蛛网膜下腔出血的院内风险因素和短期疗效。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S493510
Yao Liu, Cunsheng Wei
{"title":"蛛网膜下腔出血的院内风险因素和短期疗效。","authors":"Yao Liu, Cunsheng Wei","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S493510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the relevant factors affecting the prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>284 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage who were hospitalized in our hospital from January 1, 2022 to June 30, 2024 were selected and divided into a good prognosis group and a poor prognosis group according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The general clinical data of the patients were also collected, and the independent risk factors affecting the poor prognosis of the patients were screened by univariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with a favorable prognosis had a lower incidence rate of rebleeding (4.72% vs 17.65%; <i>P</i> =0.001), electrolyte disturbances (21.46% vs 41.18%; <i>P</i> <0.001), lower respiratory tract infection (5.58% vs 35.29%; <i>P</i> <0.001), urinary tract infection (1.72% vs 15.69%; <i>P</i> <0.001) and gastrointestinal infection (2.15% vs 11.76%; <i>P</i> <0.001) than patients with an unfavorable prognosis. Therefore, coinfection is an independent risk factor for prognosis. After adjusting for covariates, logistic regression analysis identified the prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage was related to coinfections (adjusted odds ratio =2.057; 95% CI: 1.516~2.791; <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coinfection is a very important independent risk factor affecting prognosis, and clinical care should focus on how to reduce coinfection during hospitalization in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and treat it aggressively to reduce mortality and disability and improve patient prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-Hospital Risk Factors and Short-Term Outcomes for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.\",\"authors\":\"Yao Liu, Cunsheng Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJGM.S493510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the relevant factors affecting the prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>284 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage who were hospitalized in our hospital from January 1, 2022 to June 30, 2024 were selected and divided into a good prognosis group and a poor prognosis group according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The general clinical data of the patients were also collected, and the independent risk factors affecting the poor prognosis of the patients were screened by univariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with a favorable prognosis had a lower incidence rate of rebleeding (4.72% vs 17.65%; <i>P</i> =0.001), electrolyte disturbances (21.46% vs 41.18%; <i>P</i> <0.001), lower respiratory tract infection (5.58% vs 35.29%; <i>P</i> <0.001), urinary tract infection (1.72% vs 15.69%; <i>P</i> <0.001) and gastrointestinal infection (2.15% vs 11.76%; <i>P</i> <0.001) than patients with an unfavorable prognosis. Therefore, coinfection is an independent risk factor for prognosis. After adjusting for covariates, logistic regression analysis identified the prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage was related to coinfections (adjusted odds ratio =2.057; 95% CI: 1.516~2.791; <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coinfection is a very important independent risk factor affecting prognosis, and clinical care should focus on how to reduce coinfection during hospitalization in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and treat it aggressively to reduce mortality and disability and improve patient prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520910/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S493510\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S493510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨影响蛛网膜下腔出血预后的相关因素:方法:选取2022年1月1日至2024年6月30日在我院住院治疗的284例蛛网膜下腔出血患者,根据改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分将其分为预后良好组和预后不良组。同时收集患者的一般临床资料,并通过单变量逻辑回归分析筛选出影响患者预后不良的独立危险因素:结果:预后良好的患者再出血(4.72% vs 17.65%;P =0.001)、电解质紊乱(21.46% vs 41.18%;P P P P PConclusion)发生率较低:合并感染是影响预后的一个非常重要的独立危险因素,临床护理应关注如何减少蛛网膜下腔出血患者住院期间的合并感染,并积极治疗,以降低死亡率和致残率,改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-Hospital Risk Factors and Short-Term Outcomes for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Objective: To explore the relevant factors affecting the prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Methods: 284 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage who were hospitalized in our hospital from January 1, 2022 to June 30, 2024 were selected and divided into a good prognosis group and a poor prognosis group according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The general clinical data of the patients were also collected, and the independent risk factors affecting the poor prognosis of the patients were screened by univariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Patients with a favorable prognosis had a lower incidence rate of rebleeding (4.72% vs 17.65%; P =0.001), electrolyte disturbances (21.46% vs 41.18%; P <0.001), lower respiratory tract infection (5.58% vs 35.29%; P <0.001), urinary tract infection (1.72% vs 15.69%; P <0.001) and gastrointestinal infection (2.15% vs 11.76%; P <0.001) than patients with an unfavorable prognosis. Therefore, coinfection is an independent risk factor for prognosis. After adjusting for covariates, logistic regression analysis identified the prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage was related to coinfections (adjusted odds ratio =2.057; 95% CI: 1.516~2.791; P<0.001).

Conclusion: Coinfection is a very important independent risk factor affecting prognosis, and clinical care should focus on how to reduce coinfection during hospitalization in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and treat it aggressively to reduce mortality and disability and improve patient prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信