新型内窥镜止血剂在控制和预防出血方面的疗效:前瞻性多中心全国登记结果。

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2406-7492
Roberta Maselli, Leonardo Da Rio, Mauro Manno, Paola Soriani, Gianluca Andrisani, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Carlo Fabbri, Monica Sbrancia, Cecilia Binda, Alba Panarese, Fulvio D'Abramo, Teresa Staiano, Stefano Rizza, Renato Cannizzaro, Stefania Maiero, Vittoria Stigliano, Germana de Nucci, Gianpiero Manes, Marco Sacco, Antonio Facciorusso, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Repici
{"title":"新型内窥镜止血剂在控制和预防出血方面的疗效:前瞻性多中心全国登记结果。","authors":"Roberta Maselli, Leonardo Da Rio, Mauro Manno, Paola Soriani, Gianluca Andrisani, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Carlo Fabbri, Monica Sbrancia, Cecilia Binda, Alba Panarese, Fulvio D'Abramo, Teresa Staiano, Stefano Rizza, Renato Cannizzaro, Stefania Maiero, Vittoria Stigliano, Germana de Nucci, Gianpiero Manes, Marco Sacco, Antonio Facciorusso, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Repici","doi":"10.1055/a-2406-7492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Topical hemostatic agents emerged as a new treatment modality for gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of PuraStat for control of active bleeding and for prevention of bleeding after different operative endoscopy procedures. <b>Patients and methods</b> A national, multicenter, observational registry was established to collect data from ten Italian centers from June 2021 to February 2023. Demographics, type of application (active gastrointestinal bleeding or prevention after endoscopic procedures, site, amount of gel used, completeness of coverage of the treated area), outcomes (rates of intraprocedural hemostasis and bleeding events during 30-day follow-up), and adverse events (AEs) were prospectively analyzed. <b>Results</b> Four hundred and one patients were treated for active gastrointestinal bleeding or as a preventive measure after different types of operative endoscopy procedures. Ninety-one treatments for active bleeding and 310 preventive applications were included. In 174 of 401 cases (43.4%), PuraStat was the primary treatment modality. Complete coverage was possible in 330 of 401 (82.3%) with difficulty in application in seven of 401 cases (1.7%). Hemostasis of active bleedings was achieved in 90 of 91 patients (98.9%). In 30-day follow-up 3.9% patients in whom PuraStat was used for prophylaxis had a bleeding event compared with 7.7% after hemostasis. No AEs related to the use of PuraStat were reported. <b>Conclusions</b> PuraStat is a safe and effective hemostat both for bleeding control and for bleeding prevention after different operative endoscopy procedures. Our results suggest that the possible applications for the use of PuraStat may be wider compared with current indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 10","pages":"E1220-E1229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of novel endoscopic hemostatic agent for bleeding control and prevention: Results from a prospective, multicenter national registry.\",\"authors\":\"Roberta Maselli, Leonardo Da Rio, Mauro Manno, Paola Soriani, Gianluca Andrisani, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Carlo Fabbri, Monica Sbrancia, Cecilia Binda, Alba Panarese, Fulvio D'Abramo, Teresa Staiano, Stefano Rizza, Renato Cannizzaro, Stefania Maiero, Vittoria Stigliano, Germana de Nucci, Gianpiero Manes, Marco Sacco, Antonio Facciorusso, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Repici\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2406-7492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Topical hemostatic agents emerged as a new treatment modality for gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of PuraStat for control of active bleeding and for prevention of bleeding after different operative endoscopy procedures. <b>Patients and methods</b> A national, multicenter, observational registry was established to collect data from ten Italian centers from June 2021 to February 2023. Demographics, type of application (active gastrointestinal bleeding or prevention