短期插管与长期插管对言语和吞咽的影响比较。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
John R Bach, Anthariksh Nair
{"title":"短期插管与长期插管对言语和吞咽的影响比较。","authors":"John R Bach, Anthariksh Nair","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intubated, ventilator unweanable patients with ventilatory pump failure can be extubated to continuous noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support; however, delays may result in untoward effects on speech and swallowing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective chart review of ventilatory pump failure patients to determine need for postextubation gastrostomy tubes and consequences on speech for intubations less than (short) versus greater than (long) 3 wks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-five patients were intubated for a mean 20.7 ± 23.5 (range = 1-240) days. All recovered prehospitalization speech status within 2 hrs to 3 days. One hundred four of the short group were intubated 1.6 ± 1.3 (range = 1-9) times for 9.9 ± 5.1 (range = 1-20) days versus 61 of the long group intubated 2.4 ± 3.3 (range = 1-26) times for 39.0 ± 30.5 (range = 21-210) days, 10.6% vs. 8.2%, respectively, required postextubation gastrostomy tubes indefinitely.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There was no difference in untoward effects on speech or swallowing from short- versus long-term intubation. Had the patients undergone tracheotomies, the majority would have had gastrostomy tubes placed permanently and suffer morbidity and mortality from the tubes. Thus, an option is to permit patients to remain intubated and, even if unweanable, extubate them to continuous noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support rather than tracheotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"127-129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Consequences of Short- Versus Long-Term Intubation on Speech and Swallowing.\",\"authors\":\"John R Bach, Anthariksh Nair\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intubated, ventilator unweanable patients with ventilatory pump failure can be extubated to continuous noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support; however, delays may result in untoward effects on speech and swallowing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective chart review of ventilatory pump failure patients to determine need for postextubation gastrostomy tubes and consequences on speech for intubations less than (short) versus greater than (long) 3 wks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-five patients were intubated for a mean 20.7 ± 23.5 (range = 1-240) days. All recovered prehospitalization speech status within 2 hrs to 3 days. One hundred four of the short group were intubated 1.6 ± 1.3 (range = 1-9) times for 9.9 ± 5.1 (range = 1-20) days versus 61 of the long group intubated 2.4 ± 3.3 (range = 1-26) times for 39.0 ± 30.5 (range = 21-210) days, 10.6% vs. 8.2%, respectively, required postextubation gastrostomy tubes indefinitely.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There was no difference in untoward effects on speech or swallowing from short- versus long-term intubation. Had the patients undergone tracheotomies, the majority would have had gastrostomy tubes placed permanently and suffer morbidity and mortality from the tubes. Thus, an option is to permit patients to remain intubated and, even if unweanable, extubate them to continuous noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support rather than tracheotomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"127-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002317\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:导言:插管、无法断开呼吸机的通气泵衰竭(VPF)患者可以拔管至持续无创正压通气支持(CNVS),但是,延迟拔管可能会对语言和吞咽造成不良影响:方法:对 VPF 患者进行回顾性病历审查,以确定拔管后是否需要胃造瘘管 (GT),以及插管时间少于(短)三周和多于(长)三周对言语的影响:165 名患者的插管时间平均为 20.7 ± 23.5 天(范围 = 1 至 240 天)。所有患者均在两小时至三天内恢复了入院前的语言状态。短插管组 104 名患者插管 1.6 ± 1.3(范围 = 1 到 9)次,时间为 9.9 ± 5.1(范围 = 1 到 20)天;长插管组 61 名患者插管 2.4 ± 3.3(范围 = 1 到 26)次,时间为 39.0 ± 30.5(范围 = 21 到 210)天。10.6%与8.2%的患者在拔管后需要无限期地进行GT:讨论:短期插管与长期插管对言语或吞咽的不良影响没有差异。如果患者接受了气管切开术,大多数人都会被永久置入气管插管,并因气管插管而发病和死亡。因此,一种选择是允许患者继续插管,即使无法断奶,也要拔管至 CNVS,而不是气管切开术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Consequences of Short- Versus Long-Term Intubation on Speech and Swallowing.

Introduction: Intubated, ventilator unweanable patients with ventilatory pump failure can be extubated to continuous noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support; however, delays may result in untoward effects on speech and swallowing.

Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of ventilatory pump failure patients to determine need for postextubation gastrostomy tubes and consequences on speech for intubations less than (short) versus greater than (long) 3 wks.

Results: One hundred sixty-five patients were intubated for a mean 20.7 ± 23.5 (range = 1-240) days. All recovered prehospitalization speech status within 2 hrs to 3 days. One hundred four of the short group were intubated 1.6 ± 1.3 (range = 1-9) times for 9.9 ± 5.1 (range = 1-20) days versus 61 of the long group intubated 2.4 ± 3.3 (range = 1-26) times for 39.0 ± 30.5 (range = 21-210) days, 10.6% vs. 8.2%, respectively, required postextubation gastrostomy tubes indefinitely.

Discussion: There was no difference in untoward effects on speech or swallowing from short- versus long-term intubation. Had the patients undergone tracheotomies, the majority would have had gastrostomy tubes placed permanently and suffer morbidity and mortality from the tubes. Thus, an option is to permit patients to remain intubated and, even if unweanable, extubate them to continuous noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support rather than tracheotomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信