在学校环境中对学生进行动机访谈:荟萃分析

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Jenna A. Gersib , Megan Rojo , Sarah G. King , Christian T. Doabler
{"title":"在学校环境中对学生进行动机访谈:荟萃分析","authors":"Jenna A. Gersib ,&nbsp;Megan Rojo ,&nbsp;Sarah G. King ,&nbsp;Christian T. Doabler","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a brief counseling intervention with demonstrated efficacy in ameliorating unhealthy habits across populations, behaviors, and settings. Although prior research underscores its benefit with adolescents, a comprehensive examination of its application in school settings remains unexplored. Therefore, the primary aim of the present meta-analysis was to calculate the average estimated effect of all studies examining the use of MI with students in school settings. Second, we sought to examine heterogeneity in effects through meta-regression models. Our final model included a meta-analysis of 38 studies with 207 effect sizes evaluating the efficacy of school-based MI. We estimated multivariate models using robust variance estimation with and without outliers. Our results demonstrate a significant estimated effect in favor of using MI to treat an array of behaviors (<em>g</em> = 0.18, 95% Prediction Interval [−0.26, 0.61]). Findings from the meta-regression analyses indicated three significant moderators: (a) the role of the interventionist, (b) target behaviors, and (c) dosage. We offer potential explanations of the findings and discuss current limitations and implications for future work regarding MI in school settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 101386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivational interviewing for students in school settings: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jenna A. Gersib ,&nbsp;Megan Rojo ,&nbsp;Sarah G. King ,&nbsp;Christian T. Doabler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a brief counseling intervention with demonstrated efficacy in ameliorating unhealthy habits across populations, behaviors, and settings. Although prior research underscores its benefit with adolescents, a comprehensive examination of its application in school settings remains unexplored. Therefore, the primary aim of the present meta-analysis was to calculate the average estimated effect of all studies examining the use of MI with students in school settings. Second, we sought to examine heterogeneity in effects through meta-regression models. Our final model included a meta-analysis of 38 studies with 207 effect sizes evaluating the efficacy of school-based MI. We estimated multivariate models using robust variance estimation with and without outliers. Our results demonstrate a significant estimated effect in favor of using MI to treat an array of behaviors (<em>g</em> = 0.18, 95% Prediction Interval [−0.26, 0.61]). Findings from the meta-regression analyses indicated three significant moderators: (a) the role of the interventionist, (b) target behaviors, and (c) dosage. We offer potential explanations of the findings and discuss current limitations and implications for future work regarding MI in school settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of School Psychology\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of School Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524001067\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524001067","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动机访谈法(MI)是一种简短的咨询干预方法,在改善不同人群、不同行为和不同环境中的不健康习惯方面具有明显的效果。尽管之前的研究强调了其对青少年的益处,但对其在学校环境中的应用的全面研究仍未进行。因此,本荟萃分析的主要目的是计算所有研究在学校环境中对学生使用多元智能的平均估计效果。其次,我们试图通过元回归模型来检验效果的异质性。我们的最终模型包含了对 38 项研究的荟萃分析,其中有 207 项研究对校内多元智能的效果进行了评估。我们使用稳健的方差估计法对有异常值和无异常值的多变量模型进行了估计。我们的结果表明,使用多元智能治疗一系列行为的估计效果显著(g = 0.18,95% 预测区间 [-0.26, 0.61])。元回归分析结果表明,有三个重要的调节因素:(a) 干预者的角色,(b) 目标行为和 (c) 剂量。我们对研究结果提出了可能的解释,并讨论了目前在学校环境中进行多元智能干预的局限性和对未来工作的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Motivational interviewing for students in school settings: A meta-analysis
Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a brief counseling intervention with demonstrated efficacy in ameliorating unhealthy habits across populations, behaviors, and settings. Although prior research underscores its benefit with adolescents, a comprehensive examination of its application in school settings remains unexplored. Therefore, the primary aim of the present meta-analysis was to calculate the average estimated effect of all studies examining the use of MI with students in school settings. Second, we sought to examine heterogeneity in effects through meta-regression models. Our final model included a meta-analysis of 38 studies with 207 effect sizes evaluating the efficacy of school-based MI. We estimated multivariate models using robust variance estimation with and without outliers. Our results demonstrate a significant estimated effect in favor of using MI to treat an array of behaviors (g = 0.18, 95% Prediction Interval [−0.26, 0.61]). Findings from the meta-regression analyses indicated three significant moderators: (a) the role of the interventionist, (b) target behaviors, and (c) dosage. We offer potential explanations of the findings and discuss current limitations and implications for future work regarding MI in school settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信