使用免疫调节疗法治疗非感染性葡萄膜炎:国际眼部炎症协会真实世界实践报告

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jasmin A Branford, Bahram Bodaghi, Lisia Barros Ferreira, Peter J McCluskey, Jennifer E Thorne, Janet M Matthews, International Study Group for Systemic Immunomodulatory Drug Treatment of Non‐Infectious Uveitis, Justine R Smith
{"title":"使用免疫调节疗法治疗非感染性葡萄膜炎:国际眼部炎症协会真实世界实践报告","authors":"Jasmin A Branford, Bahram Bodaghi, Lisia Barros Ferreira, Peter J McCluskey, Jennifer E Thorne, Janet M Matthews, International Study Group for Systemic Immunomodulatory Drug Treatment of Non‐Infectious Uveitis, Justine R Smith","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-326239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Non-infectious uveitis is a diverse group of inflammatory conditions that collectively account for substantial blindness worldwide. Expert guidelines and results of clinical trials guide treatment, but real-world clinical care is impacted by additional factors. In 2023, an international group of uveitis-specialised ophthalmologists formed the International Study Group for Systemic Immunomodulatory Drug Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis to report current practice. Methods 221 study group members from 53 countries completed a 30-item questionnaire on their management of non-infectious uveitis including: indications for and investigations prior to initiating systemic immunomodulatory drugs, use of conventional and biological drugs, and follow-up of treated patients. Results Major indications to initiate systemic immunomodulatory drugs were: uveitis not controlled with oral prednis(ol)one (n=208, 94.1%), specific uveitis diagnosis (n=197, 89.1%), and patient intolerance of oral prednis(ol)one (n=186, 84.2%). All members (n=221, 100%) performed pretreatment screens including: blood chemistry (n=217, 98.2%), blood examination (n=207, 93.7%), and Quantiferon assay (n=196, 88.7%). Eight conventional and 14 biological drugs were prescribed: methotrexate was the preferred conventional drug overall (n=126, 57.0%) and for 9 of 11 uveitides, and adalimumab was the preferred biological drug overall (n=216, 97.7%) and for 11 of 11 uveitides. When drugs were combined, methotrexate plus adalimumab was most popular (n=158 of 188 members, 84.0%). Patients with inactive uveitis were typically evaluated and screened for drug toxicity every 6–12 weeks (n=161, 72.9%, and 165, 74.7%, respectively). Conclusion Our report describes practice patterns of a large international group of uveitis specialists treating non-infectious uveitis with systemic immunomodulatory drugs. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of immunomodulatory treatment for non-infectious uveitis: an International Ocular Inflammation Society report of real-world practice\",\"authors\":\"Jasmin A Branford, Bahram Bodaghi, Lisia Barros Ferreira, Peter J McCluskey, Jennifer E Thorne, Janet M Matthews, International Study Group for Systemic Immunomodulatory Drug Treatment of Non‐Infectious Uveitis, Justine R Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bjo-2024-326239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Non-infectious uveitis is a diverse group of inflammatory conditions that collectively account for substantial blindness worldwide. Expert guidelines and results of clinical trials guide treatment, but real-world clinical care is impacted by additional factors. In 2023, an international group of uveitis-specialised ophthalmologists formed the International Study Group for Systemic Immunomodulatory Drug Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis to report current practice. Methods 221 study group members from 53 countries completed a 30-item questionnaire on their management of non-infectious uveitis including: indications for and investigations prior to initiating systemic immunomodulatory drugs, use of conventional and biological drugs, and follow-up of treated patients. Results Major indications to initiate systemic immunomodulatory drugs were: uveitis not controlled with oral