Francesc Canalejo-Codina , Mariola Cano-Morenilla , Jordi Martorell , Mercedes Balcells , Marta Pegueroles , Andrés A. García-Granada
{"title":"3D 打印聚合物支架设计:机械测试和计算建模","authors":"Francesc Canalejo-Codina , Mariola Cano-Morenilla , Jordi Martorell , Mercedes Balcells , Marta Pegueroles , Andrés A. García-Granada","doi":"10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Polymer-based bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) aim to reduce the long-term issues associated with metal stents. Yet, first-generation BRS designs experienced a significantly higher rate of clinical failures compared to permanent implants. This prompted the development of alternative scaffolds, such as the poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) solvent-casted stent, whose mechanical performance has yet to be addressed. This study examines the mechanical behavior of this novel scaffold across a wide range of parallel and radial compression diameters. The analysis highlights the scaffold’s varying responses under different loading conditions and provides insights into interpreting simulation model parameters to accurately reflect experimental results.</div><div>Stents demonstrated a parallel crush resistance of 0.11 N/mm at maximum compression, whereas the radial forces were significantly higher, reaching up to 1.80 N/mm. Additionally, the parallel test keeps the stent in the elastic regime, with almost no regions exceeding 50 MPa of stress, while the radial test causes significant structural deformation, with localized plastic strain reaching up to 30 %. Results showed that underestimating yield strain in computational models leads to discrepancies with experimental results, being 5 % the most accurate value for matching computational and experimental results for PLCL solvent-casted stents.</div><div>This comprehensive approach is vital for optimizing BRS design and predicting clinical performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":383,"journal":{"name":"Materials & Design","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 113395"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D printed polymeric stent design: Mechanical testing and computational modeling\",\"authors\":\"Francesc Canalejo-Codina , Mariola Cano-Morenilla , Jordi Martorell , Mercedes Balcells , Marta Pegueroles , Andrés A. García-Granada\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Polymer-based bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) aim to reduce the long-term issues associated with metal stents. Yet, first-generation BRS designs experienced a significantly higher rate of clinical failures compared to permanent implants. This prompted the development of alternative scaffolds, such as the poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) solvent-casted stent, whose mechanical performance has yet to be addressed. This study examines the mechanical behavior of this novel scaffold across a wide range of parallel and radial compression diameters. The analysis highlights the scaffold’s varying responses under different loading conditions and provides insights into interpreting simulation model parameters to accurately reflect experimental results.</div><div>Stents demonstrated a parallel crush resistance of 0.11 N/mm at maximum compression, whereas the radial forces were significantly higher, reaching up to 1.80 N/mm. Additionally, the parallel test keeps the stent in the elastic regime, with almost no regions exceeding 50 MPa of stress, while the radial test causes significant structural deformation, with localized plastic strain reaching up to 30 %. Results showed that underestimating yield strain in computational models leads to discrepancies with experimental results, being 5 % the most accurate value for matching computational and experimental results for PLCL solvent-casted stents.</div><div>This comprehensive approach is vital for optimizing BRS design and predicting clinical performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials & Design\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials & Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127524007706\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials & Design","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127524007706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
3D printed polymeric stent design: Mechanical testing and computational modeling
Polymer-based bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) aim to reduce the long-term issues associated with metal stents. Yet, first-generation BRS designs experienced a significantly higher rate of clinical failures compared to permanent implants. This prompted the development of alternative scaffolds, such as the poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) solvent-casted stent, whose mechanical performance has yet to be addressed. This study examines the mechanical behavior of this novel scaffold across a wide range of parallel and radial compression diameters. The analysis highlights the scaffold’s varying responses under different loading conditions and provides insights into interpreting simulation model parameters to accurately reflect experimental results.
Stents demonstrated a parallel crush resistance of 0.11 N/mm at maximum compression, whereas the radial forces were significantly higher, reaching up to 1.80 N/mm. Additionally, the parallel test keeps the stent in the elastic regime, with almost no regions exceeding 50 MPa of stress, while the radial test causes significant structural deformation, with localized plastic strain reaching up to 30 %. Results showed that underestimating yield strain in computational models leads to discrepancies with experimental results, being 5 % the most accurate value for matching computational and experimental results for PLCL solvent-casted stents.
This comprehensive approach is vital for optimizing BRS design and predicting clinical performance.
期刊介绍:
Materials and Design is a multi-disciplinary journal that publishes original research reports, review articles, and express communications. The journal focuses on studying the structure and properties of inorganic and organic materials, advancements in synthesis, processing, characterization, and testing, the design of materials and engineering systems, and their applications in technology. It aims to bring together various aspects of materials science, engineering, physics, and chemistry.
The journal explores themes ranging from materials to design and aims to reveal the connections between natural and artificial materials, as well as experiment and modeling. Manuscripts submitted to Materials and Design should contain elements of discovery and surprise, as they often contribute new insights into the architecture and function of matter.