热带和亚热带地区免耕条件下的土壤有机质动态和土壤碳储量:一项农场研究

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"热带和亚热带地区免耕条件下的土壤有机质动态和土壤碳储量:一项农场研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2024.108491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the mechanisms of soil organic matter (SOM) stabilization is fundamental to soil carbon sequestration and reduction of greenhouse gas emission (GEE), playing a pivotal role in the soil carbon cycle. Soil samples were collected from 1-meter trenches in no-till systems and compared to native vegetation, totalizing 256 samples from commercial farms in the <em>Cerrado</em>, Atlantic Forest, and <em>Pampa</em> Brazilian biomes. Soil fractionation (&gt;53 µm and &lt; 53 µm), laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy (LIFS), and δ<sup>13</sup>C isotopic analysis were employed to investigate SOM dynamics and their relationships with soil carbon stocks. SOM presents chemical compounds more susceptible to decomposition in the surface, increasing its recalcitrance in deeper layers. Over 90 % of soil carbon is in the &lt; 53 μm fraction, indicating organo-mineral association as the major SOM stabilization mechanism. However, in a minor extension physical protection by soil aggregation, can play a role in SOM stabilization. H<sub>LIFS</sub> from &lt; 53 μm fraction demonstrated that SOM in these agricultural areas contains more labile compounds than in native vegetation areas, indicating recently incorporated less transformed organic material. Farms 2 and 4 (<em>Cerrado</em>) showed increases in carbon stocks in agricultural areas compared to native vegetation of 89 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup> and 24 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, with distinct δ<sup>13</sup>C patterns. Farm 1 (Atlantic Forest) presented a reduction of 59 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup>, primarily due to land use change, from native vegetation to agriculture. Farm 3 (<em>Pampa</em>) maintained its carbon stock, with no differences in δ<sup>13</sup>C patterns. These findings provide valuable insights into SOM stabilization for carbon sequestration, and the benefits of conservationist management practices, emphasizing the importance of generate data from on-farm research experiments. Measurements from agricultural and native vegetation areas in on-farm research across commercial farms provide real-field data to optimize protocols and support good management practices for enhancing soil carbon sequestration in tropical regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil organic matter dynamics and soil carbon stocks from tropical and sub-tropical areas under no-till: An on-farm research\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.catena.2024.108491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding the mechanisms of soil organic matter (SOM) stabilization is fundamental to soil carbon sequestration and reduction of greenhouse gas emission (GEE), playing a pivotal role in the soil carbon cycle. Soil samples were collected from 1-meter trenches in no-till systems and compared to native vegetation, totalizing 256 samples from commercial farms in the <em>Cerrado</em>, Atlantic Forest, and <em>Pampa</em> Brazilian biomes. Soil fractionation (&gt;53 µm and &lt; 53 µm), laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy (LIFS), and δ<sup>13</sup>C isotopic analysis were employed to investigate SOM dynamics and their relationships with soil carbon stocks. SOM presents chemical compounds more susceptible to decomposition in the surface, increasing its recalcitrance in deeper layers. Over 90 % of soil carbon is in the &lt; 53 μm fraction, indicating organo-mineral association as the major SOM stabilization mechanism. However, in a minor extension physical protection by soil aggregation, can play a role in SOM stabilization. H<sub>LIFS</sub> from &lt; 53 μm fraction demonstrated that SOM in these agricultural areas contains more labile compounds than in native vegetation areas, indicating recently incorporated less transformed organic material. Farms 2 and 4 (<em>Cerrado</em>) showed increases in carbon stocks in agricultural areas