白癜风面积评分指数的心理特性和有意义变化阈值。

IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Khaled Ezzedine, Ahmed M Soliman, Heidi S Camp, Mary Kate Ladd, Robin Pokrzywinski, Karin S Coyne, Rohini Sen, Bethanee J Schlosser, Jung Min Bae, Iltefat Hamzavi
{"title":"白癜风面积评分指数的心理特性和有意义变化阈值。","authors":"Khaled Ezzedine, Ahmed M Soliman, Heidi S Camp, Mary Kate Ladd, Robin Pokrzywinski, Karin S Coyne, Rohini Sen, Bethanee J Schlosser, Jung Min Bae, Iltefat Hamzavi","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Defining meaningful improvement using the Total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI) and the Facial VASI (F-VASI) aids interpretation of findings from clinical trials evaluating vitiligo treatments; however, clear and clinically meaningful thresholds have not yet been established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess concept validity and measurement performance of the T-VASI and F-VASI in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo and to identify meaningful change thresholds.</p><p><strong>Design, settings, and participants: </strong>This mixed-methods study consisted of a secondary analysis of a phase 2 multicenter double-blind dose-ranging randomized clinical trial and embedded qualitative interviews conducted at 35 sites in Canada, France, Japan, and the US. The secondary analysis included the trial's adult patients with nonsegmental vitiligo (T-VASI ≥5 and F-VASI ≥0.5 at baseline). Psychometric performance of the T-VASI and F-VASI and thresholds for meaningful change were evaluated using clinician- and patient-reported information. The trial's embedded interviews were used to qualitatively assess content validity and patient perceptions of meaningful repigmentation. Data analyses were performed from March to July 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomized to 6-, 11-, or 22-mg/day upadacitinib or placebo for 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Psychometric performance of the T-VASI and F-VASI and thresholds for meaningful changed plus content validity and patient perceptions of meaningful repigmentation. Measurement instruments included the T-VASI, F-VASI, Vitiligo Noticeability Scale, Total-Patient Global Vitiligo Assessment, Face-Patient Global Vitiligo Assessment, Total-Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment (PhGVA-T), Face-Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment (PhGVA-F), Patient's Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo, Physician's Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo (PhGIC-V), Vitiligo Quality-of-Life Instrument, Dermatology Life Quality Index, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and transcribed verbatim interviews with patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The psychometric analysis included 164 participants (mean [SD] age, 46 years; 103 [63%] females) and the qualitative analysis included 14 participants (mean [SD] age, 48.8 [12.2] years; 9 females [64%] and 5 males [36%]). Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.98 for T-VASI and 0.99 for F-VASI in patients with clinically stable vitiligo between baseline and week 4, supporting test-retest reliability. At baseline and week 24, correlations were moderate to strong between T-VASI and PhGVA-T (r = 0.63-0.65) and between F-VASI and PhGVA-F (r = 0.65-0.71). Average baseline and week-24 VASI scores decreased with repigmentation (ie, increasing PhGVA scores). Least-square mean VASI scores increased with greater repigmentation as measured by the PhGIC-V. Least-square mean VASI scores also differed between patients with improved PhGIC-V and those with no change or worsened V-PhGIC scores. Using a multiple anchor approach, improvements of 30% in T-VASI and 50% in F-VASI scores reflected meaningful repigmentation between baseline and week 24.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>This mixed-methods study found that the T-VASI and F-VASI are reliable, valid, able to differentiate between clinically distinct groups, and responsive in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo. The thresholds for meaningful change were lower than those historically used in clinical trials, suggesting that T-VASI 50 and F-VASI 75 are conservative estimates and reflect improvements that would be meaningful in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04927975.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties and Meaningful Change Thresholds of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.\",\"authors\":\"Khaled Ezzedine, Ahmed M Soliman, Heidi S Camp, Mary Kate Ladd, Robin Pokrzywinski, Karin S Coyne, Rohini Sen, Bethanee J Schlosser, Jung Min Bae, Iltefat Hamzavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Defining meaningful improvement using the Total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI) and the Facial VASI (F-VASI) aids interpretation of findings from clinical trials evaluating vitiligo treatments; however, clear and clinically meaningful thresholds have not yet been established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess concept validity and measurement performance of the T-VASI and F-VASI in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo and to identify meaningful change thresholds.