干扰素-β治疗多发性硬化症患者治疗前白细胞较低可能是诱发白细胞减少症的风险因素。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864241286497
Maria Protopapa, Samantha Schmaul, Muriel Schraad, Katrin Pape, Frauke Zipp, Stefan Bittner, Timo Uphaus
{"title":"干扰素-β治疗多发性硬化症患者治疗前白细胞较低可能是诱发白细胞减少症的风险因素。","authors":"Maria Protopapa, Samantha Schmaul, Muriel Schraad, Katrin Pape, Frauke Zipp, Stefan Bittner, Timo Uphaus","doi":"10.1177/17562864241286497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interferon-beta (IFN-β) still plays a fundamental role in immunomodulation of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) with low disease activity and in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). In 2014, pegylated (PEG) interferon was licensed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), enabling a lower dosing frequency.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our retrospective study compares laboratory findings and adverse events between subcutaneous (sc.) PEG-IFN-β-1a and IFN-β-1a in RRMS and CIS patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Patients with CIS or RRMS fulfilling the revised McDonald criteria from 2017 visiting the neurology department of the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz from 2010 to 2019 and treated with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a or sc. IFN-β-1a (<i>n</i> = 202) were screened for eligibility. Patients who underwent regular laboratory controls in-house were included in our analysis (<i>n</i> = 128).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluate disease progression through clinical examination, relapse history, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) disease activity (gadolinium-enhancing or new T2 lesions). Relevant laboratory findings such as leukopenia (leukocyte count < 3.5/nl) and neutropenia (neutrophil count <43% of lymphocytes or <1500/µl) were assessed. Telephone interviews evaluated the side effects of the respective medication. A subgroup of patients was analyzed regarding neutrophil quantities and qualities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a had significantly lower leukocyte counts (<i>p</i> = 0.046) and higher incidences of leukopenia (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and neutropenia (<i>p</i> = 0.03) compared to sc. IFN-β-1a. Clinical and MRI disease activity showed no significant differences, but people treated with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a reported more common adverse events such as joint/muscle pain, injection-site reaction, and infections. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a compared to unpegylated sc. IFN-β resulted in a significantly greater reduction in leukocyte and neutrophil levels with a higher incidence of side effects. We suggest mandatory monitoring of differential blood counts before and during treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562864241286497"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower leukocytes pretreatment as a possible risk factor for therapy-induced leukopenia in interferon-beta-treated patients with multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Protopapa, Samantha Schmaul, Muriel Schraad, Katrin Pape, Frauke Zipp, Stefan Bittner, Timo Uphaus\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562864241286497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interferon-beta (IFN-β) still plays a fundamental role in immunomodulation of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) with low disease activity and in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). In 2014, pegylated (PEG) interferon was licensed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), enabling a lower dosing frequency.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our retrospective study compares laboratory findings and adverse events between subcutaneous (sc.) PEG-IFN-β-1a and IFN-β-1a in RRMS and CIS patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Patients with CIS or RRMS fulfilling the revised McDonald criteria from 2017 visiting the neurology department of the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz from 2010 to 2019 and treated with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a or sc. IFN-β-1a (<i>n</i> = 202) were screened for eligibility. Patients who underwent regular laboratory controls in-house were included in our analysis (<i>n</i> = 128).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluate disease progression through clinical examination, relapse history, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) disease activity (gadolinium-enhancing or new T2 lesions). Relevant laboratory findings such as leukopenia (leukocyte count < 3.5/nl) and neutropenia (neutrophil count <43% of lymphocytes or <1500/µl) were assessed. Telephone interviews evaluated the side effects of the respective medication. A subgroup of patients was analyzed regarding neutrophil quantities and qualities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a had significantly lower leukocyte counts (<i>p</i> = 0.046) and higher incidences of leukopenia (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and neutropenia (<i>p</i> = 0.03) compared to sc. IFN-β-1a. Clinical and MRI disease activity showed no significant differences, but people treated with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a reported more common adverse events such as joint/muscle pain, injection-site reaction, and infections. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a compared to unpegylated sc. IFN-β resulted in a significantly greater reduction in leukocyte and neutrophil levels with a higher incidence of side effects. We suggest mandatory monitoring of differential blood counts before and during treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"17562864241286497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523160/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241286497\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241286497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:干扰素-β(IFN-β)在疾病活动性低的多发性硬化症(MS)患者和临床孤立综合征(CIS)患者的免疫调节中仍发挥着重要作用。2014年,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)许可将聚乙二醇干扰素(PEG)用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS),从而降低了给药频率:我们的回顾性研究比较了皮下注射 PEG-IFN-β-1a 和 IFN-β-1a 治疗 RRMS 和 CIS 患者的实验室结果和不良反应:设计:符合 2017 年修订的麦克唐纳标准的 CIS 或 RRMS 患者,2010 年至 2019 年就诊于美因茨约翰内斯古腾堡大学大学医学中心神经内科,并接受 sc.PEG-IFN-β-1a 和 IFN-β-1a 治疗。PEG-IFN-β-1a 或 sc.IFN-β-1a治疗的患者(n = 202)进行了资格筛选。我们的分析还包括定期接受内部实验室检查的患者(n = 128):我们通过临床检查、复发史和磁共振成像(MRI)疾病活动度(钆增强或新的 T2 病灶)来评估疾病进展情况。相关的实验室检查结果,如白细胞减少(白细胞计数结果)、白细胞计数异常(白细胞计数异常)和白细胞计数异常(白细胞计数异常):接受 sc.PEG-IFN-β-1 治疗的患者PEG-IFN-β-1a治疗的患者白细胞计数明显降低(p = 0.046),白细胞减少症(p = 0.006)和中性粒细胞减少症(p = 0.03)的发生率高于sc.IFN-β-1a。临床和 MRI 疾病活动性无显著差异,但接受 sc.但接受 sc.PEG-IFN-β-1a 治疗的患者报告的常见不良事件较多,如关节/肌肉疼痛、注射部位反应和感染。没有严重不良事件的报告:结论:使用 sc.结论:PEG-IFN-β-1a sc.治疗与非pegylated sc.结论:PEG-IFN-β-1a sc.与未培基化的 sc.IFN-β-1a相比,能显著降低白细胞和中性粒细胞水平,但副作用发生率更高。我们建议在治疗前和治疗期间必须监测血细胞计数差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lower leukocytes pretreatment as a possible risk factor for therapy-induced leukopenia in interferon-beta-treated patients with multiple sclerosis.

