视频辅助胸腔镜手术患者术后疼痛的深浅锯肌前联合阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞的比较。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5881
Gülay Ülger, Musa Zengin, Onur Küçük, Ramazan Baldemir, Oya Kaybal, Mehtap Tunç, Hilal Sazak, Ali Alagöz
{"title":"视频辅助胸腔镜手术患者术后疼痛的深浅锯肌前联合阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞的比较。","authors":"Gülay Ülger, Musa Zengin, Onur Küçük, Ramazan Baldemir, Oya Kaybal, Mehtap Tunç, Hilal Sazak, Ali Alagöz","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.5881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is a well-established procedure for the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). In recent years, there have been studies suggesting that fascial plane blocks may be an alternative to TPVB. The objective of our study was to determine the efficacy of combined deep and superficial serratus anterior block (C-SAPB) as an alternative to TPVB in the management of postoperative analgesia in VATS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The patients were divided into two groups: the TPVB group and the C-SAPB group. Both groups were administered the same dose of local anesthetics. Multimodal analgesia was achieved for the groups. The primary outcome measure was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores recorded within the first 48 h of the postoperative period in each group. The secondary outcomes were analgesic requirement, rescue analgesics, complications rate, and postoperative patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients with C-SAPB and 30 patients with TPVB were analysed. VAS rest and VAS coughing scores were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Demographic and side effect conditions, total morphine use, additional analgesic needs, vital parameters, block procedure time, and patient satisfaction were also similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, although block application times were comparable, the time was slightly shorter in C-SAPB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Similar analgesic efficacy was observed between C-SAPB and TPVB. TPVB maintains its place among the first choices in VATS. The efficacy of C-SAPB is comparable to that of TPVB. While the duration of C-SAPB application is not a significant factor, the brief nature of the procedure and its straightforward administration suggest that it may be an effective method.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of combined deep and superficial serratus anterior block with thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Gülay Ülger, Musa Zengin, Onur Küçük, Ramazan Baldemir, Oya Kaybal, Mehtap Tunç, Hilal Sazak, Ali Alagöz\",\"doi\":\"10.55730/1300-0144.5881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is a well-established procedure for the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). In recent years, there have been studies suggesting that fascial plane blocks may be an alternative to TPVB. The objective of our study was to determine the efficacy of combined deep and superficial serratus anterior block (C-SAPB) as an alternative to TPVB in the management of postoperative analgesia in VATS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The patients were divided into two groups: the TPVB group and the C-SAPB group. Both groups were administered the same dose of local anesthetics. Multimodal analgesia was achieved for the groups. The primary outcome measure was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores recorded within the first 48 h of the postoperative period in each group. The secondary outcomes were analgesic requirement, rescue analgesics, complications rate, and postoperative patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients with C-SAPB and 30 patients with TPVB were analysed. VAS rest and VAS coughing scores were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Demographic and side effect conditions, total morphine use, additional analgesic needs, vital parameters, block procedure time, and patient satisfaction were also similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, although block application times were comparable, the time was slightly shorter in C-SAPB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Similar analgesic efficacy was observed between C-SAPB and TPVB. TPVB maintains its place among the first choices in VATS. The efficacy of C-SAPB is comparable to that of TPVB. While the duration of C-SAPB application is not a significant factor, the brief nature of the procedure and its straightforward administration suggest that it may be an effective method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518326/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5881\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5881","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)是治疗接受视频辅助胸腔手术(VATS)患者术后疼痛的一种行之有效的方法。近年来,有研究表明筋膜面阻滞可替代 TPVB。我们的研究目的是确定深浅锯肌前联合阻滞(C-SAPB)在 VATS 术后镇痛中替代 TPVB 的疗效:将患者分为两组:TPVB 组和 C-SAPB 组。两组患者均使用相同剂量的局麻药。两组均实现了多模式镇痛。主要结果是各组术后 48 小时内的视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分。次要结果为镇痛剂需求量、解救镇痛剂、并发症发生率和术后患者满意度:对 30 名 C-SAPB 患者和 30 名 TPVB 患者进行了分析。两组患者的 VAS 休息评分和 VAS 咳嗽评分相似(P > 0.05)。两组患者的人口统计学和副作用情况、吗啡总用量、额外镇痛需求、生命参数、阻滞过程时间和患者满意度也相似(P > 0.05)。此外,虽然阻滞应用时间相当,但 C-SAPB 的时间略短:结论:C-SAPB 和 TPVB 的镇痛效果相似。结论:C-SAPB 和 TPVB 的镇痛效果相似,TPVB 仍是 VATS 的首选。C-SAPB 的疗效与 TPVB 相当。虽然使用 C-SAPB 的时间长短并不是一个重要因素,但手术时间短、用药直接表明它可能是一种有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of combined deep and superficial serratus anterior block with thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Background/aim: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is a well-established procedure for the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). In recent years, there have been studies suggesting that fascial plane blocks may be an alternative to TPVB. The objective of our study was to determine the efficacy of combined deep and superficial serratus anterior block (C-SAPB) as an alternative to TPVB in the management of postoperative analgesia in VATS.

Materials and methods: The patients were divided into two groups: the TPVB group and the C-SAPB group. Both groups were administered the same dose of local anesthetics. Multimodal analgesia was achieved for the groups. The primary outcome measure was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores recorded within the first 48 h of the postoperative period in each group. The secondary outcomes were analgesic requirement, rescue analgesics, complications rate, and postoperative patient satisfaction.

Results: Thirty patients with C-SAPB and 30 patients with TPVB were analysed. VAS rest and VAS coughing scores were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Demographic and side effect conditions, total morphine use, additional analgesic needs, vital parameters, block procedure time, and patient satisfaction were also similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, although block application times were comparable, the time was slightly shorter in C-SAPB.

Conclusion: Similar analgesic efficacy was observed between C-SAPB and TPVB. TPVB maintains its place among the first choices in VATS. The efficacy of C-SAPB is comparable to that of TPVB. While the duration of C-SAPB application is not a significant factor, the brief nature of the procedure and its straightforward administration suggest that it may be an effective method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信