乳腺癌患者化疗所致中性粒细胞减少症和发热性中性粒细胞减少症的预防性治疗:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2024.2423736
Yu-Fei Zhang, Rou-Mei Zhang, Wen-Xin Gu, Yi-Ting Jin, Chun-Lai Ma
{"title":"乳腺癌患者化疗所致中性粒细胞减少症和发热性中性粒细胞减少症的预防性治疗:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Yu-Fei Zhang, Rou-Mei Zhang, Wen-Xin Gu, Yi-Ting Jin, Chun-Lai Ma","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2423736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Polyethylene glycol recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (PEG-rhG-CSFs) are used to prevent or treat chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of same-day versus next-day PEG-rhG-CSF administration following chemotherapy and the effects of 3 mg versus 6 mg dosages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed cohort data of patients with breast cancer who underwent chemotherapy and received PEG-rhG-CSF either within 24 h (same-day group) or 24 h (next-day group) after chemotherapy. The incidences of CIN and FN were assessed in each chemotherapy cycle between the two groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of FN in the first cycle and throughout all cycles. The secondary endpoints included the incidences of various grades of CIN (CIN1-CIN4), antibiotic use, chemotherapy regimen modifications, and overall safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2385 chemotherapy cycles with prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF in 620 patients, 798 and 1587 cycleswere in the same-day and next-day group, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of FN in the first cycle or across all cycles, CIN1-4, or adverse reactions between the two groups. However, the same-day group exhibited significantly higher rates of antibiotic use (2.88% vs. 0.42%, <i>p</i> = .03) and chemotherapy regimen modification (4.68% vs. 1.45%, <i>p</i> < .001). Subgroup analysis indicated no differences in outcomes for the 6 mg dosage, but a significantly lower incidence of CIN was observed in the same-day group receiving 3 mg (<i>p</i> = .025).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that same-day administration of PEG-rhG-CSF is as effective and safe as next-day administration in preventing FN and CIN during chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"2147-2154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of same-day versus next-day administration of PEG-rhG-CSF for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Fei Zhang, Rou-Mei Zhang, Wen-Xin Gu, Yi-Ting Jin, Chun-Lai Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03007995.2024.2423736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Polyethylene glycol recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (PEG-rhG-CSFs) are used to prevent or treat chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of same-day versus next-day PEG-rhG-CSF administration following chemotherapy and the effects of 3 mg versus 6 mg dosages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed cohort data of patients with breast cancer who underwent chemotherapy and received PEG-rhG-CSF either within 24 h (same-day group) or 24 h (next-day group) after chemotherapy. The incidences of CIN and FN were assessed in each chemotherapy cycle between the two groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of FN in the first cycle and throughout all cycles. The secondary endpoints included the incidences of various grades of CIN (CIN1-CIN4), antibiotic use, chemotherapy regimen modifications, and overall safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2385 chemotherapy cycles with prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF in 620 patients, 798 and 1587 cycleswere in the same-day and next-day group, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of FN in the first cycle or across all cycles, CIN1-4, or adverse reactions between the two groups. However, the same-day group exhibited significantly higher rates of antibiotic use (2.88% vs. 0.42%, <i>p</i> = .03) and chemotherapy regimen modification (4.68% vs. 1.45%, <i>p</i> < .001). Subgroup analysis indicated no differences in outcomes for the 6 mg dosage, but a significantly lower incidence of CIN was observed in the same-day group receiving 3 mg (<i>p</i> = .025).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that same-day administration of PEG-rhG-CSF is as effective and safe as next-day administration in preventing FN and CIN during chemotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2147-2154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2423736\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2423736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:聚乙二醇重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF聚乙二醇重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)用于预防或治疗化疗诱发的中性粒细胞减少症(CIN)和发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)。本研究旨在比较化疗后当天服用 PEG-rhG-CSF 与隔天服用 PEG-rhG-CSF 的疗效和安全性,以及 3 毫克剂量与 6 毫克剂量的效果:我们对接受化疗的乳腺癌患者的队列数据进行了回顾性分析,这些患者在化疗后 24 小时内(当日组)或 24 小时内(次日组)接受了 PEG-rhG-CSF。评估了两组患者在每个化疗周期的 CIN 和 FN 发生率。主要终点是第一周期和所有周期的 FN 发生率。次要终点包括不同等级CIN(CIN1-CIN4)的发生率、抗生素的使用、化疗方案的调整以及总体安全性:在620名患者的2385个预防性PEG-rhG-CSF化疗周期中,当天组和次日组分别有798个和1587个周期。在第一个周期或所有周期的 FN 发生率、CIN1-4 或不良反应方面,两组间未观察到有统计学意义的差异。然而,当天组的抗生素使用率(2.88% 对 0.42%,P = 0.03)和化疗方案调整率(4.68% 对 1.45%,P = 0.025)明显更高:这些研究结果表明,在化疗期间预防 FN 和 CIN 方面,PEG-rhG-CSF 当天给药与隔天给药同样有效、安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of same-day versus next-day administration of PEG-rhG-CSF for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: Polyethylene glycol recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (PEG-rhG-CSFs) are used to prevent or treat chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of same-day versus next-day PEG-rhG-CSF administration following chemotherapy and the effects of 3 mg versus 6 mg dosages.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed cohort data of patients with breast cancer who underwent chemotherapy and received PEG-rhG-CSF either within 24 h (same-day group) or 24 h (next-day group) after chemotherapy. The incidences of CIN and FN were assessed in each chemotherapy cycle between the two groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of FN in the first cycle and throughout all cycles. The secondary endpoints included the incidences of various grades of CIN (CIN1-CIN4), antibiotic use, chemotherapy regimen modifications, and overall safety.

Results: Among the 2385 chemotherapy cycles with prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF in 620 patients, 798 and 1587 cycleswere in the same-day and next-day group, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of FN in the first cycle or across all cycles, CIN1-4, or adverse reactions between the two groups. However, the same-day group exhibited significantly higher rates of antibiotic use (2.88% vs. 0.42%, p = .03) and chemotherapy regimen modification (4.68% vs. 1.45%, p < .001). Subgroup analysis indicated no differences in outcomes for the 6 mg dosage, but a significantly lower incidence of CIN was observed in the same-day group receiving 3 mg (p = .025).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that same-day administration of PEG-rhG-CSF is as effective and safe as next-day administration in preventing FN and CIN during chemotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信