</p><p><strong>Design, settings, and participants: </strong>This mixed-methods study consisted of a secondary analysis of a phase 2 multicenter double-blind dose-ranging randomized clinical trial and embedded qualitative interviews conducted at 35 sites in Canada, France, Japan, and the US. The secondary analysis included the trial's adult patients with nonsegmental vitiligo (T-VASI ≥5 and F-VASI ≥0.5 at baseline). Psychometric performance of the T-VASI and F-VASI and thresholds for meaningful change were evaluated using clinician- and patient-reported information. The trial's embedded interviews were used to qualitatively assess content validity and patient perceptions of meaningful repigmentation. Data analyses were performed from March to July 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomized to 6-, 11-, or 22-mg/day upadacitinib or placebo for 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Psychometric performance of the T-VASI and F-VASI and thresholds for meaningful changed plus content validity and patient perceptions of meaningful repigmentation. Measurement instruments included the T-VASI, F-VASI, Vitiligo Noticeability Scale, Total-Patient Global Vitiligo Assessment, Face-Patient Global Vitiligo Assessment, Total-Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment (PhGVA-T), Face-Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment (PhGVA-F), Patient's Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo, Physician's Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo (PhGIC-V), Vitiligo Quality-of-Life Instrument, Dermatology Life Quality Index, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and transcribed verbatim interviews with patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The psychometric analysis included 164 participants (mean [SD] age, 46 years; 103 [63%] females) and the qualitative analysis included 14 participants (mean [SD] age, 48.8 [12.2] years; 9 females [64%] and 5 males [36%]). Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.98 for T-VASI and 0.99 for F-VASI in patients with clinically stable vitiligo between baseline and week 4, supporting test-retest reliability. At baseline and week 24, correlations were moderate to strong between T-VASI and PhGVA-T (r = 0.63-0.65) and between F-VASI and PhGVA-F (r = 0.65-0.71). Average baseline and week-24 VASI scores decreased with repigmentation (ie, increasing PhGVA scores). Least-square mean VASI scores increased with greater repigmentation as measured by the PhGIC-V. Least-square mean VASI scores also differed between patients with improved PhGIC-V and those with no change or worsened V-PhGIC scores. Using a multiple anchor approach, improvements of 30% in T-VASI and 50% in F-VASI scores reflected meaningful repigmentation between baseline and week 24.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>This mixed-methods study found that the T-VASI and F-VASI are reliable, valid, able to differentiate between clinically distinct groups, and responsive in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo. The thresholds for meaningful change were lower than those historically used in clinical trials, suggesting that T-VASI 50 and F-VASI 75 are conservative estimates and reflect improvements that would be meaningful in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04927975.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA dermatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581646/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4534\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4534","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:使用白癜风面积总评分指数(T-VASI)和面部VASI(F-VASI)来定义有意义的改善有助于解释评估白癜风治疗方法的临床试验结果;然而,目前尚未确定明确且有临床意义的阈值:评估T-VASI和F-VASI在非节段性白癜风患者中的概念有效性和测量性能,并确定有意义的变化阈值:这项混合方法研究包括对一项第 2 期多中心双盲剂量范围随机临床试验的二次分析,以及在加拿大、法国、日本和美国 35 个地点进行的嵌入式定性访谈。二次分析包括试验中的非节段性白癜风成年患者(基线时T-VASI≥5,F-VASI≥0.5)。利用临床医生和患者报告的信息评估了T-VASI和F-VASI的心理测量性能以及有意义变化的阈值。试验的嵌入式访谈用于定性评估内容效度和患者对有意义再色素沉着的看法。数据分析于 2023 年 3 月至 7 月进行:参与者随机接受每天6、11或22毫克的达达替尼或安慰剂治疗,为期24周:主要结果:T-VASI和F-VASI的心理测量性能和有意义改变的阈值,以及内容效度和患者对有意义再色素沉着的看法。测量工具包括 T-VASI、F-VASI、白癜风可察觉性量表、患者整体白癜风评估、面部患者整体白癜风评估、医生整体白癜风评估 (PhGVA-T)、面部医生整体白癜风评估 (PhGVA-F)、患者对变化的总体印象--白癜风、医生对变化的总体印象--白癜风(PhGIC-V)、白癜风生活质量量表、皮肤科生活质量指数、医院焦虑和抑郁量表,以及对患者的逐字记录访谈。结果:心理测量分析包括 164 名参与者(平均 [SD] 年龄 46 岁;103 [63%] 名女性),定性分析包括 14 名参与者(平均 [SD] 年龄 48.8 [12.2] 岁;9 名女性 [64%] 和 5 名男性 [36%])。在基线和第4周之间,临床稳定期白癜风患者的T-VASI类内相关系数为0.98,F-VASI类内相关系数为0.99,证明了测试-复测的可靠性。在基线和第24周,T-VASI和PhGVA-T(r = 0.63-0.65)以及F-VASI和PhGVA-F(r = 0.65-0.71)之间存在中度到高度相关性。基线和第 24 周的平均 VASI 分数随着再色素沉着(即 PhGVA 分数增加)而降低。根据 PhGIC-V 测量,VASI 的最小平方平均分随着色素再沉着程度的增加而增加。PhGIC-V评分改善的患者与V-PhGIC评分无变化或恶化的患者之间的最小平方平均VASI评分也有所不同。使用多锚方法,T-VASI 和 F-VASI 评分分别提高了 30% 和 50%,这反映出在基线和第 24 周之间存在有意义的再色素沉着:这项混合方法研究发现,T-VASI 和 F-VASI 可靠、有效,能够区分临床上不同的群体,对非节段型白癜风患者反应灵敏。有意义变化的阈值低于临床试验中历来使用的阈值,表明T-VASI 50和F-VASI 75是保守的估计值,反映了对非节段性白癜风患者有意义的改善:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04927975。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Properties and Meaningful Change Thresholds of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.

