肺移植支气管内活检:一个被遗忘的标本迎来了新时代。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kieran Halloran, Robin Vos, Greg Snell, John R Greenland
{"title":"肺移植支气管内活检:一个被遗忘的标本迎来了新时代。","authors":"Kieran Halloran, Robin Vos, Greg Snell, John R Greenland","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.10.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mucosal or endobronchial biopsies (EBB) are typically used in the diagnosis of directly visualized bronchial lesions, infection, and sarcoidosis, but their utility in the evaluation of lung transplant recipients is controversial. EBB represents an attractive alternative to transbronchial biopsy (TBB): EBB provides straightforward sampling of airway pathology with decreased complication rates due to minimal and visualizable bleeding and the elimination of pneumothorax risk. In lung transplant recipients, EBB may be obtained when TBB is too high-risk, including in the setting of acute lung allograft dysfunction (ALAD) requiring mechanical ventilation or in advanced chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Most centers do not include EBB in post-transplant surveillance or for-cause bronchoscopy protocols, possibly due to a lack of a common histologic interpretation system. Previous work has demonstrated that lymphocytic inflammation in lung transplant EBB is associated with acute cellular rejection and future risk for CLAD, but these have not translated into subsequent studies on clinical utility or into clinical practice. Recent multicenter studies suggest that gene expression-based diagnostics leveraging EBB may outperform histologic grading and provide important prognostic utility in predicting graft loss. Herein, we will review what is known about the lung transplant mucosa including recent diagnostic advances and propose how EBB analyses could be incorporated into research studies and clinical workflows. We propose that mucosal sampling could provide safe, consistent, and informative data to improve patient outcomes after lung transplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The lung transplant endobronchial biopsy: a forgotten specimen comes of age.\",\"authors\":\"Kieran Halloran, Robin Vos, Greg Snell, John R Greenland\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healun.2024.10.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mucosal or endobronchial biopsies (EBB) are typically used in the diagnosis of directly visualized bronchial lesions, infection, and sarcoidosis, but their utility in the evaluation of lung transplant recipients is controversial. EBB represents an attractive alternative to transbronchial biopsy (TBB): EBB provides straightforward sampling of airway pathology with decreased complication rates due to minimal and visualizable bleeding and the elimination of pneumothorax risk. In lung transplant recipients, EBB may be obtained when TBB is too high-risk, including in the setting of acute lung allograft dysfunction (ALAD) requiring mechanical ventilation or in advanced chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Most centers do not include EBB in post-transplant surveillance or for-cause bronchoscopy protocols, possibly due to a lack of a common histologic interpretation system. Previous work has demonstrated that lymphocytic inflammation in lung transplant EBB is associated with acute cellular rejection and future risk for CLAD, but these have not translated into subsequent studies on clinical utility or into clinical practice. Recent multicenter studies suggest that gene expression-based diagnostics leveraging EBB may outperform histologic grading and provide important prognostic utility in predicting graft loss. Herein, we will review what is known about the lung transplant mucosa including recent diagnostic advances and propose how EBB analyses could be incorporated into research studies and clinical workflows. We propose that mucosal sampling could provide safe, consistent, and informative data to improve patient outcomes after lung transplant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.10.019\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.10.019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粘膜或支气管内活检(EBB)通常用于诊断可直接观察到的支气管病变、感染和肉样瘤病,但其在肺移植受者评估中的实用性还存在争议。经支气管活检(TBB)是一种极具吸引力的替代方法:EBB 可直接采集气道病理样本,由于出血量少且可视,并消除了气胸风险,从而降低了并发症发生率。在肺移植受者中,当TBB风险过高时,包括需要机械通气的急性肺移植功能障碍(ALAD)或晚期慢性肺移植功能障碍(CLAD)时,可进行EBB。可能由于缺乏通用的组织学解释系统,大多数中心没有将 EBB 纳入移植后监测或因病支气管镜检查方案中。以前的研究表明,肺移植 EBB 中的淋巴细胞炎症与急性细胞排斥反应和未来的 CLAD 风险有关,但这些研究并未转化为后续的临床实用性研究或临床实践。最近的多中心研究表明,基于基因表达的EBB诊断可能优于组织学分级,并在预测移植物损失方面提供重要的预后效用。在此,我们将回顾对肺移植粘膜的了解,包括最近的诊断进展,并提出如何将 EBB 分析纳入研究和临床工作流程。我们建议,粘膜取样可提供安全、一致且信息丰富的数据,以改善肺移植后患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The lung transplant endobronchial biopsy: a forgotten specimen comes of age.

Mucosal or endobronchial biopsies (EBB) are typically used in the diagnosis of directly visualized bronchial lesions, infection, and sarcoidosis, but their utility in the evaluation of lung transplant recipients is controversial. EBB represents an attractive alternative to transbronchial biopsy (TBB): EBB provides straightforward sampling of airway pathology with decreased complication rates due to minimal and visualizable bleeding and the elimination of pneumothorax risk. In lung transplant recipients, EBB may be obtained when TBB is too high-risk, including in the setting of acute lung allograft dysfunction (ALAD) requiring mechanical ventilation or in advanced chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Most centers do not include EBB in post-transplant surveillance or for-cause bronchoscopy protocols, possibly due to a lack of a common histologic interpretation system. Previous work has demonstrated that lymphocytic inflammation in lung transplant EBB is associated with acute cellular rejection and future risk for CLAD, but these have not translated into subsequent studies on clinical utility or into clinical practice. Recent multicenter studies suggest that gene expression-based diagnostics leveraging EBB may outperform histologic grading and provide important prognostic utility in predicting graft loss. Herein, we will review what is known about the lung transplant mucosa including recent diagnostic advances and propose how EBB analyses could be incorporated into research studies and clinical workflows. We propose that mucosal sampling could provide safe, consistent, and informative data to improve patient outcomes after lung transplant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1667
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信