通过利用生物启发元搜索算法优化提升算法,加强对地下水易发区的空间预测

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Seyed Vahid Razavi-Termeh, Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki, Sani I. Abba, Farman Ali, Soo-Mi Choi
{"title":"通过利用生物启发元搜索算法优化提升算法,加强对地下水易发区的空间预测","authors":"Seyed Vahid Razavi-Termeh,&nbsp;Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki,&nbsp;Sani I. Abba,&nbsp;Farman Ali,&nbsp;Soo-Mi Choi","doi":"10.1007/s13201-024-02301-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Groundwater resources are essential for ensuring a consistent water supply in many regions. Groundwater potential maps (GPMs) can be utilized in many ways to estimate the quantity, quality, and distribution of subsurface water, supporting the decision-making processes of numerous stakeholders. This study contributes to improving the accuracy of GPMs, focusing on implementing Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) models. For this purpose, the accuracy performance of the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm is improved in this study. To do this, two such popular metaheuristic algorithms, i.e., invasive weed optimization (IWO) and biogeography-based optimization (BBO), are integrated into the XGBoost algorithm for modeling and spatial prediction of the areas prone to groundwater. Three models—XGBoost, XGBoost-IWO, and XGBoost-BBO—are implemented within the Python programming environments to execute spatial modeling and generate predictive maps. The evaluation of results unfolds in two stages: model validation and GPM validation. For the training data, the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) indices were 0.165 and 0.121 for XGBoost, 0.13 and 0.087 for XGBoost-IWO, and 0.114 and 0.082 for XGBoost-BBO, respectively. The test data showed similar trends, with XGBoost yielding RMSE and MAE values of 0.424 and 0.295, XGBoost-IWO at 0.416 and 0.287, and XGBoost-BBO at 0.39 and 0.28. XGBoost-BBO, XGBoost-IWO, and XGBoost had a prediction accuracy higher than other models. The respective area under the curve (AUC) of GMPs using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for XGBoost, XGBoost-IWO, and XGBoost-BBO were 81.8 %, 83.1 %, and 83.7 %. Using bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithms, the GPM accuracy rate has improved further. The study of groundwater resources demonstrated how geological feature extraction by GeoAI may help employ advanced techniques.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-024-02301-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing spatial prediction of groundwater-prone areas through optimization of a boosting algorithm with bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Vahid Razavi-Termeh,&nbsp;Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki,&nbsp;Sani I. Abba,&nbsp;Farman Ali,&nbsp;Soo-Mi Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13201-024-02301-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Groundwater resources are essential for ensuring a consistent water supply in many regions. Groundwater potential maps (GPMs) can be utilized in many ways to estimate the quantity, quality, and distribution of subsurface water, supporting the decision-making processes of numerous stakeholders. This study contributes to improving the accuracy of GPMs, focusing on implementing Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) models. For this purpose, the accuracy performance of the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm is improved in this study. To do this, two such popular metaheuristic algorithms, i.e., invasive weed optimization (IWO) and biogeography-based optimization (BBO), are integrated into the XGBoost algorithm for modeling and spatial prediction of the areas prone to groundwater. Three models—XGBoost, XGBoost-IWO, and XGBoost-BBO—are implemented within the Python programming environments to execute spatial modeling and generate predictive maps. The evaluation of results unfolds in two stages: model validation and GPM validation. For the training data, the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) indices were 0.165 and 0.121 for XGBoost, 0.13 and 0.087 for XGBoost-IWO, and 0.114 and 0.082 for XGBoost-BBO, respectively. The test data showed similar trends, with XGBoost yielding RMSE and MAE values of 0.424 and 0.295, XGBoost-IWO at 0.416 and 0.287, and XGBoost-BBO at 0.39 and 0.28. XGBoost-BBO, XGBoost-IWO, and XGBoost had a prediction accuracy higher than other models. The respective area under the curve (AUC) of GMPs using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for XGBoost, XGBoost-IWO, and XGBoost-BBO were 81.8 %, 83.1 %, and 83.7 %. Using bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithms, the GPM accuracy rate has improved further. The study of groundwater resources demonstrated how geological feature extraction by GeoAI may help employ advanced techniques.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"volume\":\"14 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-024-02301-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-024-02301-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-024-02301-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地下水资源对于确保许多地区的稳定供水至关重要。地下水潜势图(GPM)可用于多种方式估算地下水的数量、质量和分布,为众多利益相关者的决策过程提供支持。本研究有助于提高地下水潜势图的精度,重点是实施地理空间人工智能(GeoAI)模型。为此,本研究改进了极端梯度提升(XGBoost)算法的准确性。为此,在 XGBoost 算法中集成了两种流行的元启发式算法,即入侵杂草优化算法(IWO)和基于生物地理学的优化算法(BBO),用于地下水易发区的建模和空间预测。三个模型--XGBoost、XGBoost-IWO 和 XGBoost-BBO 均在 Python 编程环境中实现,以执行空间建模并生成预测地图。结果评估分为两个阶段:模型验证和 GPM 验证。对于训练数据,XGBoost 的均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)指数分别为 0.165 和 0.121,XGBoost-IWO 为 0.13 和 0.087,XGBoost-BBO 为 0.114 和 0.082。测试数据显示了类似的趋势,XGBoost 的 RMSE 和 MAE 值分别为 0.424 和 0.295,XGBoost-IWO 为 0.416 和 0.287,XGBoost-BBO 为 0.39 和 0.28。XGBoost-BBO、XGBoost-IWO 和 XGBoost 的预测准确率高于其他模型。XGBoost、XGBoost-IWO 和 XGBoost-BBO 使用接收器操作特征曲线计算的 GMP 曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 81.8%、83.1% 和 83.7%。利用生物启发元启发式算法,GPM 的准确率进一步提高。对地下水资源的研究表明,利用 GeoAI 提取地质特征有助于采用先进技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Enhancing spatial prediction of groundwater-prone areas through optimization of a boosting algorithm with bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithms

Enhancing spatial prediction of groundwater-prone areas through optimization of a boosting algorithm with bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithms

Groundwater resources are essential for ensuring a consistent water supply in many regions. Groundwater potential maps (GPMs) can be utilized in many ways to estimate the quantity, quality, and distribution of subsurface water, supporting the decision-making processes of numerous stakeholders. This study contributes to improving the accuracy of GPMs, focusing on implementing Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) models. For this purpose, the accuracy performance of the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm is improved in this study. To do this, two such popular metaheuristic algorithms, i.e., invasive weed optimization (IWO) and biogeography-based optimization (BBO), are integrated into the XGBoost algorithm for modeling and spatial prediction of the areas prone to groundwater. Three models—XGBoost, XGBoost-IWO, and XGBoost-BBO—are implemented within the Python programming environments to execute spatial modeling and generate predictive maps. The evaluation of results unfolds in two stages: model validation and GPM validation. For the training data, the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) indices were 0.165 and 0.121 for XGBoost, 0.13 and 0.087 for XGBoost-IWO, and 0.114 and 0.082 for XGBoost-BBO, respectively. The test data showed similar trends, with XGBoost yielding RMSE and MAE values of 0.424 and 0.295, XGBoost-IWO at 0.416 and 0.287, and XGBoost-BBO at 0.39 and 0.28. XGBoost-BBO, XGBoost-IWO, and XGBoost had a prediction accuracy higher than other models. The respective area under the curve (AUC) of GMPs using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for XGBoost, XGBoost-IWO, and XGBoost-BBO were 81.8 %, 83.1 %, and 83.7 %. Using bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithms, the GPM accuracy rate has improved further. The study of groundwater resources demonstrated how geological feature extraction by GeoAI may help employ advanced techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信