Importance: Defining meaningful improvement using the Total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI) and the Facial VASI (F-VASI) aids interpretation of findings from clinical trials evaluating vitiligo treatments; however, clear and clinically meaningful thresholds have not yet been established.

Objective: To assess concept validity and measurement performance of the T-VASI and F-VASI in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo and to identify meaningful change thresholds.

Design, settings, and participants: This mixed-methods study consisted of a secondary analysis of a phase 2 multicenter double-blind dose-ranging randomized clinical trial and embedded qualitative interviews conducted at 35 sites in Canada, France, Japan, and the US. The secondary analysis included the trial's adult patients with nonsegmental vitiligo (T-VASI ≥5 and F-VASI ≥0.5 at baseline). Psychometric performance of the T-VASI and F-VASI and thresholds for meaningful change were evaluated using clinician- and patient-reported information. The trial's embedded interviews were used to qualitatively assess content validity and patient perceptions of meaningful repigmentation. Data analyses were performed from March to July 2023.

Intervention: Participants were randomized to 6-, 11-, or 22-mg/day upadacitinib or placebo for 24 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: Psychometric performance of the T-VASI and F-VASI and thresholds for meaningful changed plus content validity and patient perceptions of meaningful repigmentation. Measurement instruments included the T-VASI, F-VASI, Vitiligo Noticeability Scale, Total-Patient Global Vitiligo Assessment, Face-Patient Global Vitiligo Assessment, Total-Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment (PhGVA-T), Face-Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment (PhGVA-F), Patient's Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo, Physician's Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo (PhGIC-V), Vitiligo Quality-of-Life Instrument, Dermatology Life Quality Index, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and transcribed verbatim interviews with patients.

Results: The psychometric analysis included 164 participants (mean [SD] age, 46 years; 103 [63%] females) and the qualitative analysis included 14 participants (mean [SD] age, 48.8 [12.2] years; 9 females [64%] and 5 males [36%]). Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.98 for T-VASI and 0.99 for F-VASI in patients with clinically stable vitiligo between baseline and week 4, supporting test-retest reliability. At baseline and week 24, correlations were moderate to strong between T-VASI and PhGVA-T (r = 0.63-0.65) and between F-VASI and PhGVA-F (r = 0.65-0.71). Average baseline and week-24 VASI scores decreased with repigmentation (ie, increasing PhGVA scores). Least-square mean VASI scores increased with greater repigmentation as measured by the PhGIC-V. Least-square mean VASI scores also differed between patients with improved PhGIC-V and those with no change or worsened V-PhGIC scores. Using a multiple anchor approach, improvements of 30% in T-VASI and 50% in F-VASI scores reflected meaningful repigmentation between baseline and week 24.

Conclusion and relevance: This mixed-methods study found that the T-VASI and F-VASI are reliable, valid, able to differentiate between clinically distinct groups, and responsive in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo. The thresholds for meaningful change were lower than those historically used in clinical trials, suggesting that T-VASI 50 and F-VASI 75 are conservative estimates and reflect improvements that would be meaningful in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04927975.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA dermatology
JAMA dermatology DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
5.50%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery. JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care. The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists. JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信