减弱型和典型家族性腺瘤性息肉病的癌症风险:全国性队列与匹配的非暴露个体:家族性腺瘤性息肉病(AFAP)和家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)患者的癌症和手术。

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Søren Hammershøj Beck, John Gásdal Karstensen, Steffen Bülow, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Thomas van Overeem Hansen, Helle Højen, Niels Jespersen, Tine Plato Kuhlmann, Hans Christian Pommergaard, Mads Damgaard Wewer, Laus Wullum, Anne Marie Jelsig, Johan Burisch
{"title":"减弱型和典型家族性腺瘤性息肉病的癌症风险:全国性队列与匹配的非暴露个体:家族性腺瘤性息肉病(AFAP)和家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)患者的癌症和手术。","authors":"Søren Hammershøj Beck, John Gásdal Karstensen, Steffen Bülow, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Thomas van Overeem Hansen, Helle Højen, Niels Jespersen, Tine Plato Kuhlmann, Hans Christian Pommergaard, Mads Damgaard Wewer, Laus Wullum, Anne Marie Jelsig, Johan Burisch","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by pathogenic variants in the APC gene. FAP is usually categorized according to phenotype: classical FAP (CFAP) and attenuated FAP (AFAP); the latter is considered to have a milder disease course. We aimed to assess the risk of overall and specific cancers in CFAP and AFAP patients compared to matched, non-exposed individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All known Danish FAP patients were classified as either CFAP or AFAP and assigned four matched, non-exposed individuals. The risk of overall and specific cancers, and mortality were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 311 CFAP patients, 134 AFAP patients, and 1,600 non-exposed individuals. The overall cancer risk was significantly higher for both CFAP and AFAP patients than for non-exposed individuals, with hazard ratios (HR) of 4.77 (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.61-6.32; P<0.001) for CFAP and 3.22 (95% CI, 2.16-4.80; P<0.001) for AFAP. No significant difference was observed when comparing CFAP and AFAP (HR=1.48; 95% CI, 0.98-2.25; P=0.0646). The HR of colonic cancer was 2.16 (95% CI, 0.99-7.72; P=0.0522) and 2.72 (95% CI, 1.19-6.22; P=0.0177 for CFAP and AFAP), respectively compared to non-exposed and did not differ between CFAP and AFAP patients (HR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.32-2.00; P=0.6278). Mortality was significantly higher in CFAP (HR=2.96; 95% CI, 2.04-4.28; P<0.001), but not in AFAP (HR=1.40; 95% CI, 0.73-2.69; P=0.311).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nationwide data reveal differing risk profiles for specific cancers and mortality in AFAP and CFAP compared to non-exposed individuals. The cancer burden of AFAP necessitates consistent monitoring of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cancer Risks in Attenuated and Classical Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Nationwide Cohort with Matched, Non-Exposed Individuals: Cancer and surgery in AFAP and FAP patients.\",\"authors\":\"Søren Hammershøj Beck, John Gásdal Karstensen, Steffen Bülow, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Thomas van Overeem Hansen, Helle Højen, Niels Jespersen, Tine Plato Kuhlmann, Hans Christian Pommergaard, Mads Damgaard Wewer, Laus Wullum, Anne Marie Jelsig, Johan Burisch\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by pathogenic variants in the APC gene. FAP is usually categorized according to phenotype: classical FAP (CFAP) and attenuated FAP (AFAP); the latter is considered to have a milder disease course. We aimed to assess the risk of overall and specific cancers in CFAP and AFAP patients compared to matched, non-exposed individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All known Danish FAP patients were classified as either CFAP or AFAP and assigned four matched, non-exposed individuals. The risk of overall and specific cancers, and mortality were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 311 CFAP patients, 134 AFAP patients, and 1,600 non-exposed individuals. The overall cancer risk was significantly higher for both CFAP and AFAP patients than for non-exposed individuals, with hazard ratios (HR) of 4.77 (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.61-6.32; P<0.001) for CFAP and 3.22 (95% CI, 2.16-4.80; P<0.001) for AFAP. No significant difference was observed when comparing CFAP and AFAP (HR=1.48; 95% CI, 0.98-2.25; P=0.0646). The HR of colonic cancer was 2.16 (95% CI, 0.99-7.72; P=0.0522) and 2.72 (95% CI, 1.19-6.22; P=0.0177 for CFAP and AFAP), respectively compared to non-exposed and did not differ between CFAP and AFAP patients (HR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.32-2.00; P=0.6278). Mortality was significantly higher in CFAP (HR=2.96; 95% CI, 2.04-4.28; P<0.001), but not in AFAP (HR=1.40; 95% CI, 0.73-2.69; P=0.311).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nationwide data reveal differing risk profiles for specific cancers and mortality in AFAP and CFAP compared to non-exposed individuals. The cancer burden of AFAP necessitates consistent monitoring of these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003167\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003167","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)是由 APC 基因的致病变异引起的。家族性腺瘤性息肉病通常根据表型进行分类:典型家族性腺瘤性息肉病(CFAP)和减弱家族性腺瘤性息肉病(AFAP);后者被认为病程较轻。我们的目的是评估 CFAP 和 AFAP 患者与匹配的非暴露个体相比罹患总体癌症和特定癌症的风险:所有已知的丹麦 FAP 患者均被归类为 CFAP 或 AFAP,并分配给四个匹配的非暴露个体。结果:分析包括 311 名 CFAP 患者和 4 名 AFAP 患者:分析对象包括 311 名 CFAP 患者、134 名 AFAP 患者和 1,600 名非接触者。CFAP和AFAP患者的总体癌症风险均明显高于非暴露人群,危险比(HR)为4.77(95%置信区间(CI),3.61-6.32;PC结论:全国范围内的数据显示,与未接触人群相比,亚洲及太平洋地区和非洲裔美国人患特定癌症和死亡的风险情况有所不同。亚太裔美国人的癌症负担要求对这些患者进行持续监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cancer Risks in Attenuated and Classical Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Nationwide Cohort with Matched, Non-Exposed Individuals: Cancer and surgery in AFAP and FAP patients.

