教授与大学生在学习过程中的交流质量。

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202406081
Carlos Estrela, Marcela Gimenes B Oshita, Matheus F Perazzo, Ana Helena G Alencar, Júlio A Silva, Lucas Ra Estrela, Luciano Ta Cintra, Cyntia Ra Estrela
{"title":"教授与大学生在学习过程中的交流质量。","authors":"Carlos Estrela, Marcela Gimenes B Oshita, Matheus F Perazzo, Ana Helena G Alencar, Júlio A Silva, Lucas Ra Estrela, Luciano Ta Cintra, Cyntia Ra Estrela","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202406081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Teaching requires the incorporation of communication skills, and these potentials may affect the outcomes of the learning process. This study evaluated the quality of communication between professors and students during the process of learning Dentistry. A questionnaire was developed and applied to evaluate their perceptions about their communications in an undergraduate Dentistry course. The questionnaire had ten items to analyze professors' self-perception and ten for students' perceptions, using a Likert-like scale and a final open question. During its construction, it was sent to five specialists to analyze content validity. The open question gathered suggestions to improve and intensify communications effectively and to identify vulnerabilities. Total scores ranged from 10 to 50, with 10 as the worst perception, and 50, as the best. The scores were calculated by adding all answers and then dividing that sum by the total number of items. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to evaluate the instrument's internal consistency. The level of significance was set at 0.05%. The Student t-test was used to determine differences between groups. Professors' self-perceptions and students' perceptions of the quality of communication of the university teaching staff during the student's learning process had statistically significant differences. Professors classified their ability to communicate when emitting and receiving information as satisfactory. Students, however, did not fully agree with them, particularly on the items about receiving information. The perceptions identified in this study may lead to a new direction in the communicative behavior of professors and students.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"e246081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Communication Between Professors and University Students in the Process of Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Estrela, Marcela Gimenes B Oshita, Matheus F Perazzo, Ana Helena G Alencar, Júlio A Silva, Lucas Ra Estrela, Luciano Ta Cintra, Cyntia Ra Estrela\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6440202406081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Teaching requires the incorporation of communication skills, and these potentials may affect the outcomes of the learning process. This study evaluated the quality of communication between professors and students during the process of learning Dentistry. A questionnaire was developed and applied to evaluate their perceptions about their communications in an undergraduate Dentistry course. The questionnaire had ten items to analyze professors' self-perception and ten for students' perceptions, using a Likert-like scale and a final open question. During its construction, it was sent to five specialists to analyze content validity. The open question gathered suggestions to improve and intensify communications effectively and to identify vulnerabilities. Total scores ranged from 10 to 50, with 10 as the worst perception, and 50, as the best. The scores were calculated by adding all answers and then dividing that sum by the total number of items. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to evaluate the instrument's internal consistency. The level of significance was set at 0.05%. The Student t-test was used to determine differences between groups. Professors' self-perceptions and students' perceptions of the quality of communication of the university teaching staff during the student's learning process had statistically significant differences. Professors classified their ability to communicate when emitting and receiving information as satisfactory. Students, however, did not fully agree with them, particularly on the items about receiving information. The perceptions identified in this study may lead to a new direction in the communicative behavior of professors and students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"e246081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520509/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202406081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202406081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教学需要融入沟通技巧,而这些潜能可能会影响学习过程的结果。本研究评估了教授与学生在学习口腔医学过程中的沟通质量。研究编制了一份问卷,用于评估学生对口腔医学本科课程中教授与学生沟通的看法。该问卷有十个项目用于分析教授的自我认知,十个项目用于分析学生的认知,采用李克特量表和最后一个开放式问题。在制作过程中,问卷被送往五位专家处进行内容效度分析。开放式问题收集了关于改进和加强有效沟通以及找出薄弱环节的建议。总分从 10 分到 50 分不等,10 分为最差看法,50 分为最佳看法。分数的计算方法是将所有答案相加,然后用总分除以项目总数。计算 Cronbach's alpha 是为了评估工具的内部一致性。显著性水平设定为 0.05%。学生 t 检验用于确定组间差异。在学生学习过程中,教授对大学教师沟通质量的自我认知和学生对大学教师沟通质量的认知在统计学上有显著差异。教授们认为自己在发送和接收信息时的沟通能力令人满意。然而,学生并不完全同意他们的看法,尤其是在有关接收信息的项目上。本研究中发现的看法可能会为教授和学生的交流行为带来新的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Communication Between Professors and University Students in the Process of Learning.

Teaching requires the incorporation of communication skills, and these potentials may affect the outcomes of the learning process. This study evaluated the quality of communication between professors and students during the process of learning Dentistry. A questionnaire was developed and applied to evaluate their perceptions about their communications in an undergraduate Dentistry course. The questionnaire had ten items to analyze professors' self-perception and ten for students' perceptions, using a Likert-like scale and a final open question. During its construction, it was sent to five specialists to analyze content validity. The open question gathered suggestions to improve and intensify communications effectively and to identify vulnerabilities. Total scores ranged from 10 to 50, with 10 as the worst perception, and 50, as the best. The scores were calculated by adding all answers and then dividing that sum by the total number of items. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to evaluate the instrument's internal consistency. The level of significance was set at 0.05%. The Student t-test was used to determine differences between groups. Professors' self-perceptions and students' perceptions of the quality of communication of the university teaching staff during the student's learning process had statistically significant differences. Professors classified their ability to communicate when emitting and receiving information as satisfactory. Students, however, did not fully agree with them, particularly on the items about receiving information. The perceptions identified in this study may lead to a new direction in the communicative behavior of professors and students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信