Two Stage Sinus Lifting Using Nanohydroxyapatite Particles Versus Deproteinized Bovine Bone: Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Sinus floor elevation is one of the predictable techniques for augmentation of vertically deficient posterior maxillary alveolar ridges. Several biomaterials were reported to be successful for sinus augmentation, including xenografts and hydroxyapatite. The aim of this study was to compare the quality and quantity of generated bone using xenografts versus nanohydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation.

Methodology

Twenty-four patients/sinuses were randomly assigned into two groups; in the control group, patients underwent sinus floor elevation and augmentation using deproteinized bovine bone (DBB), whereas in the study group, the sinus was augmented using nanohydroxy-apatite bone (NHA). For each patient, the amount of bone height was assessed preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively. Furthermore, the quality of the newly formed bone was assessed via histological and histomorphometric analyses after 6 months postoperatively.

Results

Both biomaterials showed a good level of consolidation. In the study group, the mean bone height after 6 months was 11.72 ± 1.24 compared to 12.01 ± 1.16 mm in the control group which was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The mean bone area percent of newly formed bone was 29.84% ± 6.7% for NHA group and 34.73 ± 7.9 for DBB group. Moreover, the mean percent of residual grafting material was 32.43% ± 11.53% for NHA group compared to 30.43% ± 8.27% for DBB group. Histologically, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding different parameters (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The two-stage sinus floor augmentation using NHA and DBB revealed no statistically significant difference regarding both the quality and the quantity of the regenerated bone. Studies with larger samples and longer follow up are recommended.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03184857.