引入专门破产法院的意外后果:僵尸贷款的证据

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Chun Liu, Shilin Liang, Liang Sun
{"title":"引入专门破产法院的意外后果:僵尸贷款的证据","authors":"Chun Liu,&nbsp;Shilin Liang,&nbsp;Liang Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the economic consequences of the introduction of specialized bankruptcy courts (SBCs) from the perspective of zombie lending, using a sample of Chinese listed zombie firms in the 2016–2021 period. We find that the introduction of SBCs unexpectedly and significantly increases zombie lending, given the perverse incentives for banks and the intervention of local governments. The mechanism is that the introduction of SBCs improves the firms' bankruptcy efficiency, which increases the exposure probability of banks' bad loans and regional unemployment. To conceal these bad loans and unemployment, banks and local governments have to dramatically increase zombie lending. Thus, while better bankruptcy procedures are typically assumed to discourage zombie lending, we show that the introduction of SBCs may instead encourage such lending by exacerbating conflicts among creditors and political-economic frictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 103695"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unintended consequences of the introduction of specialized bankruptcy courts: evidence from zombie lending\",\"authors\":\"Chun Liu,&nbsp;Shilin Liang,&nbsp;Liang Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We examine the economic consequences of the introduction of specialized bankruptcy courts (SBCs) from the perspective of zombie lending, using a sample of Chinese listed zombie firms in the 2016–2021 period. We find that the introduction of SBCs unexpectedly and significantly increases zombie lending, given the perverse incentives for banks and the intervention of local governments. The mechanism is that the introduction of SBCs improves the firms' bankruptcy efficiency, which increases the exposure probability of banks' bad loans and regional unemployment. To conceal these bad loans and unemployment, banks and local governments have to dramatically increase zombie lending. Thus, while better bankruptcy procedures are typically assumed to discourage zombie lending, we show that the introduction of SBCs may instead encourage such lending by exacerbating conflicts among creditors and political-economic frictions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924006276\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924006276","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们以 2016-2021 年间中国上市的僵尸企业为样本,从僵尸贷款的角度研究了引入专门破产法院(SBC)的经济后果。我们发现,在银行的反向激励和地方政府的干预下,SBC 的引入出乎意料地大幅增加了僵尸贷款。其机理在于,证监会的引入提高了企业的破产效率,从而增加了银行不良贷款和地区失业的暴露概率。为了掩盖这些不良贷款和失业,银行和地方政府不得不大幅增加僵尸贷款。因此,虽然人们通常认为更好的破产程序会抑制僵尸贷款,但我们的研究表明,引入 SBC 反而会加剧债权人之间的冲突和政治经济摩擦,从而鼓励僵尸贷款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unintended consequences of the introduction of specialized bankruptcy courts: evidence from zombie lending
We examine the economic consequences of the introduction of specialized bankruptcy courts (SBCs) from the perspective of zombie lending, using a sample of Chinese listed zombie firms in the 2016–2021 period. We find that the introduction of SBCs unexpectedly and significantly increases zombie lending, given the perverse incentives for banks and the intervention of local governments. The mechanism is that the introduction of SBCs improves the firms' bankruptcy efficiency, which increases the exposure probability of banks' bad loans and regional unemployment. To conceal these bad loans and unemployment, banks and local governments have to dramatically increase zombie lending. Thus, while better bankruptcy procedures are typically assumed to discourage zombie lending, we show that the introduction of SBCs may instead encourage such lending by exacerbating conflicts among creditors and political-economic frictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信