在第 2 天有较多四细胞胚胎的周期中,移植由两个四细胞胚胎发育而成的双裂胚胎可能不是最佳治疗策略。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jun Zhang, Shuang Liu, Yunzhu Lan, Shaowei Chen, Ying Wan, Fang Wang
{"title":"在第 2 天有较多四细胞胚胎的周期中,移植由两个四细胞胚胎发育而成的双裂胚胎可能不是最佳治疗策略。","authors":"Jun Zhang, Shuang Liu, Yunzhu Lan, Shaowei Chen, Ying Wan, Fang Wang","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the impact of the number of Day 2 four-cell (D2-4C) embryos on double embryo transfer and blastocyst culture therapy in the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on 1039 blastocyst culture cycles to compare outcomes between available and unavailable blastocyst cycles, emphasizing the relationship between the number of D2-4C embryos and blastocyst availability. Furthermore, the correlation between four-cell embryo counts and live births was analyzed in 986 transfer cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that the number of D2-4C embryos independently influenced the availability of blastocysts (odds ratio [OR] 1.693, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.306-2.195, P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that D2-4C embryos displayed the highest predictive value for available blastocysts, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.861 (95% CI 0.826-0.896). The cut-off point was determined to be 4.5, particularly for individuals younger than 25 years, where the AUC reached 0.927. This suggests that the number of D2-4C embryos has significant predictive value for available blastocysts. The live birth rate (LBR) of fresh embryo transfers significantly increased with the number of D2-4C embryos (P = 0.004). LBRs for zero, one, and two four-cell embryos in double cleavage embryo transfer were 20.24%, 34.97%, and 38.08%, respectively (P = 0.005). In the twin group, the percentages for zero, one, and two four-cell embryos were 1.21%, 9.75%, and 89.02%, respectively (P < 0.001). Single blastocyst transfer achieved an LBR comparable to that of two four-cell embryos (34.8% vs 39.0%, P = 0.415), while the twin rate significantly decreased with single blastocyst transfer (25.17% vs 1.40%, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The number of D2-4C embryos exhibits significant predictive value for available blastocysts, particularly among young women. Furthermore, most twins resulted from the transfer of double cleavage embryos derived from two four-cell embryos. Consequently, when the D2-4C count exceeds four in a cycle, blastocyst culture therapy is preferred over double cleavage-stage embryo transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The transfer of double cleavage embryos developed from two four-cell embryos may not represent an optimal treatment strategy in cycles with a greater number of four-cell embryos on Day 2.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Zhang, Shuang Liu, Yunzhu Lan, Shaowei Chen, Ying Wan, Fang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.15977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the impact of the number of Day 2 four-cell (D2-4C) embryos on double embryo transfer and blastocyst culture therapy in the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on 1039 blastocyst culture cycles to compare outcomes between available and unavailable blastocyst cycles, emphasizing the relationship between the number of D2-4C embryos and blastocyst availability. Furthermore, the correlation between four-cell embryo counts and live births was analyzed in 986 transfer cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that the number of D2-4C embryos independently influenced the availability of blastocysts (odds ratio [OR] 1.693, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.306-2.195, P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that D2-4C embryos displayed the highest predictive value for available blastocysts, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.861 (95% CI 0.826-0.896). The cut-off point was determined to be 4.5, particularly for individuals younger than 25 years, where the AUC reached 0.927. This suggests that the number of D2-4C embryos has significant predictive value for available blastocysts. The live birth rate (LBR) of fresh embryo transfers significantly increased with the number of D2-4C embryos (P = 0.004). LBRs for zero, one, and two four-cell embryos in double cleavage embryo transfer were 20.24%, 34.97%, and 38.08%, respectively (P = 0.005). In the twin group, the percentages for zero, one, and two four-cell embryos were 1.21%, 9.75%, and 89.02%, respectively (P < 0.001). Single blastocyst transfer achieved an LBR comparable to that of two four-cell embryos (34.8% vs 39.0%, P = 0.415), while the twin rate significantly decreased with single blastocyst transfer (25.17% vs 1.40%, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The number of D2-4C embryos exhibits significant predictive value for available blastocysts, particularly among young women. Furthermore, most twins resulted from the transfer of double cleavage embryos derived from two four-cell embryos. Consequently, when the D2-4C count exceeds four in a cycle, blastocyst culture therapy is preferred over double cleavage-stage embryo transfer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15977\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究探讨了第 2 天四细胞(D2-4C)胚胎数量对首个体外受精(IVF)周期中双胚胎移植和囊胚培养治疗的影响:方法:对 1039 个囊胚培养周期进行回顾性研究,比较可用和不可用囊胚周期的结果,强调 D2-4C 胚胎数量与囊胚可用性之间的关系。此外,还分析了 986 个移植周期中四细胞胚胎数与活产之间的相关性:分析结果显示,D2-4C 胚胎数量对囊胚可用性有独立影响(几率比 [OR] 1.693,95% 置信区间 [CI]1.306-2.195,P 结论:D2-4C 胚胎数量对囊胚可用性有独立影响:D2-4C 胚胎数量对囊胚可用性具有显著的预测价值,尤其是在年轻女性中。此外,大多数双胞胎是由两个四细胞胚胎的双裂胚胎移植而来。因此,当一个周期中的 D2-4C 数量超过 4 个时,囊胚培养疗法比双裂期胚胎移植更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The transfer of double cleavage embryos developed from two four-cell embryos may not represent an optimal treatment strategy in cycles with a greater number of four-cell embryos on Day 2.

Objective: This study examined the impact of the number of Day 2 four-cell (D2-4C) embryos on double embryo transfer and blastocyst culture therapy in the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 1039 blastocyst culture cycles to compare outcomes between available and unavailable blastocyst cycles, emphasizing the relationship between the number of D2-4C embryos and blastocyst availability. Furthermore, the correlation between four-cell embryo counts and live births was analyzed in 986 transfer cycles.

Results: The analysis revealed that the number of D2-4C embryos independently influenced the availability of blastocysts (odds ratio [OR] 1.693, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.306-2.195, P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that D2-4C embryos displayed the highest predictive value for available blastocysts, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.861 (95% CI 0.826-0.896). The cut-off point was determined to be 4.5, particularly for individuals younger than 25 years, where the AUC reached 0.927. This suggests that the number of D2-4C embryos has significant predictive value for available blastocysts. The live birth rate (LBR) of fresh embryo transfers significantly increased with the number of D2-4C embryos (P = 0.004). LBRs for zero, one, and two four-cell embryos in double cleavage embryo transfer were 20.24%, 34.97%, and 38.08%, respectively (P = 0.005). In the twin group, the percentages for zero, one, and two four-cell embryos were 1.21%, 9.75%, and 89.02%, respectively (P < 0.001). Single blastocyst transfer achieved an LBR comparable to that of two four-cell embryos (34.8% vs 39.0%, P = 0.415), while the twin rate significantly decreased with single blastocyst transfer (25.17% vs 1.40%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The number of D2-4C embryos exhibits significant predictive value for available blastocysts, particularly among young women. Furthermore, most twins resulted from the transfer of double cleavage embryos derived from two four-cell embryos. Consequently, when the D2-4C count exceeds four in a cycle, blastocyst culture therapy is preferred over double cleavage-stage embryo transfer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信