利用婴儿期形态分割的个体差异预测 3 岁时的语言成果。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Jinyoung Jo , Megha Sundara , Canaan Breiss
{"title":"利用婴儿期形态分割的个体差异预测 3 岁时的语言成果。","authors":"Jinyoung Jo ,&nbsp;Megha Sundara ,&nbsp;Canaan Breiss","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2024.102001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In previous research, infants’ performance on speech perception tasks has been shown to predict later language outcomes, typically vocabulary size. We used Bayesian analyses to model trial-level looking time behavior of individual infants on morphological segmentation experiments. We compared the usefulness of Bayesian estimates and the raw looking time difference measures used in previous studies to predict (a) vocabulary size at 30 months and (b) outcome measures obtained from language samples elicited via a picture description task at 36 months. We found that both estimates of morphological segmentation reliably predicted expressive vocabulary at 30 months. The Bayesian estimate also credibly predicted the correct use of verb tense morphemes obtained from the language sample. We therefore conclude that the Bayesian estimate is better for indexing individual differences in segmentation tasks and more useful for predicting clinically relevant language outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting language outcomes at 3 years using individual differences in morphological segmentation in infancy\",\"authors\":\"Jinyoung Jo ,&nbsp;Megha Sundara ,&nbsp;Canaan Breiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infbeh.2024.102001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In previous research, infants’ performance on speech perception tasks has been shown to predict later language outcomes, typically vocabulary size. We used Bayesian analyses to model trial-level looking time behavior of individual infants on morphological segmentation experiments. We compared the usefulness of Bayesian estimates and the raw looking time difference measures used in previous studies to predict (a) vocabulary size at 30 months and (b) outcome measures obtained from language samples elicited via a picture description task at 36 months. We found that both estimates of morphological segmentation reliably predicted expressive vocabulary at 30 months. The Bayesian estimate also credibly predicted the correct use of verb tense morphemes obtained from the language sample. We therefore conclude that the Bayesian estimate is better for indexing individual differences in segmentation tasks and more useful for predicting clinically relevant language outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638324000808\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638324000808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究表明,婴儿在语音感知任务上的表现可预测其日后的语言成果,尤其是词汇量的大小。我们使用贝叶斯分析法对婴儿个体在形态学分段实验中的试验水平观察时间行为进行建模。我们比较了贝叶斯估计值和以往研究中使用的原始观察时间差测量值对预测以下结果的有用性:(a) 30 个月时的词汇量;(b) 36 个月时通过图片描述任务从语言样本中获得的结果测量值。我们发现,形态分段的两种估计值都能可靠地预测 30 个月时的表达词汇量。贝叶斯估计法还能预测语言样本中动词时态语素的正确使用。因此,我们得出结论:贝叶斯估计值更能反映分段任务中的个体差异,也更有助于预测临床相关的语言结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting language outcomes at 3 years using individual differences in morphological segmentation in infancy
In previous research, infants’ performance on speech perception tasks has been shown to predict later language outcomes, typically vocabulary size. We used Bayesian analyses to model trial-level looking time behavior of individual infants on morphological segmentation experiments. We compared the usefulness of Bayesian estimates and the raw looking time difference measures used in previous studies to predict (a) vocabulary size at 30 months and (b) outcome measures obtained from language samples elicited via a picture description task at 36 months. We found that both estimates of morphological segmentation reliably predicted expressive vocabulary at 30 months. The Bayesian estimate also credibly predicted the correct use of verb tense morphemes obtained from the language sample. We therefore conclude that the Bayesian estimate is better for indexing individual differences in segmentation tasks and more useful for predicting clinically relevant language outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infant Behavior & Development
Infant Behavior & Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信