ChatGPT 是治疗自身免疫性肝炎的可靠工具吗?

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Francesca Colapietro, Daniele Piovani, Nicola Pugliese, Alessio Aghemo, Vincenzo Ronca, Ana Lleo
{"title":"ChatGPT 是治疗自身免疫性肝炎的可靠工具吗?","authors":"Francesca Colapietro, Daniele Piovani, Nicola Pugliese, Alessio Aghemo, Vincenzo Ronca, Ana Lleo","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Artificial intelligence-based chatbots offer a potential avenue for delivering personalized counselling to Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) patients. We assessed accuracy, completeness, comprehensiveness and safety of ChatGPT-4 responses to 12 inquiries out of a pool of 40 questions posed by four AIH patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questions were categorized into three areas: Diagnosis(1-3), Quality of Life(4-8) and Medical treatment(9-12). 11 Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) evaluated responses using a Likert scale with 6 points for accuracy, 5 points for safety and 3 points for completeness and comprehensiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median scores for accuracy, completeness, comprehensiveness and safety were 5(4-6), 2 (2-2) and 3 (2-3); no domain exhibited superior evaluation. Post-diagnosis follow-up question was the trickiest with low accuracy and completeness but safe and comprehensive features. Agreement among KOLs (Fleiss's Kappa statistics) was slight for accuracy (0.05) but poor for the remaining features (-0.05, -0.06 and -0,02, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chatbots show good comprehensibility but lack reliability. Further studies are needed to integrate Chat-GPT within clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is ChatGPT a reliable tool in Autoimmune Hepatitis?\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Colapietro, Daniele Piovani, Nicola Pugliese, Alessio Aghemo, Vincenzo Ronca, Ana Lleo\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Artificial intelligence-based chatbots offer a potential avenue for delivering personalized counselling to Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) patients. We assessed accuracy, completeness, comprehensiveness and safety of ChatGPT-4 responses to 12 inquiries out of a pool of 40 questions posed by four AIH patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questions were categorized into three areas: Diagnosis(1-3), Quality of Life(4-8) and Medical treatment(9-12). 11 Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) evaluated responses using a Likert scale with 6 points for accuracy, 5 points for safety and 3 points for completeness and comprehensiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median scores for accuracy, completeness, comprehensiveness and safety were 5(4-6), 2 (2-2) and 3 (2-3); no domain exhibited superior evaluation. Post-diagnosis follow-up question was the trickiest with low accuracy and completeness but safe and comprehensive features. Agreement among KOLs (Fleiss's Kappa statistics) was slight for accuracy (0.05) but poor for the remaining features (-0.05, -0.06 and -0,02, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chatbots show good comprehensibility but lack reliability. Further studies are needed to integrate Chat-GPT within clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003179\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003179","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:基于人工智能的聊天机器人为向自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)患者提供个性化咨询提供了一条潜在的途径。我们评估了 ChatGPT-4 对四名 AIH 患者提出的 40 个问题中的 12 个问题所做回复的准确性、完整性、全面性和安全性:问题分为三个方面:诊断(1-3)、生活质量(4-8)和医疗(9-12)。11 位关键意见领袖 (KOL) 采用李克特量表对回答进行评估,准确性得 6 分,安全性得 5 分,完整性和全面性得 3 分:准确性、完整性、全面性和安全性的中位数分别为 5 分(4-6 分)、2 分(2-2 分)和 3 分(2-3 分);没有任何一个领域的评估结果更优。诊断后随访问题最棘手,准确性和完整性较低,但具有安全和全面的特点。KOL之间的一致性(Fleiss's Kappa统计)在准确性方面略有差异(0.05),但在其余特征方面则较差(分别为-0.05、-0.06和-0.02):聊天机器人显示出良好的可理解性,但缺乏可靠性。结论:聊天机器人显示出良好的可理解性,但缺乏可靠性,需要进一步研究将聊天-GPT融入临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is ChatGPT a reliable tool in Autoimmune Hepatitis?

Background and aims: Artificial intelligence-based chatbots offer a potential avenue for delivering personalized counselling to Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) patients. We assessed accuracy, completeness, comprehensiveness and safety of ChatGPT-4 responses to 12 inquiries out of a pool of 40 questions posed by four AIH patients.

Methods: Questions were categorized into three areas: Diagnosis(1-3), Quality of Life(4-8) and Medical treatment(9-12). 11 Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) evaluated responses using a Likert scale with 6 points for accuracy, 5 points for safety and 3 points for completeness and comprehensiveness.

Results: Median scores for accuracy, completeness, comprehensiveness and safety were 5(4-6), 2 (2-2) and 3 (2-3); no domain exhibited superior evaluation. Post-diagnosis follow-up question was the trickiest with low accuracy and completeness but safe and comprehensive features. Agreement among KOLs (Fleiss's Kappa statistics) was slight for accuracy (0.05) but poor for the remaining features (-0.05, -0.06 and -0,02, respectively).

Conclusions: Chatbots show good comprehensibility but lack reliability. Further studies are needed to integrate Chat-GPT within clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信