坐立桌干预措施是否会产生补偿行为?

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Hélio Silva, Sabrina C Teno, Pedro B Júdice
{"title":"坐立桌干预措施是否会产生补偿行为?","authors":"Hélio Silva, Sabrina C Teno, Pedro B Júdice","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiae067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Office workers represent one of the most sedentary groups. Alarmingly, more than a third of their sitting time during workdays occurs in prolonged bouts. Sit-stand desk (SSD) interventions have been found to be effective in reducing sitting time, but heterogeneity exists amongst studies, which may be due to compensations outside the workplace. This study aimed to assess the impact of a 6-month SSD intervention on office workers' sitting and standing times during the work shift and outside work (leisure time).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-arm (1:1) clustered randomized controlled trial was conducted with 38 participants randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. The intervention included a psychoeducational session, motivational prompts, and environmental modification (SSD implemented in the workplace). The waiting-list control group maintained the usual work conditions and only received the initial session. We employed repeated measures ANCOVA to compare changes between groups while adjusting for relevant covariates, with significance set at 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the intervention group, there was a significant reduction in sitting time at work by 32.97 min, along with a notable increase in standing time by 27.88 min (p<0.05). Although not significant (p>0.05), there was an increase in sitting time in the leisure context of about 23.07 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the effectiveness of SSD as a key strategy to mitigate sitting time among office workers. However, future interventions should consider integrating comprehensive behavioral strategies beyond the workplace to sustain potential increases in sitting time during the leisure time and avoid compensatory behaviors. What is already known on this topic: Sedentary behavior, particularly in the workplace, is associated with increased risks of non-communicable diseases and premature mortality. Previous studies have shown that sit-stand desk (SSD) interventions can significantly reduce sitting time at work. However, uncertainties remain about whether these effects persist outside of the workplace and if compensatory behaviors occur during leisure time.</p><p><strong>What this study adds: </strong>This study demonstrated that a 6-month SSD intervention resulted in a significant reduction of 32.97 minutes in sitting time during work hours and a corresponding increase in standing time. However, a non-significant increase of 23.07 minutes in sitting time during leisure was observed, suggesting potential compensatory behaviors outside of work. Additionally, the response to the intervention varied among participants, highlighting the influence of individual factors. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: The findings emphasize the importance of extending behavioral interventions beyond the workplace to maintain sustainable reductions in sedentary behavior. To maximize health benefits, future interventions should consider personalized strategies that address sedentary behavior in the workplace and during leisure time. Moreover, the variability in individual responses suggests that more tailored interventions may be necessary to ensure widespread effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are there compensatory behaviors in response to a sit-stand desk intervention?\",\"authors\":\"Hélio Silva, Sabrina C Teno, Pedro B Júdice\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/joccuh/uiae067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Office workers represent one of the most sedentary groups. Alarmingly, more than a third of their sitting time during workdays occurs in prolonged bouts. Sit-stand desk (SSD) interventions have been found to be effective in reducing sitting time, but heterogeneity exists amongst studies, which may be due to compensations outside the workplace. This study aimed to assess the impact of a 6-month SSD intervention on office workers' sitting and standing times during the work shift and outside work (leisure time).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-arm (1:1) clustered randomized controlled trial was conducted with 38 participants randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. The intervention included a psychoeducational session, motivational prompts, and environmental modification (SSD implemented in the workplace). The waiting-list control group maintained the usual work conditions and only received the initial session. We employed repeated measures ANCOVA to compare changes between groups while adjusting for relevant covariates, with significance set at 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the intervention group, there was a significant reduction in sitting time at work by 32.97 min, along with a notable increase in standing time by 27.88 min (p<0.05). Although not significant (p>0.05), there was an increase in sitting time in the leisure context of about 23.07 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the effectiveness of SSD as a key strategy to mitigate sitting time among office workers. However, future interventions should consider integrating comprehensive behavioral strategies beyond the workplace to sustain potential increases in sitting time during the leisure time and avoid compensatory behaviors. What is already known on this topic: Sedentary behavior, particularly in the workplace, is associated with increased risks of non-communicable diseases and premature mortality. Previous studies have shown that sit-stand desk (SSD) interventions can significantly reduce sitting time at work. However, uncertainties remain about whether these effects persist outside of the workplace and if compensatory behaviors occur during leisure time.</p><p><strong>What this study adds: </strong>This study demonstrated that a 6-month SSD intervention resulted in a significant reduction of 32.97 minutes in sitting time during work hours and a corresponding increase in standing time. However, a non-significant increase of 23.07 minutes in sitting time during leisure was observed, suggesting potential compensatory behaviors outside of work. Additionally, the response to the intervention varied among participants, highlighting the influence of individual factors. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: The findings emphasize the importance of extending behavioral interventions beyond the workplace to maintain sustainable reductions in sedentary behavior. To maximize health benefits, future interventions should consider personalized strategies that address sedentary behavior in the workplace and during leisure time. Moreover, the variability in individual responses suggests that more tailored interventions may be necessary to ensure widespread effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:办公室工作人员是久坐不动的人群之一。令人担忧的是,他们工作日中超过三分之一的久坐时间是在长时间坐着的情况下发生的。研究发现,坐立办公桌(SSD)干预措施可有效减少久坐时间,但不同研究之间存在差异,这可能是由于工作场所以外的补偿因素造成的。本研究旨在评估为期6个月的站立办公桌干预措施对上班族在工作期间和工作之外(闲暇时间)的坐立时间的影响:研究采用双臂(1:1)分组随机对照试验,38 名参与者被随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预措施包括心理教育课程、动机提示和环境改造(在工作场所实施 SSD)。等待名单对照组则保持常规工作条件,只接受初始课程。我们采用了重复测量方差分析来比较组间的变化,同时调整了相关的协变量,显著性设定为 5%:结果:在干预组中,工作时的久坐时间显著减少了 32.97 分钟,站立时间显著增加了 27.88 分钟(P0.05),休闲时的久坐时间增加了约 23.07 分钟:这项研究表明,作为减少上班族久坐时间的一项重要策略,"额外站立时间 "非常有效。然而,未来的干预措施应考虑整合工作场所以外的综合行为策略,以维持闲暇时可能增加的久坐时间,并避免补偿行为。关于该主题的已知信息:久坐行为,尤其是工作场所的久坐行为,与非传染性疾病和过早死亡风险的增加有关。以往的研究表明,坐立办公桌(SSD)干预措施可以显著减少工作时的久坐时间。然而,这些效果是否会在工作场所以外的地方持续,以及在闲暇时间是否会出现补偿行为,仍存在不确定性:这项研究表明,为期 6 个月的固态办公桌干预措施可使上班时间的久坐时间显著减少 32.97 分钟,站立时间也相应增加。然而,在闲暇时间,坐着的时间却增加了 23.07 分钟,这并不明显,这表明在工作之外可能存在补偿行为。此外,不同参与者对干预措施的反应也不尽相同,这凸显了个体因素的影响。本研究可能对研究、实践或政策产生的影响:研究结果强调了将行为干预扩展到工作场所以外以保持久坐行为持续减少的重要性。为了最大限度地提高健康效益,未来的干预措施应考虑针对工作场所和闲暇时间久坐行为的个性化策略。此外,个体反应的差异性表明,可能有必要采取更有针对性的干预措施,以确保广泛的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are there compensatory behaviors in response to a sit-stand desk intervention?

