评估神经外科培训:毕业医学教育认证委员会病例最低要求与手术自主权。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vishal Venkatraman, Margot Kelly-Hedrick, Alexander D Suarez, Rajeev Dharmapurikar, Shivanand P Lad, Michael M Haglund
{"title":"评估神经外科培训:毕业医学教育认证委员会病例最低要求与手术自主权。","authors":"Vishal Venkatraman, Margot Kelly-Hedrick, Alexander D Suarez, Rajeev Dharmapurikar, Shivanand P Lad, Michael M Haglund","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires neurosurgery residents to reach a set number of cases in specified procedure types (case minimums) before graduation and mandates completion of Milestones. We used the Surgical Autonomy Program, a validated method of autonomy-based resident evaluation, to determine the number of cases it took for residents to become competent and compared these with the ACGME case minimums.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data from neurosurgery residents at Duke University on 7 procedures (tumor craniotomy, trauma craniotomy, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical fusion (PCF), discectomy/laminectomy, and posterior thoracolumbar spinal fusion [PSF]). We defined competency as being graded at the highest autonomy level in the Surgical Autonomy Program by attending neurosurgeons for the first and second time and determined the case volume on the ACGME case log when these were achieved. These results were analyzed with summary statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median case volume among residents (N = 4-8) for the first and second competency rating (and ACGME minimum) for each procedure type was found to be: tumor: 44.5 and 64.5 (min. 60), trauma: 21 and 30 (min. 60), ventriculoperitoneal shunt: 11.3 and 13 (min. 20), ACDF: 30 and 32.5 (min. 20), PCF: 24 and 40 (min. 30), discectomy/laminectomy: 28 and 36 (min. 30), and PSF: 51 and 54 (min. 30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found variation in the case numbers to reach competency and that for some procedures (tumor, ACDF, PCF, discectomy/laminectomy, and PSF), most residents required more cases than the ACGME case minimums to achieve competency. The ACGME case minimums may not accurately reflect the number of cases required for neurosurgical residents to reach competency. To promote trainee-centered education, individualized, competency-based evaluation systems may be better determining readiness for graduation, including a system that builds off the established ACGME Milestones.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Neurosurgery Training: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Case Minimums Versus Surgical Autonomy.\",\"authors\":\"Vishal Venkatraman, Margot Kelly-Hedrick, Alexander D Suarez, Rajeev Dharmapurikar, Shivanand P Lad, Michael M Haglund\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neu.0000000000003241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires neurosurgery residents to reach a set number of cases in specified procedure types (case minimums) before graduation and mandates completion of Milestones. We used the Surgical Autonomy Program, a validated method of autonomy-based resident evaluation, to determine the number of cases it took for residents to become competent and compared these with the ACGME case minimums.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data from neurosurgery residents at Duke University on 7 procedures (tumor craniotomy, trauma craniotomy, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical fusion (PCF), discectomy/laminectomy, and posterior thoracolumbar spinal fusion [PSF]). We defined competency as being graded at the highest autonomy level in the Surgical Autonomy Program by attending neurosurgeons for the first and second time and determined the case volume on the ACGME case log when these were achieved. These results were analyzed with summary statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median case volume among residents (N = 4-8) for the first and second competency rating (and ACGME minimum) for each procedure type was found to be: tumor: 44.5 and 64.5 (min. 60), trauma: 21 and 30 (min. 60), ventriculoperitoneal shunt: 11.3 and 13 (min. 20), ACDF: 30 and 32.5 (min. 20), PCF: 24 and 40 (min. 30), discectomy/laminectomy: 28 and 36 (min. 30), and PSF: 51 and 54 (min. 30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found variation in the case numbers to reach competency and that for some procedures (tumor, ACDF, PCF, discectomy/laminectomy, and PSF), most residents required more cases than the ACGME case minimums to achieve competency. The ACGME case minimums may not accurately reflect the number of cases required for neurosurgical residents to reach competency. To promote trainee-centered education, individualized, competency-based evaluation systems may be better determining readiness for graduation, including a system that builds off the established ACGME Milestones.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003241\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:美国毕业医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)要求神经外科住院医师在毕业前达到规定手术类型的病例数(最低病例数),并规定住院医师必须完成 "里程碑"。我们使用外科自主计划(一种基于自主性的住院医师评估的有效方法)来确定住院医师达到合格标准所需的病例数,并将其与 ACGME 的最低病例数进行比较:我们收集了杜克大学神经外科住院医师关于 7 种手术(肿瘤开颅术、创伤开颅术、脑室腹腔分流术、颈椎前路椎间盘切除及融合术 (ACDF)、颈椎后路融合术 (PCF)、椎间盘切除术/椎板切除术和胸腰椎后路融合术 [PSF])的数据。我们将神经外科主治医师第一次和第二次在手术自主计划中被评为最高自主级别定义为胜任能力,并确定了ACGME病例日志中达到这些级别时的病例量。我们对这些结果进行了汇总统计分析:结果:住院医师(N = 4-8)第一次和第二次能力评级(ACGME 最低标准)每种手术类型的病例量中位数分别为:肿瘤:44.5 和 64.5(最少 60 例);创伤:21 和 30(最少 60 例);脑室腹腔分流术:11.3 和 13(最少 60 例):11.3和13(分钟,20),ACDF:30和32.5(分钟,20),PCF:24和40(分钟,30),椎间盘切除术/椎板切除术:28和36(分钟,30),PSF:51和54(分钟,30):我们发现,达到能力要求的病例数存在差异,对于某些手术(肿瘤、ACDF、PCF、椎间盘切除术/椎板切除术和PSF),大多数住院医师需要比ACGME最低病例数更多的病例才能达到能力要求。ACGME 的最低病例数可能无法准确反映神经外科住院医师达到能力要求所需的病例数。为了促进以受训者为中心的教育,个性化的、以能力为基础的评估系统,包括建立在 ACGME 里程碑基础上的系统,可能会更好地确定毕业准备情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Neurosurgery Training: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Case Minimums Versus Surgical Autonomy.

