using the COSMIN checklist; (3) to suggest possible recommendations. Analysis of the 142 articles selected revealed five types of assessment method: questionnaires, psychophysical measurements, electroencephalography, neuroimaging and observation. Questionnaires were the most frequently cited clinical method, while psychophysical tests were the most represented. Each method has limitations in terms of individual utilization due to non-standardized procedures and varied investigation targets. While this systematic review makes it possible to better identify the methods used in the clinical and research fields for sensory processing specificities in children and adolescents on the spectrum, it also highlights the fact that the lack of consensus on assessments is partly due to a problem of definition of this process. Future research will need to agree on a characterization of sensory processing in order to develop a common assessment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychiatrie de l''Enfance et de l''Adolescence\",\"volume\":\"72 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 305-321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychiatrie de l''Enfance et de l''Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0222961724001132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatrie de l''Enfance et de l''Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0222961724001132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Revue systématique des méthodes d’évaluation du traitement sensoriel chez les enfants et adolescents autistes
Sensory processing has been a diagnostic criterion for autism spectrum condition since the fifth version of the DSM. However, there is no consensus regarding assessment methods. This article is a systematic review of methods for assessing sensory processing in children and adolescents with autism aged between 0 and 18 years, with three objectives: (1) to identify and organize, using PRISMA, the different methods used in scientific articles for assessing sensory processing in autism; (2) to discuss their advantages and limitations by using the COSMIN checklist; (3) to suggest possible recommendations. Analysis of the 142 articles selected revealed five types of assessment method: questionnaires, psychophysical measurements, electroencephalography, neuroimaging and observation. Questionnaires were the most frequently cited clinical method, while psychophysical tests were the most represented. Each method has limitations in terms of individual utilization due to non-standardized procedures and varied investigation targets. While this systematic review makes it possible to better identify the methods used in the clinical and research fields for sensory processing specificities in children and adolescents on the spectrum, it also highlights the fact that the lack of consensus on assessments is partly due to a problem of definition of this process. Future research will need to agree on a characterization of sensory processing in order to develop a common assessment.
期刊介绍:
Organ of the Société française de psychiatrie de enfant et de adolescent, Neuropsychiatrie de enfance et de adolescence tackles all fields of child-adolescent psychiatry and offers a link between field and clinical work. As a reference and training tool for students and practitioners, the journal publishes original papers in child psychiatry as well as book reviews and conference reports. Each issue also offers a calendar of the main events dealing with the speciality.