评估针对患有创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人的移动 "曼特拉姆重复计划":自我指导与文本支持交付的多方法随机可行性试验。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Caitlin L McLean, Ashley Faytol, Gage M Chu, Andrea Henneken, Borsika A Rabin, James O E Pittman, Laurie Lindamer, Ariel J Lang
{"title":"评估针对患有创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人的移动 \"曼特拉姆重复计划\":自我指导与文本支持交付的多方法随机可行性试验。","authors":"Caitlin L McLean, Ashley Faytol, Gage M Chu, Andrea Henneken, Borsika A Rabin, James O E Pittman, Laurie Lindamer, Ariel J Lang","doi":"10.1037/tra0001811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While mobile delivery can help increase access to evidence-based treatment for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), feasibility and acceptability are of concern with the potential for high attrition rates and limited participation. The Mantram Repetition Program (MRP), a meditation-focused approach with documented efficacy for reducing symptoms of PTSD and insomnia, was adapted as a brief, mobile-delivered MRP (mMRP) training. This study assessed implementation indicators of mMRP and compared self-directed users of mMRP versus users who received additional text message support.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty-six veterans with clinically significant PTSD symptoms (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 50.50 years; 83.3% male; 72.2% White; 88.9% heterosexual) completed four weekly training video modules. Participants completed questions related to program satisfaction, mantram repetition use, clinical measures, and a 30-min individual interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported using their mantram between 4 and 5 days per week. Participants indicated that mMRP was generally acceptable, appropriate, and feasible across quantitative and qualitative data. On clinical measures, change from pre- to postintervention was significant for the brief symptom screen, PTSD symptoms, and Personal Health Inventory but not for depression or insomnia symptoms. No significant differences were found between the self-directed and supported conditions; however, data suggest that participants primarily engaged with the support for administrative needs. Qualitative data highlighted suggestions for mMRP improvement, including alternative methods for receiving support and more content on how to use the skills taught.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that mMRP can be delivered in a brief format, with veterans learning and using mantram repetition. Developing additional ways of individualizing the mMRP and further testing are warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the mobile Mantram Repetition Program for veterans with PTSD: A multimethod randomized feasibility trial of self-directed versus text support delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin L McLean, Ashley Faytol, Gage M Chu, Andrea Henneken, Borsika A Rabin, James O E Pittman, Laurie Lindamer, Ariel J Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While mobile delivery can help increase access to evidence-based treatment for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), feasibility and acceptability are of concern with the potential for high attrition rates and limited participation. The Mantram Repetition Program (MRP), a meditation-focused approach with documented efficacy for reducing symptoms of PTSD and insomnia, was adapted as a brief, mobile-delivered MRP (mMRP) training. This study assessed implementation indicators of mMRP and compared self-directed users of mMRP versus users who received additional text message support.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty-six veterans with clinically significant PTSD symptoms (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 50.50 years; 83.3% male; 72.2% White; 88.9% heterosexual) completed four weekly training video modules. Participants completed questions related to program satisfaction, mantram repetition use, clinical measures, and a 30-min individual interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported using their mantram between 4 and 5 days per week. Participants indicated that mMRP was generally acceptable, appropriate, and feasible across quantitative and qualitative data. On clinical measures, change from pre- to postintervention was significant for the brief symptom screen, PTSD symptoms, and Personal Health Inventory but not for depression or insomnia symptoms. No significant differences were found between the self-directed and supported conditions; however, data suggest that participants primarily engaged with the support for administrative needs. Qualitative data highlighted suggestions for mMRP improvement, including alternative methods for receiving support and more content on how to use the skills taught.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that mMRP can be delivered in a brief format, with veterans learning and using mantram repetition. Developing additional ways of individualizing the mMRP and further testing are warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001811\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001811","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然移动医疗有助于增加患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的退伍军人获得循证治疗的机会,但其可行性和可接受性却令人担忧,因为可能会出现高流失率和有限的参与度。曼特拉姆重复计划(Mantram Repetition Program,简称 MRP)是一种以冥想为重点的方法,对减轻创伤后应激障碍和失眠症状有显著疗效。本研究评估了 mMRP 的实施指标,并对 mMRP 的自主使用者与接受额外短信支持的使用者进行了比较:36 名有临床严重创伤后应激障碍症状的退伍军人(年龄 = 50.50 岁;83.3% 为男性;72.2% 为白人;88.9% 为异性恋者)完成了每周四次的培训视频模块。参与者完成了与项目满意度、咒语重复使用、临床测量和 30 分钟个人访谈相关的问题:结果:参与者表示每周使用曼陀罗 4 到 5 天。从定量和定性数据来看,参与者普遍认为 mMRP 是可接受的、适当的和可行的。在临床测量方面,干预前与干预后的简短症状筛查、创伤后应激障碍症状和个人健康量表有显著变化,但抑郁或失眠症状无显著变化。在自我指导和支持条件之间没有发现明显的差异;但是,数据表明,参与者主要是出于管理需要而参与支持。定性数据强调了对移动心理康复计划的改进建议,包括接受支持的其他方法和更多关于如何使用所教技能的内容:研究结果表明,可以通过简短的形式,让退伍军人学习和使用曼陀罗重复法来实施 mMRP。有必要开发更多个性化 mMRP 的方法并进行进一步测试。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the mobile Mantram Repetition Program for veterans with PTSD: A multimethod randomized feasibility trial of self-directed versus text support delivery.

Objective: While mobile delivery can help increase access to evidence-based treatment for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), feasibility and acceptability are of concern with the potential for high attrition rates and limited participation. The Mantram Repetition Program (MRP), a meditation-focused approach with documented efficacy for reducing symptoms of PTSD and insomnia, was adapted as a brief, mobile-delivered MRP (mMRP) training. This study assessed implementation indicators of mMRP and compared self-directed users of mMRP versus users who received additional text message support.

Method: Thirty-six veterans with clinically significant PTSD symptoms (Mage = 50.50 years; 83.3% male; 72.2% White; 88.9% heterosexual) completed four weekly training video modules. Participants completed questions related to program satisfaction, mantram repetition use, clinical measures, and a 30-min individual interview.

Results: Participants reported using their mantram between 4 and 5 days per week. Participants indicated that mMRP was generally acceptable, appropriate, and feasible across quantitative and qualitative data. On clinical measures, change from pre- to postintervention was significant for the brief symptom screen, PTSD symptoms, and Personal Health Inventory but not for depression or insomnia symptoms. No significant differences were found between the self-directed and supported conditions; however, data suggest that participants primarily engaged with the support for administrative needs. Qualitative data highlighted suggestions for mMRP improvement, including alternative methods for receiving support and more content on how to use the skills taught.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that mMRP can be delivered in a brief format, with veterans learning and using mantram repetition. Developing additional ways of individualizing the mMRP and further testing are warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信