Background: Office workers represent one of the most sedentary groups. Alarmingly, more than a third of their sitting time during workdays occurs in prolonged bouts. Sit-stand desk (SSD) interventions have been found to be effective in reducing sitting time, but heterogeneity exists amongst studies, which may be due to compensations outside the workplace. This study aimed to assess the impact of a 6-month SSD intervention on office workers' sitting and standing times during the work shift and outside work (leisure time).

Methods: A two-arm (1:1) clustered randomized controlled trial was conducted with 38 participants randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. The intervention included a psychoeducational session, motivational prompts, and environmental modification (SSD implemented in the workplace). The waiting-list control group maintained the usual work conditions and only received the initial session. We employed repeated measures ANCOVA to compare changes between groups while adjusting for relevant covariates, with significance set at 5%.

Results: In the intervention group, there was a significant reduction in sitting time at work by 32.97 min, along with a notable increase in standing time by 27.88 min (p<0.05). Although not significant (p>0.05), there was an increase in sitting time in the leisure context of about 23.07 min.

Conclusions: This study underscores the effectiveness of SSD as a key strategy to mitigate sitting time among office workers. However, future interventions should consider integrating comprehensive behavioral strategies beyond the workplace to sustain potential increases in sitting time during the leisure time and avoid compensatory behaviors. What is already known on this topic: Sedentary behavior, particularly in the workplace, is associated with increased risks of non-communicable diseases and premature mortality. Previous studies have shown that sit-stand desk (SSD) interventions can significantly reduce sitting time at work. However, uncertainties remain about whether these effects persist outside of the workplace and if compensatory behaviors occur during leisure time.

What this study adds: This study demonstrated that a 6-month SSD intervention resulted in a significant reduction of 32.97 minutes in sitting time during work hours and a corresponding increase in standing time. However, a non-significant increase of 23.07 minutes in sitting time during leisure was observed, suggesting potential compensatory behaviors outside of work. Additionally, the response to the intervention varied among participants, highlighting the influence of individual factors. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: The findings emphasize the importance of extending behavioral interventions beyond the workplace to maintain sustainable reductions in sedentary behavior. To maximize health benefits, future interventions should consider personalized strategies that address sedentary behavior in the workplace and during leisure time. Moreover, the variability in individual responses suggests that more tailored interventions may be necessary to ensure widespread effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信