Juanxia Li , Xiaoming Bai , Fu Ran , Yuchi Zhi , Dongdong Gao , Yao Fang , Jialong Cheng , Xueting Chai , Ping Li , Hui Chen
{"title":"一年生蓝草(Poa annua)对寒冷、干旱和综合胁迫的反应机制以及形态、光合作用、生理和微观结构的恢复。","authors":"Juanxia Li , Xiaoming Bai , Fu Ran , Yuchi Zhi , Dongdong Gao , Yao Fang , Jialong Cheng , Xueting Chai , Ping Li , Hui Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.109238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drought and cold stresses co-occur in nature, and significantly limited agricultural productivity in northwest China. Their effects on plant photosynthesis, physiology and biochemistry, and microstructure have been extensively studied, but their combined stress mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, growth chamber experiments were conducted using the Annual bluegrass (<em>Poa annua</em>) with the ‘HZ’ and ‘ZQ’ germplasms, our goal was to clarify the responses of leaves to cold (C), drought (D), and combined (D&C) stresses in the morphology, photosynthesis, physiology and biochemistry, and microstructure. The results showed that three stress types significantly suppressed growth, reduced photosynthetic pigments, photosynthetic capacity, and photosynthetic enzyme activities, with ‘ZQ’ being more sensitive than ‘HZ’. C stress (12/36 h) improved chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in ‘HZ’ (except for photochemical quenching coefficient), while D and D&C stresses diminished these parameters of both germplasms. Under single and combined stresses, leaf thickness and cuticle thickness generally increased then decreased with stress duration, except for ‘ZQ’ under D stress. D stress increased reactive oxygen species, relative conductivity, malondialdehyde content and stomatal density, while inhibited stomatal size. Conversely, C stress exacerbated the negative effects of drought on these traits. The D&C stress enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity and proline content, which were similar to the responses to D stress, except for ‘ZQ’ under D&C stress. After 24 h of stress relief, the recoveries degree of most traits in plant under D and D&C stresses were similar, with ‘HZ’ recovering more than ‘ZQ’. This study indicated drought played a dominant role in combined stress. However, some unique responses could not be inferred from the superimposed effects of some single stresses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20234,"journal":{"name":"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response mechanisms of Annual bluegrass (Poa annua) to cold, drought, combined stresses and recovery in morphology, photosynthesis, physiology and microstructure\",\"authors\":\"Juanxia Li , Xiaoming Bai , Fu Ran , Yuchi Zhi , Dongdong Gao , Yao Fang , Jialong Cheng , Xueting Chai , Ping Li , Hui Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.109238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Drought and cold stresses co-occur in nature, and significantly limited agricultural productivity in northwest China. Their effects on plant photosynthesis, physiology and biochemistry, and microstructure have been extensively studied, but their combined stress mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, growth chamber experiments were conducted using the Annual bluegrass (<em>Poa annua</em>) with the ‘HZ’ and ‘ZQ’ germplasms, our goal was to clarify the responses of leaves to cold (C), drought (D), and combined (D&C) stresses in the morphology, photosynthesis, physiology and biochemistry, and microstructure. The results showed that three stress types significantly suppressed growth, reduced photosynthetic pigments, photosynthetic capacity, and photosynthetic enzyme activities, with ‘ZQ’ being more sensitive than ‘HZ’. C stress (12/36 h) improved chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in ‘HZ’ (except for photochemical quenching coefficient), while D and D&C stresses diminished these parameters of both germplasms. Under single and combined stresses, leaf thickness and cuticle thickness generally increased then decreased with stress duration, except for ‘ZQ’ under D stress. D stress increased reactive oxygen species, relative conductivity, malondialdehyde content and stomatal density, while inhibited stomatal size. Conversely, C stress exacerbated the negative effects of drought on these traits. The D&C stress enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity and proline content, which were similar to the responses to D stress, except for ‘ZQ’ under D&C stress. After 24 h of stress relief, the recoveries degree of most traits in plant under D and D&C stresses were similar, with ‘HZ’ recovering more than ‘ZQ’. This study indicated drought played a dominant role in combined stress. However, some unique responses could not be inferred from the superimposed effects of some single stresses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0981942824009069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0981942824009069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Response mechanisms of Annual bluegrass (Poa annua) to cold, drought, combined stresses and recovery in morphology, photosynthesis, physiology and microstructure
Drought and cold stresses co-occur in nature, and significantly limited agricultural productivity in northwest China. Their effects on plant photosynthesis, physiology and biochemistry, and microstructure have been extensively studied, but their combined stress mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, growth chamber experiments were conducted using the Annual bluegrass (Poa annua) with the ‘HZ’ and ‘ZQ’ germplasms, our goal was to clarify the responses of leaves to cold (C), drought (D), and combined (D&C) stresses in the morphology, photosynthesis, physiology and biochemistry, and microstructure. The results showed that three stress types significantly suppressed growth, reduced photosynthetic pigments, photosynthetic capacity, and photosynthetic enzyme activities, with ‘ZQ’ being more sensitive than ‘HZ’. C stress (12/36 h) improved chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in ‘HZ’ (except for photochemical quenching coefficient), while D and D&C stresses diminished these parameters of both germplasms. Under single and combined stresses, leaf thickness and cuticle thickness generally increased then decreased with stress duration, except for ‘ZQ’ under D stress. D stress increased reactive oxygen species, relative conductivity, malondialdehyde content and stomatal density, while inhibited stomatal size. Conversely, C stress exacerbated the negative effects of drought on these traits. The D&C stress enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity and proline content, which were similar to the responses to D stress, except for ‘ZQ’ under D&C stress. After 24 h of stress relief, the recoveries degree of most traits in plant under D and D&C stresses were similar, with ‘HZ’ recovering more than ‘ZQ’. This study indicated drought played a dominant role in combined stress. However, some unique responses could not be inferred from the superimposed effects of some single stresses.
期刊介绍:
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry publishes original theoretical, experimental and technical contributions in the various fields of plant physiology (biochemistry, physiology, structure, genetics, plant-microbe interactions, etc.) at diverse levels of integration (molecular, subcellular, cellular, organ, whole plant, environmental). Opinions expressed in the journal are the sole responsibility of the authors and publication does not imply the editors'' agreement.
Manuscripts describing molecular-genetic and/or gene expression data that are not integrated with biochemical analysis and/or actual measurements of plant physiological processes are not suitable for PPB. Also "Omics" studies (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc.) reporting descriptive analysis without an element of functional validation assays, will not be considered. Similarly, applied agronomic or phytochemical studies that generate no new, fundamental insights in plant physiological and/or biochemical processes are not suitable for publication in PPB.
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry publishes several types of articles: Reviews, Papers and Short Papers. Articles for Reviews are either invited by the editor or proposed by the authors for the editor''s prior agreement. Reviews should not exceed 40 typewritten pages and Short Papers no more than approximately 8 typewritten pages. The fundamental character of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry remains that of a journal for original results.