Background and objectives: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires neurosurgery residents to reach a set number of cases in specified procedure types (case minimums) before graduation and mandates completion of Milestones. We used the Surgical Autonomy Program, a validated method of autonomy-based resident evaluation, to determine the number of cases it took for residents to become competent and compared these with the ACGME case minimums.

Methods: We collected data from neurosurgery residents at Duke University on 7 procedures (tumor craniotomy, trauma craniotomy, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical fusion (PCF), discectomy/laminectomy, and posterior thoracolumbar spinal fusion [PSF]). We defined competency as being graded at the highest autonomy level in the Surgical Autonomy Program by attending neurosurgeons for the first and second time and determined the case volume on the ACGME case log when these were achieved. These results were analyzed with summary statistics.

Results: The median case volume among residents (N = 4-8) for the first and second competency rating (and ACGME minimum) for each procedure type was found to be: tumor: 44.5 and 64.5 (min. 60), trauma: 21 and 30 (min. 60), ventriculoperitoneal shunt: 11.3 and 13 (min. 20), ACDF: 30 and 32.5 (min. 20), PCF: 24 and 40 (min. 30), discectomy/laminectomy: 28 and 36 (min. 30), and PSF: 51 and 54 (min. 30).

Conclusion: We found variation in the case numbers to reach competency and that for some procedures (tumor, ACDF, PCF, discectomy/laminectomy, and PSF), most residents required more cases than the ACGME case minimums to achieve competency. The ACGME case minimums may not accurately reflect the number of cases required for neurosurgical residents to reach competency. To promote trainee-centered education, individualized, competency-based evaluation systems may be better determining readiness for graduation, including a system that builds off the established ACGME Milestones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信