compared to native vegetation of 89 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup> and 24 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, with distinct δ<sup>13</sup>C patterns. Farm 1 (Atlantic Forest) presented a reduction of 59 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup>, primarily due to land use change, from native vegetation to agriculture. Farm 3 (<em>Pampa</em>) maintained its carbon stock, with no differences in δ<sup>13</sup>C patterns. These findings provide valuable insights into SOM stabilization for carbon sequestration, and the benefits of conservationist management practices, emphasizing the importance of generate data from on-farm research experiments. Measurements from agricultural and native vegetation areas in on-farm research across commercial farms provide real-field data to optimize protocols and support good management practices for enhancing soil carbon sequestration in tropical regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catena\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181622400688X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181622400688X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解土壤有机质(SOM)的稳定机制是土壤固碳和减少温室气体排放(GEE)的基础,在土壤碳循环中起着举足轻重的作用。我们从免耕系统的 1 米沟渠中采集了土壤样本,并与本地植被进行了比较,共采集了 256 个样本,分别来自巴西塞拉多、大西洋森林和潘帕生物群落的商业农场。采用土壤分馏(53 µm 和 53 µm)、激光诱导荧光光谱(LIFS)和 δ13C 同位素分析来研究 SOM 的动态及其与土壤碳储量的关系。SOM 在表层呈现出更易分解的化合物,而在深层则增加了其钙化性。超过 90% 的土壤碳位于 53 μm 部分,这表明有机-矿物结合是 SOM 的主要稳定机制。不过,土壤团聚的物理保护作用也会对 SOM 的稳定起到一定作用。来自 53 μm 部分的 HLIFS 表明,与原生植被地区相比,这些农业地区的 SOM 含有更多的易变化合物,这表明最近加入的转化有机物质较少。农场 2 和农场 4(塞拉多)显示,与本地植被相比,农业区的碳储量分别增加了 89 兆克碳(公顷-1)和 24 兆克碳(公顷-1),δ13C 的模式也截然不同。农场 1(大西洋森林)的碳储量减少了 59 兆克碳/公顷-1,主要原因是土地利用发生了变化,从原生植被变为农业用地。3号农场(潘帕)保持了碳储量,δ13C模式没有差异。这些发现为稳定 SOM 以实现碳固存以及保护主义管理方法的益处提供了宝贵的见解,强调了从农场研究实验中生成数据的重要性。在商业农场的农场研究中,对农业区和原生植被区进行的测量为优化方案提供了真实的现场数据,并为加强热带地区土壤固碳的良好管理实践提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soil organic matter dynamics and soil carbon stocks from tropical and sub-tropical areas under no-till: An on-farm research
Understanding the mechanisms of soil organic matter (SOM) stabilization is fundamental to soil carbon sequestration and reduction of greenhouse gas emission (GEE), playing a pivotal role in the soil carbon cycle. Soil samples were collected from 1-meter trenches in no-till systems and compared to native vegetation, totalizing 256 samples from commercial farms in the Cerrado, Atlantic Forest, and Pampa Brazilian biomes. Soil fractionation (>53 µm and < 53 µm), laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy (LIFS), and δ13C isotopic analysis were employed to investigate SOM dynamics and their relationships with soil carbon stocks. SOM presents chemical compounds more susceptible to decomposition in the surface, increasing its recalcitrance in deeper layers. Over 90 % of soil carbon is in the < 53 μm fraction, indicating organo-mineral association as the major SOM stabilization mechanism. However, in a minor extension physical protection by soil aggregation, can play a role in SOM stabilization. HLIFS from < 53 μm fraction demonstrated that SOM in these agricultural areas contains more labile compounds than in native vegetation areas, indicating recently incorporated less transformed organic material. Farms 2 and 4 (Cerrado) showed increases in carbon stocks in agricultural areas compared to native vegetation of 89 Mg C ha-1 and 24 Mg C ha-1, respectively, with distinct δ13C patterns. Farm 1 (Atlantic Forest) presented a reduction of 59 Mg C ha-1, primarily due to land use change, from native vegetation to agriculture. Farm 3 (Pampa) maintained its carbon stock, with no differences in δ13C patterns. These findings provide valuable insights into SOM stabilization for carbon sequestration, and the benefits of conservationist management practices, emphasizing the importance of generate data from on-farm research experiments. Measurements from agricultural and native vegetation areas in on-farm research across commercial farms provide real-field data to optimize protocols and support good management practices for enhancing soil carbon sequestration in tropical regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信