剔除剩余:易腐食品回收的意外政策后果--社区参与模拟模型的启示

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Mariana Torres Arroyo, Luis Luna-Reyes, Xiaobo Xue Romeiko, Roni Neff, Natasha Pernicka, Peter Crasto-Donelly, Amy Klein, Stacy Pettigrew, Akiko S. Hosler, Christine Bozlak, Beth J. Feingold
{"title":"剔除剩余:易腐食品回收的意外政策后果--社区参与模拟模型的启示","authors":"Mariana Torres Arroyo, Luis Luna-Reyes, Xiaobo Xue Romeiko, Roni Neff, Natasha Pernicka, Peter Crasto-Donelly, Amy Klein, Stacy Pettigrew, Akiko S. Hosler, Christine Bozlak, Beth J. Feingold","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recovering food of high nutritional quality has become an important strategy to address food and nutrition security and waste. Food donation policies have been crafted to address these issues; however, the effectiveness and possible unintended consequences of these policies for perishable surplus remain unclear. Using system dynamics and group model building, we analyzed two donation policy approaches, namely a ‘Farm to Food Bank’ tax credit for farmers and an organic waste ban in New York State. We simulated the effects of these policies on the recovery and redistribution of fresh fruit and vegetable surplus from the farm and retail sectors, reporting changes in quality, availability, and waste generation of these foods within the food rescue system. Simulation results showed how donation policies can unintendedly result in inadequate provision of poor-quality food to vulnerable populations, as well as considerable increases in waste at food rescue organizations. However, enhancing the capacity of these organizations allowed the tax credit to maximize food surplus distribution and minimize waste, and improving both the quality of retail donations and organizations' capacity ensured the success of the organics waste ban. Our findings underscore the need to address systematic issues when dealing with food loss and waste in future programs and policies.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weeding through surplus: Unintended policy consequences for perishable food recovery–Insights from a community-engaged simulation model\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Torres Arroyo, Luis Luna-Reyes, Xiaobo Xue Romeiko, Roni Neff, Natasha Pernicka, Peter Crasto-Donelly, Amy Klein, Stacy Pettigrew, Akiko S. Hosler, Christine Bozlak, Beth J. Feingold\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recovering food of high nutritional quality has become an important strategy to address food and nutrition security and waste. Food donation policies have been crafted to address these issues; however, the effectiveness and possible unintended consequences of these policies for perishable surplus remain unclear. Using system dynamics and group model building, we analyzed two donation policy approaches, namely a ‘Farm to Food Bank’ tax credit for farmers and an organic waste ban in New York State. We simulated the effects of these policies on the recovery and redistribution of fresh fruit and vegetable surplus from the farm and retail sectors, reporting changes in quality, availability, and waste generation of these foods within the food rescue system. Simulation results showed how donation policies can unintendedly result in inadequate provision of poor-quality food to vulnerable populations, as well as considerable increases in waste at food rescue organizations. However, enhancing the capacity of these organizations allowed the tax credit to maximize food surplus distribution and minimize waste, and improving both the quality of retail donations and organizations' capacity ensured the success of the organics waste ban. Our findings underscore the need to address systematic issues when dealing with food loss and waste in future programs and policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143930\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143930","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回收高营养质量的食物已成为解决粮食和营养安全以及浪费问题的重要战略。为解决这些问题,人们制定了粮食捐赠政策;然而,这些政策对易腐剩余物的有效性和可能产生的意外后果仍不清楚。利用系统动力学和群体模型构建,我们分析了两种捐赠政策方法,即针对农民的 "农场到粮食银行 "税收抵免和纽约州的有机废物禁令。我们模拟了这些政策对农场和零售部门剩余新鲜水果和蔬菜的回收和再分配的影响,报告了这些食品在食品救援系统中的质量、可用性和废物产生量的变化。模拟结果表明,捐赠政策可能会无意中导致向弱势群体提供的劣质食品不足,以及食品救援组织的浪费大量增加。然而,通过提高这些组织的能力,税收减免可以最大限度地分配剩余食物并减少浪费,而提高零售捐赠的质量和组织的能力则确保了有机废物禁令的成功。我们的研究结果强调,在未来的计划和政策中处理食物损失和浪费问题时,需要解决系统性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weeding through surplus: Unintended policy consequences for perishable food recovery–Insights from a community-engaged simulation model
Recovering food of high nutritional quality has become an important strategy to address food and nutrition security and waste. Food donation policies have been crafted to address these issues; however, the effectiveness and possible unintended consequences of these policies for perishable surplus remain unclear. Using system dynamics and group model building, we analyzed two donation policy approaches, namely a ‘Farm to Food Bank’ tax credit for farmers and an organic waste ban in New York State. We simulated the effects of these policies on the recovery and redistribution of fresh fruit and vegetable surplus from the farm and retail sectors, reporting changes in quality, availability, and waste generation of these foods within the food rescue system. Simulation results showed how donation policies can unintendedly result in inadequate provision of poor-quality food to vulnerable populations, as well as considerable increases in waste at food rescue organizations. However, enhancing the capacity of these organizations allowed the tax credit to maximize food surplus distribution and minimize waste, and improving both the quality of retail donations and organizations' capacity ensured the success of the organics waste ban. Our findings underscore the need to address systematic issues when dealing with food loss and waste in future programs and policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信