在临床直线加速器中采用不同介质和算法进行血液辐照的剂量学比较研究》(A Dosimetric Comparison Study for Blood Irradiation Using Different Medium and Algorithms in Clinical Linear Accelerator)。

IF 2.1 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Journal of Blood Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JBM.S476581
Sarath S Nair, Jyothi Nagesh, Shambhavi C, Anshul Singh, Shirley Lewis, Umesh Velu, Deepika Chenna
{"title":"在临床直线加速器中采用不同介质和算法进行血液辐照的剂量学比较研究》(A Dosimetric Comparison Study for Blood Irradiation Using Different Medium and Algorithms in Clinical Linear Accelerator)。","authors":"Sarath S Nair, Jyothi Nagesh, Shambhavi C, Anshul Singh, Shirley Lewis, Umesh Velu, Deepika Chenna","doi":"10.2147/JBM.S476581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify a suitable approach for blood irradiation other than the commonly used water medium and to study the impact of different algorithm dose computations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Water is the commonly used medium for blood irradiation. In this study computed tomography scans were taken with locally made blood irradiation phantoms other than water, by using air, rice powder and thermocole using parallel beam for 25 Gy. Plans were recalculated for different algorithms such as collapsed cone (CC), Monte Carlo (MC) and pencil beam (PB). The dose-volume parameters and measured doses were collected and analyzed for each medium and algorithm.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The monitor unit (MU) for rice powder and water are close (2461±57 and 2469±61, respectively), with a maximum dose of 28.0±1.8 and 28.0±1.9 Gy. The PB algorithm resulted in lower monitor unit values regardless of the medium used, generating values of 2418, 2406, 2382, and 2362 for water, rice powder, air, and Thermocol, respectively. A significant increase in dose was observed irrespective of the medium used when the MC algorithm was employed, with a maximum of 30.26 Gy in rice powder; a smaller dose was used when the CC algorithm was employed, with 26.3 Gy in water medium. The average maximum doses of all groups were equal using the one-way Anova statistical test. Regarding the impact of field size, rice powder appears to have consistent doses across various field sizes, with slight increases as field size grows, which is similar to water.</p><p><strong>Novelty/applications: </strong>While water is the conventional medium, this study highlights the potential benefits of rice powder, such as eliminating the risks associated with bubble formation and water spillage, which can lead to equipment malfunction and safety hazards. Although previous studies have explored rice powder as a bolus and tissue-equivalent material, this study uniquely applies this knowledge to blood irradiation, an area where rice powder has not been thoroughly investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":15166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Blood Medicine","volume":"15 ","pages":"449-458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Dosimetric Comparison Study for Blood Irradiation Employing Different Medium and Algorithms in Clinical Linear Accelerator.\",\"authors\":\"Sarath S Nair, Jyothi Nagesh, Shambhavi C, Anshul Singh, Shirley Lewis, Umesh Velu, Deepika Chenna\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JBM.S476581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify a suitable approach for blood irradiation other than the commonly used water medium and to study the impact of different algorithm dose computations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Water is the commonly used medium for blood irradiation. In this study computed tomography scans were taken with locally made blood irradiation phantoms other than water, by using air, rice powder and thermocole using parallel beam for 25 Gy. Plans were recalculated for different algorithms such as collapsed cone (CC), Monte Carlo (MC) and pencil beam (PB). The dose-volume parameters and measured doses were collected and analyzed for each medium and algorithm.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The monitor unit (MU) for rice powder and water are close (2461±57 and 2469±61, respectively), with a maximum dose of 28.0±1.8 and 28.0±1.9 Gy. The PB algorithm resulted in lower monitor unit values regardless of the medium used, generating values of 2418, 2406, 2382, and 2362 for water, rice powder, air, and Thermocol, respectively. A significant increase in dose was observed irrespective of the medium used when the MC algorithm was employed, with a maximum of 30.26 Gy in rice powder; a smaller dose was used when the CC algorithm was employed, with 26.3 Gy in water medium. The average maximum doses of all groups were equal using the one-way Anova statistical test. Regarding the impact of field size, rice powder appears to have consistent doses across various field sizes, with slight increases as field size grows, which is similar to water.</p><p><strong>Novelty/applications: </strong>While water is the conventional medium, this study highlights the potential benefits of rice powder, such as eliminating the risks associated with bubble formation and water spillage, which can lead to equipment malfunction and safety hazards. Although previous studies have explored rice powder as a bolus and tissue-equivalent material, this study uniquely applies this knowledge to blood irradiation, an area where rice powder has not been thoroughly investigated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Blood Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"449-458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523925/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Blood Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S476581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Blood Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S476581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的除常用的水介质外,确定一种合适的血液辐照方法,并研究不同算法剂量计算的影响:方法:水是常用的血液照射介质。方法:水是常用的血液辐照介质。在本研究中,使用空气、米粉和热电偶等本地制作的血液辐照模型进行计算机断层扫描,辐照剂量为 25 Gy。根据不同的算法,如塌缩锥(CC)、蒙特卡罗(MC)和铅笔束(PB),重新计算了计划。收集并分析了每种介质和算法的剂量-体积参数和测量剂量:米粉和水的监测单位(MU)接近(分别为 2461±57 和 2469±61),最大剂量分别为 28.0±1.8 和 28.0±1.9 Gy。无论使用哪种介质,PB 算法的监测单位值都较低,水、米粉、空气和热巧克力的监测单位值分别为 2418、2406、2382 和 2362。采用 MC 算法时,无论使用何种介质,剂量都有明显增加,米粉的最大剂量为 30.26 Gy;采用 CC 算法时,剂量较小,水介质的最大剂量为 26.3 Gy。经单向 Anova 统计检验,各组的平均最大剂量相等。关于田块大小的影响,大米粉在各种田块大小中的剂量似乎是一致的,随着田块大小的增加而略有增加,这与水的情况类似:虽然水是传统的介质,但这项研究强调了米粉的潜在优势,如消除了与气泡形成和水溢出有关的风险,这些风险可能导致设备故障和安全隐患。虽然之前的研究已经将米粉作为栓剂和组织等效材料进行了探讨,但这项研究独特地将这一知识应用于血液辐照,而在血液辐照领域,对米粉的研究还不够深入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Dosimetric Comparison Study for Blood Irradiation Employing Different Medium and Algorithms in Clinical Linear Accelerator.

