作为卵巢癌种族生存差异中介因素的医疗服务领域和治疗:SEER-Medicare 的结构方程模型分析。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Clare Meernik, Quan Chen, Lauren E Wilson, Ashwini Joshi, Fariha Rahman, Maria Pisu, Margaret Liang, Kevin C Ward, Margaret Gates Kuliszewski, Thomas Tucker, Andrew Berchuck, Bin Huang, Tomi Akinyemiju
{"title":"作为卵巢癌种族生存差异中介因素的医疗服务领域和治疗:SEER-Medicare 的结构方程模型分析。","authors":"Clare Meernik, Quan Chen, Lauren E Wilson, Ashwini Joshi, Fariha Rahman, Maria Pisu, Margaret Liang, Kevin C Ward, Margaret Gates Kuliszewski, Thomas Tucker, Andrew Berchuck, Bin Huang, Tomi Akinyemiju","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Racial differences in health care access (HCA) may contribute to disparities in ovarian cancer (OC) survival. We used structural equation models (SEMs) to examine associations between race and HCA domains (affordability, availability, accessibility) in relation to overall and OC-specific mortality. Non-Hispanic (NH)-Black and non-Black (Hispanic, NH-White) women diagnosed with OC in 2008-2015 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to conduct mediation analysis for associations between race and HCA domains with overall and OC-specific mortality. SEM models adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. A total of 4629 eligible patients with OC were identified, including 255 (5.5%) patients who were NH-Black. In SEM adjusting for demographic, clinical, and HCA latent variables, there was a total effect of NH-Black race on overall (HR, 1.11, 95% CI, 1.03-1.19) and OC-specific mortality (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08, 1.24), which was primarily driven by a direct effect. There was a modest indirect association between NH-Black race and mortality through decreased treatment receipt, though not through HCA. There is a need for studies investigating additional social and biological mechanisms that contribute to worse cancer survival among NH-Black patients. This article is part of a Special Collection on Gynecological Cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"2230-2240"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health care access domains and treatment as mediators of ovarian cancer racial disparities in survival: a structural equation modeling analysis in SEER-Medicare.\",\"authors\":\"Clare Meernik, Quan Chen, Lauren E Wilson, Ashwini Joshi, Fariha Rahman, Maria Pisu, Margaret Liang, Kevin C Ward, Margaret Gates Kuliszewski, Thomas Tucker, Andrew Berchuck, Bin Huang, Tomi Akinyemiju\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwae404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Racial differences in health care access (HCA) may contribute to disparities in ovarian cancer (OC) survival. We used structural equation models (SEMs) to examine associations between race and HCA domains (affordability, availability, accessibility) in relation to overall and OC-specific mortality. Non-Hispanic (NH)-Black and non-Black (Hispanic, NH-White) women diagnosed with OC in 2008-2015 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to conduct mediation analysis for associations between race and HCA domains with overall and OC-specific mortality. SEM models adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. A total of 4629 eligible patients with OC were identified, including 255 (5.5%) patients who were NH-Black. In SEM adjusting for demographic, clinical, and HCA latent variables, there was a total effect of NH-Black race on overall (HR, 1.11, 95% CI, 1.03-1.19) and OC-specific mortality (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08, 1.24), which was primarily driven by a direct effect. There was a modest indirect association between NH-Black race and mortality through decreased treatment receipt, though not through HCA. There is a need for studies investigating additional social and biological mechanisms that contribute to worse cancer survival among NH-Black patients. This article is part of a Special Collection on Gynecological Cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2230-2240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae404\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae404","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健可及性(HCA)方面的种族差异可能会导致卵巢癌(OC)生存率的差异。我们使用结构方程模型(SEM)研究了种族和 HCA 领域(可负担性、可获得性、可及性)与总体死亡率和卵巢癌特异性死亡率之间的关系。我们从 SEER-Medicare 中确定了 2008-2015 年诊断为 OC 的非西班牙裔(NH)黑人和非黑人(西班牙裔、NH-白人)妇女。采用 Cox 比例危险度回归对种族和 HCA 领域与总死亡率和 OC 特异性死亡率之间的关系进行了中介分析。使用调整人口统计学和临床协变量的 SEM 模型来估计危险比 (HR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。共确定了 4629 名符合条件的 OC 患者,其中包括 255 名(5.5%)新罕布什尔州黑人患者。在调整了人口统计学、临床和 HCA 潜在变量的 SEM 中,NH-黑人种族对总死亡率(HR:1.11,95% CI:1.03,1.19)和 OC 特异性死亡率(HR:1.16,95% CI:1.08,1.24)有总的影响,这主要是由直接影响驱动的。通过减少接受治疗,NH-黑人种族与死亡率之间存在适度的间接联系,但不是通过 HCA。有必要对导致新罕布什尔州黑人患者癌症生存率降低的其他社会和生物机制进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health care access domains and treatment as mediators of ovarian cancer racial disparities in survival: a structural equation modeling analysis in SEER-Medicare.

Racial differences in health care access (HCA) may contribute to disparities in ovarian cancer (OC) survival. We used structural equation models (SEMs) to examine associations between race and HCA domains (affordability, availability, accessibility) in relation to overall and OC-specific mortality. Non-Hispanic (NH)-Black and non-Black (Hispanic, NH-White) women diagnosed with OC in 2008-2015 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to conduct mediation analysis for associations between race and HCA domains with overall and OC-specific mortality. SEM models adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. A total of 4629 eligible patients with OC were identified, including 255 (5.5%) patients who were NH-Black. In SEM adjusting for demographic, clinical, and HCA latent variables, there was a total effect of NH-Black race on overall (HR, 1.11, 95% CI, 1.03-1.19) and OC-specific mortality (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08, 1.24), which was primarily driven by a direct effect. There was a modest indirect association between NH-Black race and mortality through decreased treatment receipt, though not through HCA. There is a need for studies investigating additional social and biological mechanisms that contribute to worse cancer survival among NH-Black patients. This article is part of a Special Collection on Gynecological Cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信