变废为宝:评估废玻璃替代混凝土的性能

Kushal Rana Bhat , Ghanshyam Dumre , Tek Raj Gyawali
{"title":"变废为宝:评估废玻璃替代混凝土的性能","authors":"Kushal Rana Bhat ,&nbsp;Ghanshyam Dumre ,&nbsp;Tek Raj Gyawali","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Waste glass (WG) poses a significant environmental challenge due to its non-biodegradability and prevalence in landfills. This paper investigates the effects of using WG as a replacement for coarse aggregate (CA), fine aggregate (FA), and cement in concrete, utilizing WG coarse aggregate (WGCA), WG fine aggregate (WGFA), and WG powder (WGP), respectively. WG was mechanically crushed and sieved to obtain WGCA, WGFA, and WGP. The use of whole crushed waste glass (WG) particles, without any residue, introduces a novel aspect to this work. The study examined these replacements in a control concrete mix with a water-cement ratio of 0.38 and a mix proportion of cement, FA, and CA of 1:1.717:2.560 by weight. Replacement levels were set at 0 %, 5 %, 10 %, 15 %, 20 %, and 25 % by weight of the respective ingredient. Results showed that incorporating WG improved the slump value of the concrete while slightly decreasing its density. The optimum replacement levels were identified as 15 % for both WGCA and WGFA, and 10 % for WGP, which enhanced the 28-day compressive strength by 22.1 %, 20.1 %, and 13.1 %, respectively. At 20 % replacement for CA and FA, and 15 % for C, the compressive strength was comparable to that of the control concrete. The elastic modulus followed a similar trend to the compressive strength. However, at these optimum WG replacement levels, flexural strength decreased to 6.04 MPa, 5.89 MPa, and 6.14 MPa, respectively, from 6.32 MPa in the control concrete. Splitting tensile strength decreased to 2.97 MPa, 3.07 MPa, and 3.23 MPa, respectively, from 3.35 MPa. Water absorption also reduced to 3.83 %, 4.23 %, and 4.41 %, respectively, from 4.61 %. Empirical models were developed and compared with those from previous studies. Further research to strengthen the interfacial transition zone and ascertain detailed durability properties is necessary before implementing this sustainable concrete in real-world applications. The implementation of the results from this research may not only minimize glass waste but also contribute to the production of sustainable concrete, reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and mitigating environmental degradation by lowering the consumption of cement and aggregates. Furthermore, this work plays a significant role in global efforts to reduce solid waste and combat environmental pollution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transforming waste into strength: Evaluating properties of concrete with waste glass substitution\",\"authors\":\"Kushal Rana Bhat ,&nbsp;Ghanshyam Dumre ,&nbsp;Tek Raj Gyawali\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Waste glass (WG) poses a significant environmental challenge due to its non-biodegradability and prevalence in landfills. This paper investigates the effects of using WG as a replacement for coarse aggregate (CA), fine aggregate (FA), and cement in concrete, utilizing WG coarse aggregate (WGCA), WG fine aggregate (WGFA), and WG powder (WGP), respectively. WG was mechanically crushed and sieved to obtain WGCA, WGFA, and WGP. The use of whole crushed waste glass (WG) particles, without any residue, introduces a novel aspect to this work. The study examined these replacements in a control concrete mix with a water-cement ratio of 0.38 and a mix proportion of cement, FA, and CA of 1:1.717:2.560 by weight. Replacement levels were set at 0 %, 5 %, 10 %, 15 %, 20 %, and 25 % by weight of the respective ingredient. Results showed that incorporating WG improved the slump value of the concrete while slightly decreasing its density. The optimum replacement levels were identified as 15 % for both WGCA and WGFA, and 10 % for WGP, which enhanced the 28-day compressive strength by 22.1 %, 20.1 %, and 13.1 %, respectively. At 20 % replacement for CA and FA, and 15 % for C, the compressive strength was comparable to that of the control concrete. The elastic modulus followed a similar trend to the compressive strength. However, at these optimum WG replacement levels, flexural strength decreased to 6.04 MPa, 5.89 MPa, and 6.14 MPa, respectively, from 6.32 MPa in the control concrete. Splitting tensile strength decreased to 2.97 MPa, 3.07 MPa, and 3.23 