Xixi Zeng, Mengke Ma, Cong Tan, Shujuan Ni, Lei Wang, Meng Zhang, Weiqi Sheng, Shaolei Lu, Dan Huang
{"title":"诊断神经内分泌肿瘤的挑战:一个国家参考资料中心的经验。","authors":"Xixi Zeng, Mengke Ma, Cong Tan, Shujuan Ni, Lei Wang, Meng Zhang, Weiqi Sheng, Shaolei Lu, Dan Huang","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03957-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Correctly diagnosing neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) has become increasingly challenging, given that more histomorphologic and immunophenotypic NEN mimics have been identified in recent years. A systemic review was conducted on the 4795 consult cases submitted with initial diagnoses of NEN to a national reference center in China from 2013 to 2021. Among them, 443 cases were misdiagnosed as epithelial NENs after reevaluation with the help of immunohistochemical and/or molecular tests, ranging from 7.1 to 13.2%, with yearly increases. The misdiagnoses varied among age groups and tumor sites. Exocrine carcinoma was the most common (63.2%), followed by mesenchymal tumors. Other common tumors that were misdiagnosed included hepatocellular carcinoma, salivary gland tumor, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Aberrant expression of neuroendocrine markers was frequent (218/408, 53.4%), with diffuse positivity ranging from 8.2 to 51.7% for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and INSM1 stains in all non-NEN cases. Selecting appropriate immunohistochemical stains based on H&E morphology is the key to avoiding diagnostic pitfalls. Medical history and molecular genomic information greatly assist in correctly diagnosing NENs and their mimics.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The challenge of diagnosing neuroendocrine neoplasms: experience from a national reference center.\",\"authors\":\"Xixi Zeng, Mengke Ma, Cong Tan, Shujuan Ni, Lei Wang, Meng Zhang, Weiqi Sheng, Shaolei Lu, Dan Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-024-03957-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Correctly diagnosing neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) has become increasingly challenging, given that more histomorphologic and immunophenotypic NEN mimics have been identified in recent years. A systemic review was conducted on the 4795 consult cases submitted with initial diagnoses of NEN to a national reference center in China from 2013 to 2021. Among them, 443 cases were misdiagnosed as epithelial NENs after reevaluation with the help of immunohistochemical and/or molecular tests, ranging from 7.1 to 13.2%, with yearly increases. The misdiagnoses varied among age groups and tumor sites. Exocrine carcinoma was the most common (63.2%), followed by mesenchymal tumors. Other common tumors that were misdiagnosed included hepatocellular carcinoma, salivary gland tumor, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Aberrant expression of neuroendocrine markers was frequent (218/408, 53.4%), with diffuse positivity ranging from 8.2 to 51.7% for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and INSM1 stains in all non-NEN cases. Selecting appropriate immunohistochemical stains based on H&E morphology is the key to avoiding diagnostic pitfalls. Medical history and molecular genomic information greatly assist in correctly diagnosing NENs and their mimics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03957-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03957-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
鉴于近年来发现了更多组织形态学和免疫表型上的神经内分泌肿瘤(NEN)模拟物,正确诊断神经内分泌肿瘤(NEN)变得越来越具有挑战性。我们对2013年至2021年期间提交给中国国家参考中心的4795例初步诊断为NEN的咨询病例进行了系统回顾。其中,443例经免疫组化和/或分子检测重新评估后被误诊为上皮型NEN,误诊率从7.1%到13.2%不等,且呈逐年上升趋势。误诊情况因年龄组和肿瘤部位而异。最常见的是外分泌癌(63.2%),其次是间质瘤。其他常见的误诊肿瘤包括肝细胞癌、唾液腺肿瘤和胃肠道间质瘤。神经内分泌标记物的异常表达很常见(218/408,53.4%),在所有非 NEN 病例中,突触素、嗜铬粒蛋白 A 和 INSM1 染色的弥漫阳性率从 8.2% 到 51.7% 不等。根据 H&E 形态学选择适当的免疫组化染色是避免诊断误区的关键。病史和分子基因组信息对正确诊断 NEN 及其类似物大有帮助。
The challenge of diagnosing neuroendocrine neoplasms: experience from a national reference center.
Correctly diagnosing neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) has become increasingly challenging, given that more histomorphologic and immunophenotypic NEN mimics have been identified in recent years. A systemic review was conducted on the 4795 consult cases submitted with initial diagnoses of NEN to a national reference center in China from 2013 to 2021. Among them, 443 cases were misdiagnosed as epithelial NENs after reevaluation with the help of immunohistochemical and/or molecular tests, ranging from 7.1 to 13.2%, with yearly increases. The misdiagnoses varied among age groups and tumor sites. Exocrine carcinoma was the most common (63.2%), followed by mesenchymal tumors. Other common tumors that were misdiagnosed included hepatocellular carcinoma, salivary gland tumor, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Aberrant expression of neuroendocrine markers was frequent (218/408, 53.4%), with diffuse positivity ranging from 8.2 to 51.7% for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and INSM1 stains in all non-NEN cases. Selecting appropriate immunohistochemical stains based on H&E morphology is the key to avoiding diagnostic pitfalls. Medical history and molecular genomic information greatly assist in correctly diagnosing NENs and their mimics.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.