{"title":"对从放牧和施肥牧场得出的涡度协方差 N2O 排放量进行分区和驱动力分析","authors":"Lena Barczyk , Johan Six , Christof Ammann","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Managed pastures are strong sources for the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) through various nitrogen (N) inputs. So far, chamber measurements have been used to quantify N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and emissions factors of specific emissions sources like grazing cattle excreta. This study presents a three-year dataset of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from a grazed and fertilized pasture measured by eddy covariance (EC) in eastern Switzerland. N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes were gap-filled and disaggregated into the emission sources (flux partitioning) by using random forest. The excreta N deposition in the pasture was estimated based on a cattle nitrogen budget approach using observed milk yield, body weight and feed intake of the cattle herd. Furthermore, a driver analysis was performed to quantify the relationship between N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and predictor variables. The observed annual N<sub>2</sub>O emissions amounted to 5.3 ± 0.8, 3.1 ± 0.5 and 4.4 ± 0.7 kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> and were disaggregated into background, fertilizer and excreta related N<sub>2</sub>O emissions with contributions of 27–46 %, 15–40 % and 30–51 %, respectively. Combining the excreta N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes with the excreta N inputs resulted in an average emission factor (EF) for cattle excreta of 1.1 ± 0.5 %, that tends to be higher than the IPCC default value of 0.6 % for wet climates. While maximum N<sub>2</sub>O emissions usually were observed after fertilizer application and under optimum soil moisture conditions as expected, distinct N<sub>2</sub>O emission peaks also occurred during a longer drought period in summer and could be parametrised as a function of precipitation and previous grazing activity. Moreover, peak N<sub>2</sub>O emissions occurred during the cold season at low temperatures and should be considered in future studies. Overall, we suggest that EC measurements under pasture conditions with subsequent flux partitioning by random forest are suitable for quantifying pasture N<sub>2</sub>O emissions of different sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"359 ","pages":"Article 110278"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partitioning and driver analysis of eddy covariance derived N2O emissions from a grazed and fertilized pasture\",\"authors\":\"Lena Barczyk , Johan Six , Christof Ammann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Managed pastures are strong sources for the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) through various nitrogen (N) inputs. So far, chamber measurements have been used to quantify N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and emissions factors of specific emissions sources like grazing cattle excreta. This study presents a three-year dataset of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from a grazed and fertilized pasture measured by eddy covariance (EC) in eastern Switzerland. N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes were gap-filled and disaggregated into the emission sources (flux partitioning) by using random forest. The excreta N deposition in the pasture was estimated based on a cattle nitrogen budget approach using observed milk yield, body weight and feed intake of the cattle herd. Furthermore, a driver analysis was performed to quantify the relationship between N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and predictor variables. The observed annual N<sub>2</sub>O emissions amounted to 5.3 ± 0.8, 3.1 ± 0.5 and 4.4 ± 0.7 kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> and were disaggregated into background, fertilizer and excreta related N<sub>2</sub>O emissions with contributions of 27–46 %, 15–40 % and 30–51 %, respectively. Combining the excreta N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes with the excreta N inputs resulted in an average emission factor (EF) for cattle excreta of 1.1 ± 0.5 %, that tends to be higher than the IPCC default value of 0.6 % for wet climates. While maximum N<sub>2</sub>O emissions usually were observed after fertilizer application and under optimum soil moisture conditions as expected, distinct N<sub>2</sub>O emission peaks also occurred during a longer drought period in summer and could be parametrised as a function of precipitation and previous grazing activity. Moreover, peak N<sub>2</sub>O emissions occurred during the cold season at low temperatures and should be considered in future studies. Overall, we suggest that EC measurements under pasture conditions with subsequent flux partitioning by random forest are suitable for quantifying pasture N<sub>2</sub>O emissions of different sources.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"359 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324003915\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324003915","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Partitioning and driver analysis of eddy covariance derived N2O emissions from a grazed and fertilized pasture
Managed pastures are strong sources for the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O) through various nitrogen (N) inputs. So far, chamber measurements have been used to quantify N2O emissions and emissions factors of specific emissions sources like grazing cattle excreta. This study presents a three-year dataset of N2O emissions from a grazed and fertilized pasture measured by eddy covariance (EC) in eastern Switzerland. N2O fluxes were gap-filled and disaggregated into the emission sources (flux partitioning) by using random forest. The excreta N deposition in the pasture was estimated based on a cattle nitrogen budget approach using observed milk yield, body weight and feed intake of the cattle herd. Furthermore, a driver analysis was performed to quantify the relationship between N2O emissions and predictor variables. The observed annual N2O emissions amounted to 5.3 ± 0.8, 3.1 ± 0.5 and 4.4 ± 0.7 kg N2O-N ha-1 yr-1 and were disaggregated into background, fertilizer and excreta related N2O emissions with contributions of 27–46 %, 15–40 % and 30–51 %, respectively. Combining the excreta N2O fluxes with the excreta N inputs resulted in an average emission factor (EF) for cattle excreta of 1.1 ± 0.5 %, that tends to be higher than the IPCC default value of 0.6 % for wet climates. While maximum N2O emissions usually were observed after fertilizer application and under optimum soil moisture conditions as expected, distinct N2O emission peaks also occurred during a longer drought period in summer and could be parametrised as a function of precipitation and previous grazing activity. Moreover, peak N2O emissions occurred during the cold season at low temperatures and should be considered in future studies. Overall, we suggest that EC measurements under pasture conditions with subsequent flux partitioning by random forest are suitable for quantifying pasture N2O emissions of different sources.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.