双重道德风险下高度创新项目的最佳融资方式

IF 7.2 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Gino Loyola , Yolanda Portilla
{"title":"双重道德风险下高度创新项目的最佳融资方式","authors":"Gino Loyola ,&nbsp;Yolanda Portilla","doi":"10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A model is proposed for analyzing the financing of highly innovative projects undertaken by an investor and an entrepreneur as partners. It is shown that the optimal contract rewards the entrepreneur for success and failure but penalizes him for moderate returns. This theoretical scheme can be implemented by a hybrid financial structure that combines inside and outside equity and that is subsequently balanced by means of a reassignment mechanism contingent upon the project’s returns. Two settings are compared, one in which either of the partners innovates but not both (single moral hazard) and another in which both partners do (double moral hazard). We show that which setting is best depends on the degree of technological dependence between the partners’ innovation processes. This may explain the coexistence in practice of different financing and partnership arrangements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15525,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Finance","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102684"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal financing of highly innovative projects under double moral hazard\",\"authors\":\"Gino Loyola ,&nbsp;Yolanda Portilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A model is proposed for analyzing the financing of highly innovative projects undertaken by an investor and an entrepreneur as partners. It is shown that the optimal contract rewards the entrepreneur for success and failure but penalizes him for moderate returns. This theoretical scheme can be implemented by a hybrid financial structure that combines inside and outside equity and that is subsequently balanced by means of a reassignment mechanism contingent upon the project’s returns. Two settings are compared, one in which either of the partners innovates but not both (single moral hazard) and another in which both partners do (double moral hazard). We show that which setting is best depends on the degree of technological dependence between the partners’ innovation processes. This may explain the coexistence in practice of different financing and partnership arrangements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Finance\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102684\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119924001469\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119924001469","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个模型,用于分析由投资者和创业者作为合作伙伴开展的高度创新项目的融资问题。结果表明,最佳合同会因成功和失败而奖励创业者,但会因适度回报而惩罚创业者。这一理论方案可以通过内部和外部股权相结合的混合金融结构来实现,随后通过以项目回报为条件的再分配机制来实现平衡。我们对两种情况进行了比较,一种情况是其中任何一个合伙人进行创新,而不是两个合伙人都进行创新(单一道德风险),另一种情况是两个合伙人都进行创新(双重道德风险)。我们发现,哪种情况最好取决于合作伙伴创新过程之间的技术依赖程度。这可以解释为什么在实践中不同的融资和伙伴关系安排并存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal financing of highly innovative projects under double moral hazard
A model is proposed for analyzing the financing of highly innovative projects undertaken by an investor and an entrepreneur as partners. It is shown that the optimal contract rewards the entrepreneur for success and failure but penalizes him for moderate returns. This theoretical scheme can be implemented by a hybrid financial structure that combines inside and outside equity and that is subsequently balanced by means of a reassignment mechanism contingent upon the project’s returns. Two settings are compared, one in which either of the partners innovates but not both (single moral hazard) and another in which both partners do (double moral hazard). We show that which setting is best depends on the degree of technological dependence between the partners’ innovation processes. This may explain the coexistence in practice of different financing and partnership arrangements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Corporate Finance
Journal of Corporate Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Corporate Finance aims to publish high quality, original manuscripts that analyze issues related to corporate finance. Contributions can be of a theoretical, empirical, or clinical nature. Topical areas of interest include, but are not limited to: financial structure, payout policies, corporate restructuring, financial contracts, corporate governance arrangements, the economics of organizations, the influence of legal structures, and international financial management. Papers that apply asset pricing and microstructure analysis to corporate finance issues are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信