Rayzel Shulman, Ian Zenlea, Noah Ivers, Peter C Austin, Ping Li, Cheril Clarson, Alanna Landry, Jennifer Harrington, Geetha Mukerji, Mark R Palmert, Janet Parsons, Zubin Punthakee, Baiju R Shah
{"title":"一项以审计和反馈为基础的干预措施,旨在改善转入成人 1 型糖尿病护理后一年内的糖尿病管理:多中心准实验研究。","authors":"Rayzel Shulman, Ian Zenlea, Noah Ivers, Peter C Austin, Ping Li, Cheril Clarson, Alanna Landry, Jennifer Harrington, Geetha Mukerji, Mark R Palmert, Janet Parsons, Zubin Punthakee, Baiju R Shah","doi":"10.1111/dme.15444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To test whether an audit and feedback-based intervention improved HbA1c 12 months after transfer to type 1 diabetes adult care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-centre, quasi-experimental pre-post study of an AF-based intervention targeting paediatric diabetes teams, which encouraged the implementation of an evidence-informed structured transition process at five paediatric diabetes centres in Ontario, Canada. Participants entered the study at their final paediatric visit. A parallel control cohort was ascertained using population-based administrative datasets. The primary outcome was HbA1c 12 months after transfer. The main exposure was the study period: pre-implementation (June 2018-May 2019); early-implementation (June 2019-September 2020); and late-implementation (October 2020-September 2021). Multivariable linear regression models were fit separately in each cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 449 and 2844 individuals in the intervention and control cohorts, respectively. Twelve months after transfer, participants in the late-implementation intervention cohort had an HbA1c that was, on average, 0.41% lower than participants in the pre-implementation period (p = 0.016). Among the control cohort, there was no significant difference in the HbA1c 12 months after transfer between study periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found an effect of the intervention on glycaemic management one year following transfer to adult care. Future work will focus on refining and testing the effectiveness of the intervention in an expanded number of study sites and in collaboration with adult diabetes care providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An audit and feedback-based intervention to improve diabetes management in the year after transfer to adult type 1 diabetes care: A multi-center quasi-experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Rayzel Shulman, Ian Zenlea, Noah Ivers, Peter C Austin, Ping Li, Cheril Clarson, Alanna Landry, Jennifer Harrington, Geetha Mukerji, Mark R Palmert, Janet Parsons, Zubin Punthakee, Baiju R Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dme.15444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To test whether an audit and feedback-based intervention improved HbA1c 12 months after transfer to type 1 diabetes adult care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-centre, quasi-experimental pre-post study of an AF-based intervention targeting paediatric diabetes teams, which encouraged the implementation of an evidence-informed structured transition process at five paediatric diabetes centres in Ontario, Canada. Participants entered the study at their final paediatric visit. A parallel control cohort was ascertained using population-based administrative datasets. The primary outcome was HbA1c 12 months after transfer. The main exposure was the study period: pre-implementation (June 2018-May 2019); early-implementation (June 2019-September 2020); and late-implementation (October 2020-September 2021). Multivariable linear regression models were fit separately in each cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 449 and 2844 individuals in the intervention and control cohorts, respectively. Twelve months after transfer, participants in the late-implementation intervention cohort had an HbA1c that was, on average, 0.41% lower than participants in the pre-implementation period (p = 0.016). Among the control cohort, there was no significant difference in the HbA1c 12 months after transfer between study periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found an effect of the intervention on glycaemic management one year following transfer to adult care. Future work will focus on refining and testing the effectiveness of the intervention in an expanded number of study sites and in collaboration with adult diabetes care providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.15444\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.15444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
An audit and feedback-based intervention to improve diabetes management in the year after transfer to adult type 1 diabetes care: A multi-center quasi-experimental study.
Aim: To test whether an audit and feedback-based intervention improved HbA1c 12 months after transfer to type 1 diabetes adult care.
Methods: Multi-centre, quasi-experimental pre-post study of an AF-based intervention targeting paediatric diabetes teams, which encouraged the implementation of an evidence-informed structured transition process at five paediatric diabetes centres in Ontario, Canada. Participants entered the study at their final paediatric visit. A parallel control cohort was ascertained using population-based administrative datasets. The primary outcome was HbA1c 12 months after transfer. The main exposure was the study period: pre-implementation (June 2018-May 2019); early-implementation (June 2019-September 2020); and late-implementation (October 2020-September 2021). Multivariable linear regression models were fit separately in each cohort.
Results: There were 449 and 2844 individuals in the intervention and control cohorts, respectively. Twelve months after transfer, participants in the late-implementation intervention cohort had an HbA1c that was, on average, 0.41% lower than participants in the pre-implementation period (p = 0.016). Among the control cohort, there was no significant difference in the HbA1c 12 months after transfer between study periods.
Conclusions: We found an effect of the intervention on glycaemic management one year following transfer to adult care. Future work will focus on refining and testing the effectiveness of the intervention in an expanded number of study sites and in collaboration with adult diabetes care providers.
期刊介绍:
Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions.
The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed.
We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services.
Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”