Background: Interferon-beta (IFN-β) still plays a fundamental role in immunomodulation of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) with low disease activity and in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). In 2014, pegylated (PEG) interferon was licensed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), enabling a lower dosing frequency.

Objectives: Our retrospective study compares laboratory findings and adverse events between subcutaneous (sc.) PEG-IFN-β-1a and IFN-β-1a in RRMS and CIS patients.

Design: Patients with CIS or RRMS fulfilling the revised McDonald criteria from 2017 visiting the neurology department of the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz from 2010 to 2019 and treated with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a or sc. IFN-β-1a (n = 202) were screened for eligibility. Patients who underwent regular laboratory controls in-house were included in our analysis (n = 128).

Methods: We evaluate disease progression through clinical examination, relapse history, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) disease activity (gadolinium-enhancing or new T2 lesions). Relevant laboratory findings such as leukopenia (leukocyte count < 3.5/nl) and neutropenia (neutrophil count <43% of lymphocytes or <1500/µl) were assessed. Telephone interviews evaluated the side effects of the respective medication. A subgroup of patients was analyzed regarding neutrophil quantities and qualities.

Results: Patients treated with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a had significantly lower leukocyte counts (p = 0.046) and higher incidences of leukopenia (p = 0.006) and neutropenia (p = 0.03) compared to sc. IFN-β-1a. Clinical and MRI disease activity showed no significant differences, but people treated with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a reported more common adverse events such as joint/muscle pain, injection-site reaction, and infections. No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Treatment with sc. PEG-IFN-β-1a compared to unpegylated sc. IFN-β resulted in a significantly greater reduction in leukocyte and neutrophil levels with a higher incidence of side effects. We suggest mandatory monitoring of differential blood counts before and during treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信