Introduction: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by pathogenic variants in the APC gene. FAP is usually categorized according to phenotype: classical FAP (CFAP) and attenuated FAP (AFAP); the latter is considered to have a milder disease course. We aimed to assess the risk of overall and specific cancers in CFAP and AFAP patients compared to matched, non-exposed individuals.

Methods: All known Danish FAP patients were classified as either CFAP or AFAP and assigned four matched, non-exposed individuals. The risk of overall and specific cancers, and mortality were analyzed.

Results: The analysis included 311 CFAP patients, 134 AFAP patients, and 1,600 non-exposed individuals. The overall cancer risk was significantly higher for both CFAP and AFAP patients than for non-exposed individuals, with hazard ratios (HR) of 4.77 (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.61-6.32; P<0.001) for CFAP and 3.22 (95% CI, 2.16-4.80; P<0.001) for AFAP. No significant difference was observed when comparing CFAP and AFAP (HR=1.48; 95% CI, 0.98-2.25; P=0.0646). The HR of colonic cancer was 2.16 (95% CI, 0.99-7.72; P=0.0522) and 2.72 (95% CI, 1.19-6.22; P=0.0177 for CFAP and AFAP), respectively compared to non-exposed and did not differ between CFAP and AFAP patients (HR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.32-2.00; P=0.6278). Mortality was significantly higher in CFAP (HR=2.96; 95% CI, 2.04-4.28; P<0.001), but not in AFAP (HR=1.40; 95% CI, 0.73-2.69; P=0.311).

Conclusion: Nationwide data reveal differing risk profiles for specific cancers and mortality in AFAP and CFAP compared to non-exposed individuals. The cancer burden of AFAP necessitates consistent monitoring of these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信