使用临床分光光度计进行阴影测量时定位导色的影响。

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202405995
Joao Arthur Dumke, Lauren Arrua Fantine, Suzana Nogueira, Bruna Gaidarji, Danielle Zorzo Righes, Bibiana Gabardo Perez Mariano da Rocha, Leticia Brandao Durand
{"title":"使用临床分光光度计进行阴影测量时定位导色的影响。","authors":"Joao Arthur Dumke, Lauren Arrua Fantine, Suzana Nogueira, Bruna Gaidarji, Danielle Zorzo Righes, Bibiana Gabardo Perez Mariano da Rocha, Leticia Brandao Durand","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202405995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the color of positioning guides on the CIEL*a*b* color coordinates of ceramic, resin composite and bovine tooth surfaces measured by a clinical spectrophotometer. Positioning guides (n=10) in different colors (translucent, purple, yellow, green and, blue) were made for each surface (ceramic, resin composite and bovine tooth). The CIEL*a*b* color coordinates were measured with the positioning guides and with no positioning guide (control group). The ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*, ΔE*ab, and ΔE00 were calculated between the control group and the different groups. The CIEL*a*b* color coordinates were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc Tukey test (α=0.05). Color differences were interpreted using the 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability visual thresholds. Positioning guides with different colors presented significant differences for all surfaces and color coordinates. ΔE*ab, and ΔE00 mean values for all surfaces and positioning guide colors exceeded the acceptability visual thresholds, except for the bovine tooth surface measured with the green positioning guide. The shade measurement was affected by the color of the positioning guides regardless of the surface that was evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"e245995"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Positioning Guide Color on Shade Measurements Using a Clinical Spectrophotometer.\",\"authors\":\"Joao Arthur Dumke, Lauren Arrua Fantine, Suzana Nogueira, Bruna Gaidarji, Danielle Zorzo Righes, Bibiana Gabardo Perez Mariano da Rocha, Leticia Brandao Durand\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6440202405995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the color of positioning guides on the CIEL*a*b* color coordinates of ceramic, resin composite and bovine tooth surfaces measured by a clinical spectrophotometer. Positioning guides (n=10) in different colors (translucent, purple, yellow, green and, blue) were made for each surface (ceramic, resin composite and bovine tooth). The CIEL*a*b* color coordinates were measured with the positioning guides and with no positioning guide (control group). The ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*, ΔE*ab, and ΔE00 were calculated between the control group and the different groups. The CIEL*a*b* color coordinates were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc Tukey test (α=0.05). Color differences were interpreted using the 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability visual thresholds. Positioning guides with different colors presented significant differences for all surfaces and color coordinates. ΔE*ab, and ΔE00 mean values for all surfaces and positioning guide colors exceeded the acceptability visual thresholds, except for the bovine tooth surface measured with the green positioning guide. The shade measurement was affected by the color of the positioning guides regardless of the surface that was evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"e245995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520490/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202405995\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202405995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨定位导板的颜色对用临床分光光度计测量的陶瓷牙、树脂复合牙和牛牙表面的 CIEL*a*b* 色坐标的影响。为每种牙面(陶瓷、树脂复合材料和牛牙)制作了不同颜色(半透明、紫色、黄色、绿色和蓝色)的定位导板(n=10)。使用定位导板和不使用定位导板(对照组)测量 CIEL*a*b* 色坐标。计算对照组和不同组之间的 ΔL*、Δa*、Δb*、ΔE*ab 和 ΔE00。CIEL*a*b*色坐标采用单因素方差分析,然后进行事后Tukey检验(α=0.05)。颜色差异使用 50:50% 的可感知性和可接受性视觉阈值进行解释。不同颜色的定位导板在所有表面和颜色坐标上都有显著差异。除使用绿色定位导板测量的牛牙表面外,所有表面和定位导板颜色的 ΔE*ab 和 ΔE00 平均值都超过了可接受性视觉阈值。无论评估哪个表面,色调测量都会受到定位导板颜色的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Positioning Guide Color on Shade Measurements Using a Clinical Spectrophotometer.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the color of positioning guides on the CIEL*a*b* color coordinates of ceramic, resin composite and bovine tooth surfaces measured by a clinical spectrophotometer. Positioning guides (n=10) in different colors (translucent, purple, yellow, green and, blue) were made for each surface (ceramic, resin composite and bovine tooth). The CIEL*a*b* color coordinates were measured with the positioning guides and with no positioning guide (control group). The ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*, ΔE*ab, and ΔE00 were calculated between the control group and the different groups. The CIEL*a*b* color coordinates were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc Tukey test (α=0.05). Color differences were interpreted using the 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability visual thresholds. Positioning guides with different colors presented significant differences for all surfaces and color coordinates. ΔE*ab, and ΔE00 mean values for all surfaces and positioning guide colors exceeded the acceptability visual thresholds, except for the bovine tooth surface measured with the green positioning guide. The shade measurement was affected by the color of the positioning guides regardless of the surface that was evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信