Antonio Mendoza Ladd, Amer Alsamman, Karleen Meiklejohn, Omar Viramontes
{"title":"经皮使用新型内窥镜超声波电芯针活检装置的初步经验:病例系列。","authors":"Antonio Mendoza Ladd, Amer Alsamman, Karleen Meiklejohn, Omar Viramontes","doi":"10.1055/a-2427-2311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy via fine-needle biopsy/fine-needle aspiration (FNB/FNA) is currently the standard method to sample tumors in the mediastinum and abdomen. Although specimens obtained with these needles are acceptable, a histological diagnosis is not always possible. Recently, a new EUS-guided core needle biopsy (EUS-CNB) device became available. Herein, we describe the first experience with its use in a transmural fashion. <b>Patients and methods</b> This was a case series of patients who underwent EUS-CNB at an academic center. All patients provided written informed consent and were observed in the hospital ≥ 48 hours after the procedure. <b>Results</b> A total of 8 patients underwent EUSC-CNB: five in the pancreas, two in the retroperitoneum, and one in the mediastinum. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-CNB was 100% after one actuation. In four patients, same-session FNB and EUS-CNB were obtained from the same lesion with superior tissue sample in the latter. No adverse events were documented. <b>Conclusions</b> To our knowledge this is the first report on transmural use of EUS-CNB in gastroenterology. Our findings suggest that the device is effective and safe. Larger studies comparing it with FNA/FNB needles will be required to further assess performance and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 10","pages":"E1237-E1241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial experience with transmural use of a new endoscopic ultrasound electric core needle biopsy device: Case series.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Mendoza Ladd, Amer Alsamman, Karleen Meiklejohn, Omar Viramontes\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2427-2311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy via fine-needle biopsy/fine-needle aspiration (FNB/FNA) is currently the standard method to sample tumors in the mediastinum and abdomen. Although specimens obtained with these needles are acceptable, a histological diagnosis is not always possible. Recently, a new EUS-guided core needle biopsy (EUS-CNB) device became available. Herein, we describe the first experience with its use in a transmural fashion. <b>Patients and methods</b> This was a case series of patients who underwent EUS-CNB at an academic center. All patients provided written informed consent and were observed in the hospital ≥ 48 hours after the procedure. <b>Results</b> A total of 8 patients underwent EUSC-CNB: five in the pancreas, two in the retroperitoneum, and one in the mediastinum. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-CNB was 100% after one actuation. In four patients, same-session FNB and EUS-CNB were obtained from the same lesion with superior tissue sample in the latter. No adverse events were documented. <b>Conclusions</b> To our knowledge this is the first report on transmural use of EUS-CNB in gastroenterology. Our findings suggest that the device is effective and safe. Larger studies comparing it with FNA/FNB needles will be required to further assess performance and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"E1237-E1241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518627/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2427-2311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2427-2311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Initial experience with transmural use of a new endoscopic ultrasound electric core needle biopsy device: Case series.
Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy via fine-needle biopsy/fine-needle aspiration (FNB/FNA) is currently the standard method to sample tumors in the mediastinum and abdomen. Although specimens obtained with these needles are acceptable, a histological diagnosis is not always possible. Recently, a new EUS-guided core needle biopsy (EUS-CNB) device became available. Herein, we describe the first experience with its use in a transmural fashion. Patients and methods This was a case series of patients who underwent EUS-CNB at an academic center. All patients provided written informed consent and were observed in the hospital ≥ 48 hours after the procedure. Results A total of 8 patients underwent EUSC-CNB: five in the pancreas, two in the retroperitoneum, and one in the mediastinum. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-CNB was 100% after one actuation. In four patients, same-session FNB and EUS-CNB were obtained from the same lesion with superior tissue sample in the latter. No adverse events were documented. Conclusions To our knowledge this is the first report on transmural use of EUS-CNB in gastroenterology. Our findings suggest that the device is effective and safe. Larger studies comparing it with FNA/FNB needles will be required to further assess performance and safety.