Carolina Mendonça de Almeida Malzoni, Jovânia Alves Oliveira, Lélio Fernando Fereira Soares, Marcella Cunha Chimirri, Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida, Suzane Cristina Pigossi, Elcio Marcantonio Junior
{"title":"用于颌面骨重建的三维打印生物可吸收支架:范围综述。","authors":"Carolina Mendonça de Almeida Malzoni, Jovânia Alves Oliveira, Lélio Fernando Fereira Soares, Marcella Cunha Chimirri, Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida, Suzane Cristina Pigossi, Elcio Marcantonio Junior","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202406112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of current advancements in virtual planning and custom-made 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffolds, and to evaluate their clinical outcomes in maxillofacial reconstructive surgeries. Electronic searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted for publications up to June 2024. Included in the review were reports evaluating patients who underwent maxillofacial bone defect reconstruction using virtual planning and custom-made 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffolds. Data on postoperative complications, new bone formation, scaffold resorption, dental implant success/survival, and patient satisfaction were collected. The electronic search found 5799 results (3438 unique citations). A total of 54 studies were evaluated for full-text reading, of which 41 were excluded based on the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies (6 case reports, 5 case series, one prospective clinical study and one randomized clinical trial) were included. These studies assessed the effectiveness of 3D-printed scaffolds in reconstructing maxillofacial defects, bone augmentation for dental implant placement, and regeneration of periosseous defects. Most of the 3D-printed scaffolds were biocompatible and did not cause local or systemic adverse events. However, some postoperative complications were reported, including graft exposure, wound dehiscence, and local infection. Overall, the 3D-printed scaffolds demonstrated favorable dimensional compatibility with deformities, provided durable support, promoted bone formation, achieved adequate bone union with host bone tissues, and supported dental implant placement without additional guided bone regeneration. In conclusion, custom-made 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffolds, guided by virtual planning, present a promising option for maxillofacial reconstruction due to their accuracy, osteoconductivity, and biocompatible properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"e246112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-dimensional printed bioresorbable scaffold for maxillofacial bone reconstruction: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Mendonça de Almeida Malzoni, Jovânia Alves Oliveira, Lélio Fernando Fereira Soares, Marcella Cunha Chimirri, Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida, Suzane Cristina Pigossi, Elcio Marcantonio Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6440202406112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of current advancements in virtual planning and custom-made 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffolds, and to evaluate their clinical outcomes in maxillofacial reconstructive surgeries. Electronic searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted for publications up to June 2024. Included in the review were reports evaluating patients who underwent maxillofacial bone defect reconstruction using virtual planning and custom-made 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffolds. Data on postoperative complications, new bone formation, scaffold resorption, dental implant success/survival, and patient satisfaction were collected. The electronic search found 5799 results (3438 unique citations). A total of 54 studies were evaluated for full-text reading, of which 41 were excluded based on the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies (6 case reports, 5 case series, one prospective clinical study and one randomized clinical trial) were included. These studies assessed the effectiveness of 3D-printed scaffolds in reconstructing maxillofacial defects, bone augmentation for dental implant placement, and regeneration of periosseous defects. Most of the 3D-printed scaffolds were biocompatible and did not cause local or systemic adverse events. However, some postoperative complications were reported, including graft exposure, wound dehiscence, and local infection. Overall, the 3D-printed scaffolds demonstrated favorable dimensional compatibility with deformities, provided durable support, promoted bone formation, achieved adequate bone union with host bone tissues, and supported dental implant placement without additional guided bone regeneration. In conclusion, custom-made 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffolds, guided by virtual planning, present a promising option for maxillofacial reconstruction due to their accuracy, osteoconductivity, and biocompatible properties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"e246112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506235/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202406112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202406112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本范围综述旨在概述虚拟规划和定制 3D 打印生物可吸收支架的当前进展,并评估其在颌面部整形手术中的临床效果。本研究对 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中截至 2024 年 6 月的出版物进行了电子检索。综述包括对使用虚拟规划和定制的 3D 打印生物可吸收支架进行颌面骨缺损重建的患者进行评估的报告。收集的数据包括术后并发症、新骨形成、支架吸收、牙科植入成功率/存活率以及患者满意度。电子检索发现了 5799 条结果(3438 条唯一引用)。共对 54 项研究进行了全文阅读评估,根据纳入标准排除了其中的 41 项研究。共纳入 13 项研究(6 项病例报告、5 项系列病例、1 项前瞻性临床研究和 1 项随机临床试验)。这些研究评估了三维打印支架在重建颌面部缺损、牙种植体植入的骨增量以及骨膜缺损再生方面的效果。大多数三维打印支架具有生物相容性,不会引起局部或全身不良反应。不过,也有一些术后并发症的报道,包括移植物暴露、伤口开裂和局部感染。总之,三维打印支架与畸形的尺寸相容性良好,提供了持久的支撑,促进了骨形成,与宿主骨组织实现了充分的骨结合,无需额外的引导骨再生即可支持牙科植入物的植入。总之,在虚拟规划指导下定制的三维打印生物可吸收支架因其精确性、骨传导性和生物相容性,为颌面部重建提供了一种前景广阔的选择。
Three-dimensional printed bioresorbable scaffold for maxillofacial bone reconstruction: A Scoping Review.
This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of current advancements in virtual planning and custom-made 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffolds, and to evaluate their clinical outcomes in maxillofacial reconstructive surgeries. Electronic searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted for publications up to June 2024. Included in the review were reports evaluating patients who underwent maxillofacial bone defect reconstruction using virtual planning and custom-made 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffolds. Data on postoperative complications, new bone formation, scaffold resorption, dental implant success/survival, and patient satisfaction were collected. The electronic search found 5799 results (3438 unique citations). A total of 54 studies were evaluated for full-text reading, of which 41 were excluded based on the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies (6 case reports, 5 case series, one prospective clinical study and one randomized clinical trial) were included. These studies assessed the effectiveness of 3D-printed scaffolds in reconstructing maxillofacial defects, bone augmentation for dental implant placement, and regeneration of periosseous defects. Most of the 3D-printed scaffolds were biocompatible and did not cause local or systemic adverse events. However, some postoperative complications were reported, including graft exposure, wound dehiscence, and local infection. Overall, the 3D-printed scaffolds demonstrated favorable dimensional compatibility with deformities, provided durable support, promoted bone formation, achieved adequate bone union with host bone tissues, and supported dental implant placement without additional guided bone regeneration. In conclusion, custom-made 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffolds, guided by virtual planning, present a promising option for maxillofacial reconstruction due to their accuracy, osteoconductivity, and biocompatible properties.