Objective: To identify a suitable approach for blood irradiation other than the commonly used water medium and to study the impact of different algorithm dose computations.

Methods: Water is the commonly used medium for blood irradiation. In this study computed tomography scans were taken with locally made blood irradiation phantoms other than water, by using air, rice powder and thermocole using parallel beam for 25 Gy. Plans were recalculated for different algorithms such as collapsed cone (CC), Monte Carlo (MC) and pencil beam (PB). The dose-volume parameters and measured doses were collected and analyzed for each medium and algorithm.

Findings: The monitor unit (MU) for rice powder and water are close (2461±57 and 2469±61, respectively), with a maximum dose of 28.0±1.8 and 28.0±1.9 Gy. The PB algorithm resulted in lower monitor unit values regardless of the medium used, generating values of 2418, 2406, 2382, and 2362 for water, rice powder, air, and Thermocol, respectively. A significant increase in dose was observed irrespective of the medium used when the MC algorithm was employed, with a maximum of 30.26 Gy in rice powder; a smaller dose was used when the CC algorithm was employed, with 26.3 Gy in water medium. The average maximum doses of all groups were equal using the one-way Anova statistical test. Regarding the impact of field size, rice powder appears to have consistent doses across various field sizes, with slight increases as field size grows, which is similar to water.

Novelty/applications: While water is the conventional medium, this study highlights the potential benefits of rice powder, such as eliminating the risks associated with bubble formation and water spillage, which can lead to equipment malfunction and safety hazards. Although previous studies have explored rice powder as a bolus and tissue-equivalent material, this study uniquely applies this knowledge to blood irradiation, an area where rice powder has not been thoroughly investigated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Blood Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal publishing laboratory, experimental and clinical aspects of all topics pertaining to blood based medicine including but not limited to: Transfusion Medicine (blood components, stem cell transplantation, apheresis, gene based therapeutics), Blood collection, Donor issues, Transmittable diseases, and Blood banking logistics, Immunohematology, Artificial and alternative blood based therapeutics, Hematology including disorders/pathology related to leukocytes/immunology, red cells, platelets and hemostasis, Biotechnology/nanotechnology of blood related medicine, Legal aspects of blood medicine, Historical perspectives. Original research, short reports, reviews, case reports and commentaries are invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信