{"title":"髋关节发育不良的翻修开放复位术。","authors":"Nabil Alassaf","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06358-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Re-dislocation after open reduction remains a challenge in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Few geographically and temporally diverse reports exist on the topic. The aim of this study was to uncover the outcome in a group of DDH patients who underwent repeat open reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who had DDH surgery were screened at one hospital, spanning a ten-year period. Patients who underwent repeat open reduction for re-dislocation were included. Clinical data and radiographic parameters were obtained. This is a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three revision open reductions were included. The median age (interquartile range) was 40 (26-61) months and the median follow-up duration was 26 (14-55.50) months. Fifteen revisions (65%) had at least one notable complication. Recurrent instability was found in nine revisions (39%), and other complications included avascular necrosis, stiffness and leg length discrepancy in 12 revisions (52%). Although it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.13), all hips with pre-revision international hip dysplasia institute grade III (n = 4), compared to grade IV, remained stable after the re-operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a substantial risk of dismal prognosis after repeat open reduction. Moreover, every precaution should be taken during the first surgery to reduce the risk of re-operation. Findings from this study may help inform surgeons and caregivers about the probable negative outcome when contemplating repeat open reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"177-182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revision open reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip.\",\"authors\":\"Nabil Alassaf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-024-06358-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Re-dislocation after open reduction remains a challenge in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Few geographically and temporally diverse reports exist on the topic. The aim of this study was to uncover the outcome in a group of DDH patients who underwent repeat open reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who had DDH surgery were screened at one hospital, spanning a ten-year period. Patients who underwent repeat open reduction for re-dislocation were included. Clinical data and radiographic parameters were obtained. This is a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three revision open reductions were included. The median age (interquartile range) was 40 (26-61) months and the median follow-up duration was 26 (14-55.50) months. Fifteen revisions (65%) had at least one notable complication. Recurrent instability was found in nine revisions (39%), and other complications included avascular necrosis, stiffness and leg length discrepancy in 12 revisions (52%). Although it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.13), all hips with pre-revision international hip dysplasia institute grade III (n = 4), compared to grade IV, remained stable after the re-operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a substantial risk of dismal prognosis after repeat open reduction. Moreover, every precaution should be taken during the first surgery to reduce the risk of re-operation. Findings from this study may help inform surgeons and caregivers about the probable negative outcome when contemplating repeat open reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"177-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06358-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06358-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Revision open reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Purpose: Re-dislocation after open reduction remains a challenge in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Few geographically and temporally diverse reports exist on the topic. The aim of this study was to uncover the outcome in a group of DDH patients who underwent repeat open reduction.
Methods: All patients who had DDH surgery were screened at one hospital, spanning a ten-year period. Patients who underwent repeat open reduction for re-dislocation were included. Clinical data and radiographic parameters were obtained. This is a retrospective cohort study.
Results: Twenty-three revision open reductions were included. The median age (interquartile range) was 40 (26-61) months and the median follow-up duration was 26 (14-55.50) months. Fifteen revisions (65%) had at least one notable complication. Recurrent instability was found in nine revisions (39%), and other complications included avascular necrosis, stiffness and leg length discrepancy in 12 revisions (52%). Although it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.13), all hips with pre-revision international hip dysplasia institute grade III (n = 4), compared to grade IV, remained stable after the re-operation.
Conclusions: There is a substantial risk of dismal prognosis after repeat open reduction. Moreover, every precaution should be taken during the first surgery to reduce the risk of re-operation. Findings from this study may help inform surgeons and caregivers about the probable negative outcome when contemplating repeat open reduction.
期刊介绍:
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.