硬币的两面:评估小型电网可靠性与利润之间的权衡以及对补贴政策的影响

IF 10.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Lefu Maqelepo , Fhazhil Wamalwa , Nathan Williams , Jay Taneja
{"title":"硬币的两面:评估小型电网可靠性与利润之间的权衡以及对补贴政策的影响","authors":"Lefu Maqelepo ,&nbsp;Fhazhil Wamalwa ,&nbsp;Nathan Williams ,&nbsp;Jay Taneja","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Universal access to electricity is an important milestone featured in countries development plans. It is well understood within the energy practitioner and research communities that to reach this milestone, distributed energy resources, especially mini grids, are to play a crucial role as they represent a least cost alternative to reach most rural communities. The success of mini grids though is highly reliant on favorable policies, particularly regulations pertaining to tariffs (i.e., electricity rates). In this research, we use Tanzania as a case study to investigate the likely consequences of grid and mini grid tariff equalization regulation which ignores the fact that the tariff charged on the grid is highly subsidized compared to mini grid tariffs that must be cost reflective for mini grid utilities to be financially sustainable. We recognize that a private mini grid operator has an obligation to make profits for the investors. Because of this, they have two critical yet divergent operating points from which to choose: (1) serving 100% of the demand at all times, potentially incurring operating losses during some periods and (2) partially serving the demand to maximize returns, potentially compromising customer satisfaction. Using an empirically-informed model of a mini grid sized to minimize net present cost that supplies power to 500 customers, we quantify the cost of reliability between these two key operating points and trace the curve relating profit and reliability, for two types of load scenarios: fixed loads and fixed plus flexible loads. We found that profit is optimized at a reliability of 92.3% and 86.0% for systems that meet fixed loads and fixed plus flexible loads respectively. This reduced reliability can have crucial implications on the viability of mini grids for providing electricity access, as customer dissatisfaction and profits may erode. We show that under the policy of tariff equalization between the centralized grid and mini grids, the latter is challenged to survive and therefore the communities which are being served through mini grids may experience de-electrification, which would represent a huge regression with regards to meeting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7) of universal electricity access.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 124726"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two sides of a coin: Assessing trade-offs between reliability and profit in mini grids and the policy implications for subsidies\",\"authors\":\"Lefu Maqelepo ,&nbsp;Fhazhil Wamalwa ,&nbsp;Nathan Williams ,&nbsp;Jay Taneja\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Universal access to electricity is an important milestone featured in countries development plans. It is well understood within the energy practitioner and research communities that to reach this milestone, distributed energy resources, especially mini grids, are to play a crucial role as they represent a least cost alternative to reach most rural communities. The success of mini grids though is highly reliant on favorable policies, particularly regulations pertaining to tariffs (i.e., electricity rates). In this research, we use Tanzania as a case study to investigate the likely consequences of grid and mini grid tariff equalization regulation which ignores the fact that the tariff charged on the grid is highly subsidized compared to mini grid tariffs that must be cost reflective for mini grid utilities to be financially sustainable. We recognize that a private mini grid operator has an obligation to make profits for the investors. Because of this, they have two critical yet divergent operating points from which to choose: (1) serving 100% of the demand at all times, potentially incurring operating losses during some periods and (2) partially serving the demand to maximize returns, potentially compromising customer satisfaction. Using an empirically-informed model of a mini grid sized to minimize net present cost that supplies power to 500 customers, we quantify the cost of reliability between these two key operating points and trace the curve relating profit and reliability, for two types of load scenarios: fixed loads and fixed plus flexible loads. We found that profit is optimized at a reliability of 92.3% and 86.0% for systems that meet fixed loads and fixed plus flexible loads respectively. This reduced reliability can have crucial implications on the viability of mini grids for providing electricity access, as customer dissatisfaction and profits may erode. We show that under the policy of tariff equalization between the centralized grid and mini grids, the latter is challenged to survive and therefore the communities which are being served through mini grids may experience de-electrification, which would represent a huge regression with regards to meeting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7) of universal electricity access.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"378 \",\"pages\":\"Article 124726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924021093\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924021093","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

普及用电是各国发展计划中的一个重要里程碑。能源从业者和研究界都清楚地认识到,要实现这一里程碑,分布式能源资源,特别是微型电网,将发挥至关重要的作用,因为它们是向大多数农村社区供电的成本最低的替代方案。不过,小型电网的成功在很大程度上取决于有利的政策,尤其是与电价(即电费)相关的法规。在这项研究中,我们以坦桑尼亚为案例,调查电网和微型电网电价均衡化法规可能产生的后果,因为这种法规忽视了一个事实,即与微型电网的电价相比,电网的电价得到了高额补贴,而微型电网的电价必须反映成本,这样微型电网公用事业才能在财务上可持续发展。我们认识到,私营微型电网运营商有义务为投资者赚取利润。因此,他们有两个关键而又不同的运营点可供选择:(1) 始终为 100%的需求提供服务,但在某些时段可能会出现运营亏损;(2) 部分为需求提供服务,以实现收益最大化,但可能会影响客户满意度。我们利用一个小型电网的经验模型,以最小化净现值成本的方式为 500 个客户供电,量化了这两个关键运营点之间的可靠性成本,并追踪了两种负载情况下利润与可靠性之间的关系曲线:固定负载和固定加灵活负载。我们发现,在满足固定负载和固定加灵活负载的情况下,可靠性分别为 92.3% 和 86.0% 时,系统的利润达到最佳状态。可靠性的降低会对小型电网提供电力的可行性产生重要影响,因为客户的不满和利润可能会受到侵蚀。我们的研究表明,在集中电网和微型电网之间实行电价均等化的政策下,微型电网的生存面临挑战,因此,通过微型电网提供服务的社区可能会经历非电气化,这将意味着在实现联合国可持续发展目标 7(SDG7)--普及电力供应方面出现巨大倒退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two sides of a coin: Assessing trade-offs between reliability and profit in mini grids and the policy implications for subsidies
Universal access to electricity is an important milestone featured in countries development plans. It is well understood within the energy practitioner and research communities that to reach this milestone, distributed energy resources, especially mini grids, are to play a crucial role as they represent a least cost alternative to reach most rural communities. The success of mini grids though is highly reliant on favorable policies, particularly regulations pertaining to tariffs (i.e., electricity rates). In this research, we use Tanzania as a case study to investigate the likely consequences of grid and mini grid tariff equalization regulation which ignores the fact that the tariff charged on the grid is highly subsidized compared to mini grid tariffs that must be cost reflective for mini grid utilities to be financially sustainable. We recognize that a private mini grid operator has an obligation to make profits for the investors. Because of this, they have two critical yet divergent operating points from which to choose: (1) serving 100% of the demand at all times, potentially incurring operating losses during some periods and (2) partially serving the demand to maximize returns, potentially compromising customer satisfaction. Using an empirically-informed model of a mini grid sized to minimize net present cost that supplies power to 500 customers, we quantify the cost of reliability between these two key operating points and trace the curve relating profit and reliability, for two types of load scenarios: fixed loads and fixed plus flexible loads. We found that profit is optimized at a reliability of 92.3% and 86.0% for systems that meet fixed loads and fixed plus flexible loads respectively. This reduced reliability can have crucial implications on the viability of mini grids for providing electricity access, as customer dissatisfaction and profits may erode. We show that under the policy of tariff equalization between the centralized grid and mini grids, the latter is challenged to survive and therefore the communities which are being served through mini grids may experience de-electrification, which would represent a huge regression with regards to meeting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7) of universal electricity access.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信