John Joseph, Vladimir Sudimac, Sabine Mersmann, Martina Kerscher
{"title":"治疗上面部细纹的 IncobotulinumtoxinA:两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 III 期研究结果。","authors":"John Joseph, Vladimir Sudimac, Sabine Mersmann, Martina Kerscher","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III studies of incobotulinumtoxinA for treating upper facial lines (UFL; combination of glabellar frown lines [GFL], horizontal forehead lines [HFL] and lateral canthal lines [LCL]) were conducted in the US (ULTRA I: NCT04594213) and Germany (ULTRA II: NCT04622254).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate safety and efficacy of simultaneous intramuscular injections for UFL. Longer-term safety and efficacy were assessed in open-label extension periods (OLEX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy participants (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe GFL, HFL and symmetrical LCL at maximum contraction on the five-point Merz Aesthetics Scales (MAS) were randomized 2:1:1 to receive up to 64 Units of incobotulinumtoxinA in the main period (MP) for each trial. Treatment groups were: UFL, GFL & HFL (ULTRA I), LCL (ULTRA II) and placebo. Primary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of GFL, HFL and LCL responders, defined as a MAS score for the respective area of 0 (no) or 1 (mild) and ≥2-grade improvement from baseline to Day 30, as assessed by both investigator and participant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 362 and 368 participants received treatment in ULTRA I and ULTRA II, respectively. In both studies, incobotulinumtoxinA treatment was significantly more effective than placebo with respect to the primary endpoint (p < 0.0001) and key secondary endpoints (p < 0.0001). OLEX results were consistent with those seen in the MP. No new safety findings were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ULTRA I and ULTRA II, safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA for the simultaneous treatment of moderate-to-severe UFL were demonstrated, with significant improvements across all primary and secondary endpoints versus placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines: Results From Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Studies.\",\"authors\":\"John Joseph, Vladimir Sudimac, Sabine Mersmann, Martina Kerscher\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjae222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III studies of incobotulinumtoxinA for treating upper facial lines (UFL; combination of glabellar frown lines [GFL], horizontal forehead lines [HFL] and lateral canthal lines [LCL]) were conducted in the US (ULTRA I: NCT04594213) and Germany (ULTRA II: NCT04622254).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate safety and efficacy of simultaneous intramuscular injections for UFL. Longer-term safety and efficacy were assessed in open-label extension periods (OLEX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy participants (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe GFL, HFL and symmetrical LCL at maximum contraction on the five-point Merz Aesthetics Scales (MAS) were randomized 2:1:1 to receive up to 64 Units of incobotulinumtoxinA in the main period (MP) for each trial. Treatment groups were: UFL, GFL & HFL (ULTRA I), LCL (ULTRA II) and placebo. Primary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of GFL, HFL and LCL responders, defined as a MAS score for the respective area of 0 (no) or 1 (mild) and ≥2-grade improvement from baseline to Day 30, as assessed by both investigator and participant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 362 and 368 participants received treatment in ULTRA I and ULTRA II, respectively. In both studies, incobotulinumtoxinA treatment was significantly more effective than placebo with respect to the primary endpoint (p < 0.0001) and key secondary endpoints (p < 0.0001). OLEX results were consistent with those seen in the MP. No new safety findings were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ULTRA I and ULTRA II, safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA for the simultaneous treatment of moderate-to-severe UFL were demonstrated, with significant improvements across all primary and secondary endpoints versus placebo.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae222\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究背景在美国(ULTRA I:NCT04594213)和德国(ULTRA II:NCT04622254)进行了两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的incobotulinumtoxinA治疗上面部细纹(UFL;眉间纹[GFL]、额横纹[HFL]和眼外侧纹[LCL]的组合)的III期研究:评估同时肌肉注射治疗 UFL 的安全性和有效性。方法:按照默茨美学五点量表(MAS),中重度GFL、HFL和对称性LCL处于最大收缩状态的健康参与者(≥18岁)按2:1:1随机分配,在每个试验的主要阶段(MP)接受最多64单位的incobotulinumtoxinA。治疗组为UFL、GFL 和 HFL(ULTRA I)、LCL(ULTRA II)和安慰剂。主要疗效终点是GFL、HFL和LCL应答者的比例,即由研究者和参与者共同评估,各区域的MAS评分为0(无)或1(轻度),且从基线到第30天的改善程度≥2级:在 ULTRA I 和 ULTRA II 中,分别有 362 名和 368 名参与者接受了治疗。在这两项研究中,就主要终点(p < 0.0001)和关键次要终点(p < 0.0001)而言,incobotulinumtoxinA治疗的效果明显优于安慰剂。OLEX 的结果与 MP 的结果一致。未发现新的安全性结果:在 ULTRA I 和 ULTRA II 中,incobotulinumtoxinA 同时治疗中度至重度 UFL 的安全性和有效性得到了证实,与安慰剂相比,所有主要和次要终点均有显著改善。
IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines: Results From Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Studies.
Background: Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III studies of incobotulinumtoxinA for treating upper facial lines (UFL; combination of glabellar frown lines [GFL], horizontal forehead lines [HFL] and lateral canthal lines [LCL]) were conducted in the US (ULTRA I: NCT04594213) and Germany (ULTRA II: NCT04622254).
Objectives: To evaluate safety and efficacy of simultaneous intramuscular injections for UFL. Longer-term safety and efficacy were assessed in open-label extension periods (OLEX).
Methods: Healthy participants (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe GFL, HFL and symmetrical LCL at maximum contraction on the five-point Merz Aesthetics Scales (MAS) were randomized 2:1:1 to receive up to 64 Units of incobotulinumtoxinA in the main period (MP) for each trial. Treatment groups were: UFL, GFL & HFL (ULTRA I), LCL (ULTRA II) and placebo. Primary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of GFL, HFL and LCL responders, defined as a MAS score for the respective area of 0 (no) or 1 (mild) and ≥2-grade improvement from baseline to Day 30, as assessed by both investigator and participant.
Results: Overall, 362 and 368 participants received treatment in ULTRA I and ULTRA II, respectively. In both studies, incobotulinumtoxinA treatment was significantly more effective than placebo with respect to the primary endpoint (p < 0.0001) and key secondary endpoints (p < 0.0001). OLEX results were consistent with those seen in the MP. No new safety findings were identified.
Conclusions: In ULTRA I and ULTRA II, safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA for the simultaneous treatment of moderate-to-severe UFL were demonstrated, with significant improvements across all primary and secondary endpoints versus placebo.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.