prednis(ol)one (n=208, 94.1%), specific uveitis diagnosis (n=197, 89.1%), and patient intolerance of oral prednis(ol)one (n=186, 84.2%). All members (n=221, 100%) performed pretreatment screens including: blood chemistry (n=217, 98.2%), blood examination (n=207, 93.7%), and Quantiferon assay (n=196, 88.7%). Eight conventional and 14 biological drugs were prescribed: methotrexate was the preferred conventional drug overall (n=126, 57.0%) and for 9 of 11 uveitides, and adalimumab was the preferred biological drug overall (n=216, 97.7%) and for 11 of 11 uveitides. When drugs were combined, methotrexate plus adalimumab was most popular (n=158 of 188 members, 84.0%). Patients with inactive uveitis were typically evaluated and screened for drug toxicity every 6–12 weeks (n=161, 72.9%, and 165, 74.7%, respectively). Conclusion Our report describes practice patterns of a large international group of uveitis specialists treating non-infectious uveitis with systemic immunomodulatory drugs. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-326239\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-326239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景非感染性葡萄膜炎是一类多种多样的炎症,在全球范围内造成了大量失明。专家指南和临床试验结果为治疗提供了指导,但实际临床护理还受到其他因素的影响。2023 年,一个由葡萄膜炎专科眼科医生组成的国际组织成立了 "系统免疫调节药物治疗非感染性葡萄膜炎国际研究小组",以报告当前的治疗方法。方法 来自 53 个国家的 221 名研究小组成员填写了一份 30 个项目的调查问卷,内容涉及他们对非感染性葡萄膜炎的治疗方法,包括:开始使用全身免疫调节药物的适应症和使用前的检查、传统药物和生物药物的使用以及治疗患者的随访。结果 开始使用全身免疫调节药物的主要适应症是:经口服泼尼松(OL)一药未控制的葡萄膜炎(208 人,94.1%)、特异性葡萄膜炎诊断(197 人,89.1%)和患者对口服泼尼松(OL)一药不耐受(186 人,84.2%)。所有成员(n=221,100%)都进行了预处理筛查,包括:血液化学(n=217,98.2%)、血液检查(n=207,93.7%)和定量分析(n=196,88.7%)。处方中使用了8种常规药物和14种生物药物:总体而言,甲氨蝶呤是首选的常规药物(n=126,57.0%),11种葡萄胎中有9种使用了甲氨蝶呤;总体而言,阿达木单抗是首选的生物药物(n=216,97.7%),11种葡萄胎中有11种使用了阿达木单抗。联合用药时,甲氨蝶呤加阿达木单抗最受欢迎(188名成员中158名,84.0%)。非活动性葡萄膜炎患者通常每 6-12 周接受一次药物毒性评估和筛查(分别为 161 人,72.9% 和 165 人,74.7%)。结论 我们的报告描述了一个大型国际葡萄膜炎专家小组使用全身免疫调节药物治疗非感染性葡萄膜炎的实践模式。与研究相关的所有数据均包含在文章中或作为补充信息上传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of immunomodulatory treatment for non-infectious uveitis: an International Ocular Inflammation Society report of real-world practice
Background Non-infectious uveitis is a diverse group of inflammatory conditions that collectively account for substantial blindness worldwide. Expert guidelines and results of clinical trials guide treatment, but real-world clinical care is impacted by additional factors. In 2023, an international group of uveitis-specialised ophthalmologists formed the International Study Group for Systemic Immunomodulatory Drug Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis to report current practice. Methods 221 study group members from 53 countries completed a 30-item questionnaire on their management of non-infectious uveitis including: indications for and investigations prior to initiating systemic immunomodulatory drugs, use of conventional and biological drugs, and follow-up of treated patients. Results Major indications to initiate systemic immunomodulatory drugs were: uveitis not controlled with oral prednis(ol)one (n=208, 94.1%), specific uveitis diagnosis (n=197, 89.1%), and patient intolerance of oral prednis(ol)one (n=186, 84.2%). All members (n=221, 100%) performed pretreatment screens including: blood chemistry (n=217, 98.2%), blood examination (n=207, 93.7%), and Quantiferon assay (n=196, 88.7%). Eight conventional and 14 biological drugs were prescribed: methotrexate was the preferred conventional drug overall (n=126, 57.0%) and for 9 of 11 uveitides, and adalimumab was the preferred biological drug overall (n=216, 97.7%) and for 11 of 11 uveitides. When drugs were combined, methotrexate plus adalimumab was most popular (n=158 of 188 members, 84.0%). Patients with inactive uveitis were typically evaluated and screened for drug toxicity every 6–12 weeks (n=161, 72.9%, and 165, 74.7%, respectively). Conclusion Our report describes practice patterns of a large international group of uveitis specialists treating non-infectious uveitis with systemic immunomodulatory drugs. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信