了解囊性纤维化护理模式变化的可接受性

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Michael Doumit , Verity Pacey , Adam Jaffe , Kelly Gray
{"title":"了解囊性纤维化护理模式变化的可接受性","authors":"Michael Doumit ,&nbsp;Verity Pacey ,&nbsp;Adam Jaffe ,&nbsp;Kelly Gray","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cystic fibrosis (CF) outpatient care has evolved into a hybrid model, incorporating telehealth and face-to-face reviews. This study explores the acceptability of the hybrid model of care from the perspective of people with CF and parents of children with CF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>People with CF and parents of children with CF from eight Australian CF centres participated in semi-structured interviews. Maximum variation sampling sought participants from varied socioeconomic levels and geographical locations. The interview guide and thematic analysis utilised the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to explore domains of acceptability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten adults and 16 parents of children with CF were interviewed. The major themes from the interviews aligned with the TFA domains. These were [1]: life is easier with a hybrid model of care [2], hybrid care is effective but not comprehensive [3], hybrid care needs to adapt to individual needs [4], confidence in hybrid care is determined by internal and external factors [5], hybrid care is easy to engage in[6] accepting hybrid care involves compromising valued aspects of face-to-face care [7], hybrid care reduces infection risk and helps normalise life.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The addition of telehealth to the traditional model of CF care is acceptable overall. The level of acceptability is variable and is determined by the willingness to compromise valued aspects of face-to-face care to obtain the convenience, safety and normality that receiving part of care through telehealth allows. Therefore, the model should be personalised in consultation with people with CF and parents of children with CF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 107847"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the acceptability of the changing model of care in cystic fibrosis\",\"authors\":\"Michael Doumit ,&nbsp;Verity Pacey ,&nbsp;Adam Jaffe ,&nbsp;Kelly Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cystic fibrosis (CF) outpatient care has evolved into a hybrid model, incorporating telehealth and face-to-face reviews. This study explores the acceptability of the hybrid model of care from the perspective of people with CF and parents of children with CF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>People with CF and parents of children with CF from eight Australian CF centres participated in semi-structured interviews. Maximum variation sampling sought participants from varied socioeconomic levels and geographical locations. The interview guide and thematic analysis utilised the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to explore domains of acceptability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten adults and 16 parents of children with CF were interviewed. The major themes from the interviews aligned with the TFA domains. These were [1]: life is easier with a hybrid model of care [2], hybrid care is effective but not comprehensive [3], hybrid care needs to adapt to individual needs [4], confidence in hybrid care is determined by internal and external factors [5], hybrid care is easy to engage in[6] accepting hybrid care involves compromising valued aspects of face-to-face care [7], hybrid care reduces infection risk and helps normalise life.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The addition of telehealth to the traditional model of CF care is acceptable overall. The level of acceptability is variable and is determined by the willingness to compromise valued aspects of face-to-face care to obtain the convenience, safety and normality that receiving part of care through telehealth allows. Therefore, the model should be personalised in consultation with people with CF and parents of children with CF.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"234 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107847\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124003226\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124003226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景囊性纤维化(CF)门诊治疗已发展成为一种混合模式,其中包括远程医疗和面对面复查。本研究从CF患者和CF患儿家长的角度探讨了混合护理模式的可接受性。最大差异抽样寻求来自不同社会经济水平和地理位置的参与者。访谈指南和主题分析采用了可接受性理论框架(TFA)来探讨可接受性的各个领域。访谈的主要主题与 TFA 领域一致。这些主题是[1]:混合护理模式使生活更轻松[2],混合护理有效但不全面[3],混合护理需要适应个人需求[4],对混合护理的信心由内部和外部因素决定[5],混合护理易于参与[6],接受混合护理需要牺牲面对面护理的重要方面[7],混合护理降低感染风险并有助于生活正常化。可接受性的高低不一,取决于患者是否愿意牺牲面对面护理的重要方面,以获得通过远程医疗接受部分护理所带来的便利、安全和正常生活。因此,应与 CF 患者和 CF 儿童的父母协商,制定个性化的护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the acceptability of the changing model of care in cystic fibrosis

Background

Cystic fibrosis (CF) outpatient care has evolved into a hybrid model, incorporating telehealth and face-to-face reviews. This study explores the acceptability of the hybrid model of care from the perspective of people with CF and parents of children with CF.

Methods

People with CF and parents of children with CF from eight Australian CF centres participated in semi-structured interviews. Maximum variation sampling sought participants from varied socioeconomic levels and geographical locations. The interview guide and thematic analysis utilised the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to explore domains of acceptability.

Results

Ten adults and 16 parents of children with CF were interviewed. The major themes from the interviews aligned with the TFA domains. These were [1]: life is easier with a hybrid model of care [2], hybrid care is effective but not comprehensive [3], hybrid care needs to adapt to individual needs [4], confidence in hybrid care is determined by internal and external factors [5], hybrid care is easy to engage in[6] accepting hybrid care involves compromising valued aspects of face-to-face care [7], hybrid care reduces infection risk and helps normalise life.

Conclusion

The addition of telehealth to the traditional model of CF care is acceptable overall. The level of acceptability is variable and is determined by the willingness to compromise valued aspects of face-to-face care to obtain the convenience, safety and normality that receiving part of care through telehealth allows. Therefore, the model should be personalised in consultation with people with CF and parents of children with CF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信