MPa, respectively, from 3.35 MPa. Water absorption also reduced to 3.83 %, 4.23 %, and 4.41 %, respectively, from 4.61 %. Empirical models were developed and compared with those from previous studies. Further research to strengthen the interfacial transition zone and ascertain detailed durability properties is necessary before implementing this sustainable concrete in real-world applications. The implementation of the results from this research may not only minimize glass waste but also contribute to the production of sustainable concrete, reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and mitigating environmental degradation by lowering the consumption of cement and aggregates. Furthermore, this work plays a significant role in global efforts to reduce solid waste and combat environmental pollution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Waste Systems\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Waste Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912524000526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912524000526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

废玻璃(WG)由于其不可生物降解性和在垃圾填埋场中的普遍存在,给环境带来了巨大的挑战。本文分别利用废玻璃粗骨料(WGCA)、废玻璃细骨料(WGFA)和废玻璃粉(WGP),研究了用废玻璃替代混凝土中粗骨料(CA)、细骨料(FA)和水泥的效果。WG 经机械破碎和筛分后可获得 WGCA、WGFA 和 WGP。使用不含任何残留物的完整破碎废玻璃 (WG) 颗粒为这项工作带来了一个新的方面。该研究在水灰比为 0.38,水泥、FA 和 CA 的混合比例为 1:1.717:2.560 (按重量计)的对照混凝土拌合物中检验了这些替代品。各种成分的替代比例分别为 0%、5%、10%、15%、20% 和 25%(按重量计)。结果表明,掺入 WG 可提高混凝土的坍落度值,同时略微降低其密度。WGCA 和 WGFA 的最佳添加量分别为 15%和 10%,28 天抗压强度分别提高了 22.1%、20.1% 和 13.1%。在 CA 和 FA 的替代率为 20% 和 C 的替代率为 15% 时,抗压强度与对照混凝土相当。弹性模量的变化趋势与抗压强度相似。然而,在这些最佳 WG 替代水平下,抗折强度分别从对照混凝土的 6.32 兆帕降至 6.04 兆帕、5.89 兆帕和 6.14 兆帕。劈裂拉伸强度从 3.35 兆帕分别降至 2.97 兆帕、3.07 兆帕和 3.23 兆帕。吸水率也从 4.61% 分别降至 3.83%、4.23% 和 4.41%。我们建立了经验模型,并与之前的研究进行了比较。在实际应用这种可持续混凝土之前,有必要开展进一步研究,以加强界面过渡区并确定详细的耐久性能。这项研究成果的实施不仅可以最大限度地减少玻璃废料,还有助于生产可持续混凝土,通过降低水泥和骨料的消耗,减少二氧化碳排放,缓解环境退化。此外,这项工作在全球减少固体废物和治理环境污染的努力中发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transforming waste into strength: Evaluating properties of concrete with waste glass substitution
Waste glass (WG) poses a significant environmental challenge due to its non-biodegradability and prevalence in landfills. This paper investigates the effects of using WG as a replacement for coarse aggregate (CA), fine aggregate (FA), and cement in concrete, utilizing WG coarse aggregate (WGCA), WG fine aggregate (WGFA), and WG powder (WGP), respectively. WG was mechanically crushed and sieved to obtain WGCA, WGFA, and WGP. The use of whole crushed waste glass (WG) particles, without any residue, introduces a novel aspect to this work. The study examined these replacements in a control concrete mix with a water-cement ratio of 0.38 and a mix proportion of cement, FA, and CA of 1:1.717:2.560 by weight. Replacement levels were set at 0 %, 5 %, 10 %, 15 %, 20 %, and 25 % by weight of the respective ingredient. Results showed that incorporating WG improved the slump value of the concrete while slightly decreasing its density. The optimum replacement levels were identified as 15 % for both WGCA and WGFA, and 10 % for WGP, which enhanced the 28-day compressive strength by 22.1 %, 20.1 %, and 13.1 %, respectively. At 20 % replacement for CA and FA, and 15 % for C, the compressive strength was comparable to that of the control concrete. The elastic modulus followed a similar trend to the compressive strength. However, at these optimum WG replacement levels, flexural strength decreased to 6.04 MPa, 5.89 MPa, and 6.14 MPa, respectively, from 6.32 MPa in the control concrete. Splitting tensile strength decreased to 2.97 MPa, 3.07 MPa, and 3.23 MPa, respectively, from 3.35 MPa. Water absorption also reduced to 3.83 %, 4.23 %, and 4.41 %, respectively, from 4.61 %. Empirical models were developed and compared with those from previous studies. Further research to strengthen the interfacial transition zone and ascertain detailed durability properties is necessary before implementing this sustainable concrete in real-world applications. The implementation of the results from this research may not only minimize glass waste but also contribute to the production of sustainable concrete, reducing CO2 emissions and mitigating environmental degradation by lowering the consumption of cement and aggregates. Furthermore, this work plays a significant role in global efforts to reduce solid waste and combat environmental pollution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信