after endoscopic procedures, site, amount of gel used, completeness of coverage of the treated area), outcomes (rates of intraprocedural hemostasis and bleeding events during 30-day follow-up), and adverse events (AEs) were prospectively analyzed. <b>Results</b> Four hundred and one patients were treated for active gastrointestinal bleeding or as a preventive measure after different types of operative endoscopy procedures. Ninety-one treatments for active bleeding and 310 preventive applications were included. In 174 of 401 cases (43.4%), PuraStat was the primary treatment modality. Complete coverage was possible in 330 of 401 (82.3%) with difficulty in application in seven of 401 cases (1.7%). Hemostasis of active bleedings was achieved in 90 of 91 patients (98.9%). In 30-day follow-up 3.9% patients in whom PuraStat was used for prophylaxis had a bleeding event compared with 7.7% after hemostasis. No AEs related to the use of PuraStat were reported. <b>Conclusions</b> PuraStat is a safe and effective hemostat both for bleeding control and for bleeding prevention after different operative endoscopy procedures. Our results suggest that the possible applications for the use of PuraStat may be wider compared with current indications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"E1220-E1229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518632/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2406-7492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2406-7492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的 局部止血剂是治疗消化道出血的一种新方法。本研究旨在评估 PuraStat 用于控制活动性出血和预防不同内镜手术后出血的安全性和有效性。患者和方法 从 2021 年 6 月到 2023 年 2 月,建立了一个全国性、多中心、观察性登记处,从 10 个意大利中心收集数据。前瞻性地分析了人口统计学、应用类型(内镜手术后活动性消化道出血或预防、部位、凝胶用量、治疗区域的覆盖完整性)、结果(30 天随访期间的术中止血率和出血事件发生率)以及不良事件(AEs)。结果 401 名患者因活动性消化道出血或作为不同类型手术内镜术后的预防措施接受了治疗。其中包括 91 次活动性出血治疗和 310 次预防性应用。在 401 个病例中的 174 个(43.4%),PuraStat 是主要的治疗方式。401 例中有 330 例(82.3%)可以完全覆盖,401 例中有 7 例(1.7%)应用困难。91 例患者中有 90 例(98.9%)实现了活动性出血止血。在 30 天的随访中,使用 PuraStat 进行预防的患者中有 3.9% 发生了出血事件,而止血后为 7.7%。没有与使用 PuraStat 相关的 AE 报告。结论 PuraStat 是一种安全有效的止血钳,可用于不同内窥镜手术后的出血控制和出血预防。我们的研究结果表明,与目前的适应症相比,PuraStat 的应用范围可能更广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of novel endoscopic hemostatic agent for bleeding control and prevention: Results from a prospective, multicenter national registry.

Background and study aims Topical hemostatic agents emerged as a new treatment modality for gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of PuraStat for control of active bleeding and for prevention of bleeding after different operative endoscopy procedures. Patients and methods A national, multicenter, observational registry was established to collect data from ten Italian centers from June 2021 to February 2023. Demographics, type of application (active gastrointestinal bleeding or prevention after endoscopic procedures, site, amount of gel used, completeness of coverage of the treated area), outcomes (rates of intraprocedural hemostasis and bleeding events during 30-day follow-up), and adverse events (AEs) were prospectively analyzed. Results Four hundred and one patients were treated for active gastrointestinal bleeding or as a preventive measure after different types of operative endoscopy procedures. Ninety-one treatments for active bleeding and 310 preventive applications were included. In 174 of 401 cases (43.4%), PuraStat was the primary treatment modality. Complete coverage was possible in 330 of 401 (82.3%) with difficulty in application in seven of 401 cases (1.7%). Hemostasis of active bleedings was achieved in 90 of 91 patients (98.9%). In 30-day follow-up 3.9% patients in whom PuraStat was used for prophylaxis had a bleeding event compared with 7.7% after hemostasis. No AEs related to the use of PuraStat were reported. Conclusions PuraStat is a safe and effective hemostat both for bleeding control and for bleeding prevention after different operative endoscopy procedures. Our results suggest that the possible applications for the use of PuraStat may be wider compared with current indications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信